new engine heavy haul no egt gauge
#16
Doesn't seem overboard to me either especially since the block sending unit was saying 200-210. Certainly not enough heat expansion to split the cast manifold, is it?
Hey thumper, how about those high quality plastic oilers!? ...sty
Where's the weak link here?
Hey thumper, how about those high quality plastic oilers!? ...sty
Where's the weak link here?
#17
How did you get them to give you a new engine running aftermarket injectors? I assume you took the EZ off before they saw it. These days you can't do anything to the truck without losing your warranty.
#18
Originally posted by Maccandy
Does that seem high to everyone? After reading other posts that temp should not hurt anything. Someone must have the real answer.
Does that seem high to everyone? After reading other posts that temp should not hurt anything. Someone must have the real answer.
I've noticed that, in the summer with our new 5th wheel, I really have to drive by the pyrometer. I generally try to hold temperatures down to 1100 to 1200 degF pre-turbo, 1000 degF on the long grades, and you'd be surprised how little throttle it takes to reach these temps. If I just closed my eyes and nailed the right pedal to the floor, I'm sure that I could melt it down. Coolant temps really aren't a very good indicator of EGT - my coolant temps are fine even on a 100 degF day pulling long grades.
Rusty
#19
Originally posted by deere nut
How did you get them to give you a new engine running aftermarket injectors? I assume you took the EZ off before they saw it. These days you can't do anything to the truck without losing your warranty.
How did you get them to give you a new engine running aftermarket injectors? I assume you took the EZ off before they saw it. These days you can't do anything to the truck without losing your warranty.
#20
Thanks Rusty, runnin in the 1400s makes the cheese more binding as they say round the milk house! What setting on ez do you run? Have you noticed significant delta t between adjustments to box while towing?
For example, could Herb zero the box and run with a margin of safety until egt monitor is online, considering the injector upgrade?...sty
For example, could Herb zero the box and run with a margin of safety until egt monitor is online, considering the injector upgrade?...sty
#22
Originally posted by rangerst
What setting on ez do you run? Have you noticed significant delta t between adjustments to box while towing?
For example, could Herb zero the box and run with a margin of safety until egt monitor is online, considering the injector upgrade?...sty
What setting on ez do you run? Have you noticed significant delta t between adjustments to box while towing?
For example, could Herb zero the box and run with a margin of safety until egt monitor is online, considering the injector upgrade?...sty
If I want to minimize EGT's with the EZ, it's as easy as unplugging the EZ's data link (CANbus) cable, leaving the MAP cable in place so that the EZ only acts as a boost fooler. In this configuration, I only see 1100 to 1150 degF maximum pre-turbo EGTs at around 30 PSIG boost when towing.
Rusty
#23
Originally posted by RustyJC
I run on setting #2, but it really doesn't matter - once over 20 psig boost, the EZ is on full fueling, regardless of the jumper setting.
If I want to minimize EGT's with the EZ, it's as easy as unplugging the EZ's data link (CANbus) cable, leaving the MAP cable in place so that the EZ only acts as a boost fooler. In this configuration, I only see 1100 to 1150 degF maximum pre-turbo EGTs at around 30 PSIG boost when towing.
Rusty
I run on setting #2, but it really doesn't matter - once over 20 psig boost, the EZ is on full fueling, regardless of the jumper setting.
If I want to minimize EGT's with the EZ, it's as easy as unplugging the EZ's data link (CANbus) cable, leaving the MAP cable in place so that the EZ only acts as a boost fooler. In this configuration, I only see 1100 to 1150 degF maximum pre-turbo EGTs at around 30 PSIG boost when towing.
Rusty
#24
Originally posted by herb
what is psig boost? would unplugging the non adjustable ez be necesary to control egt's
what is psig boost? would unplugging the non adjustable ez be necesary to control egt's
Yes, just unplug the one data link cable but (assuming you have a turnbuckle or equivalent on the HY35W-9 turbo's wastegate) leave the MAP cables plugged in so that you can take advantage of the higher boost (which lowers EGTs) without setting overboost codes in the ECM.
Rusty
#25
Originally posted by herb
i suspect that having had my cooling system serviced by chrysler a month prior and them putting straight antifreeze and not noticing a 35% flo restriction in the radiator may have had something to do with their desition. also the aftermarkets were not anything radical . they were the bosh 300's (witch i am told are what we refered to forever as the 275's)
i suspect that having had my cooling system serviced by chrysler a month prior and them putting straight antifreeze and not noticing a 35% flo restriction in the radiator may have had something to do with their desition. also the aftermarkets were not anything radical . they were the bosh 300's (witch i am told are what we refered to forever as the 275's)
IOW, the lower percentage of water, the less efficient your colling system is. I'd bet that the 35% restriction combined with the wrong antifreeze is probably enough to explain the engine damage.
You can't trust the Dash gauge for water temp. It's likely not that accurate.
Shoot, if you were running in hot weather all the time (and never had a risk of freezing), I'd just run water and Redline Water Wetter-- no antifreeze. Runs cool and no corrosion.
Justin
#26
To Justin's point, the specific heats of various coolants and coolant solutions at 200 degF is given below. Percentages are by weight.
100% water - 1.0052 BTU/lb/degF
60% water/40% ethylene glycol - 0.914 BTU/lb/degF
100% ethylene glycol - 0.660 BTU/lb/degF
60% water/40% propylene glycol - 0.944 BTU/lb/degF
100% propylene glycol - 0.699 BTU/lb/degF
Ref: Cooper-Bessemer Engineering Standard SB-20-3 and "A Guide to Glycol", copyright 1992 Dow Chemical Company (used by permission in the above-referenced engineering standard)
I believe I'd be looking at the dealer who put straight glycol into the cooling system to open up his wallet to at least contribute to the engine fund!
Rusty
100% water - 1.0052 BTU/lb/degF
60% water/40% ethylene glycol - 0.914 BTU/lb/degF
100% ethylene glycol - 0.660 BTU/lb/degF
60% water/40% propylene glycol - 0.944 BTU/lb/degF
100% propylene glycol - 0.699 BTU/lb/degF
Ref: Cooper-Bessemer Engineering Standard SB-20-3 and "A Guide to Glycol", copyright 1992 Dow Chemical Company (used by permission in the above-referenced engineering standard)
I believe I'd be looking at the dealer who put straight glycol into the cooling system to open up his wallet to at least contribute to the engine fund!
Rusty
#27
Originally posted by RustyJC
To Justin's point, the specific heats of various coolants and coolant solutions at 200 degF is given below. Percentages are by weight.
100% water - 1.0052 BTU/lb/degF
60% water/40% ethylene glycol - 0.914 BTU/lb/degF
100% ethylene glycol - 0.660 BTU/lb/degF
60% water/40% propylene glycol - 0.944 BTU/lb/degF
100% propylene glycol - 0.699 BTU/lb/degF
Ref: Cooper-Bessemer Engineering Standard SB-20-3 and "A Guide to Glycol", copyright 1992 Dow Chemical Company (used by permission in the above-referenced engineering standard)
I believe I'd be looking at the dealer who put straight glycol into the cooling system to open up his wallet to at least contribute to the engine fund!
dodge is paying for engine be nice if the dealer would helf offset the cost for the rental truck to finish the trip and get back (2200.00) and the extra three days of motel and food waiting at the dealers location to find out what we had to do.
Fat chance
Rusty
To Justin's point, the specific heats of various coolants and coolant solutions at 200 degF is given below. Percentages are by weight.
100% water - 1.0052 BTU/lb/degF
60% water/40% ethylene glycol - 0.914 BTU/lb/degF
100% ethylene glycol - 0.660 BTU/lb/degF
60% water/40% propylene glycol - 0.944 BTU/lb/degF
100% propylene glycol - 0.699 BTU/lb/degF
Ref: Cooper-Bessemer Engineering Standard SB-20-3 and "A Guide to Glycol", copyright 1992 Dow Chemical Company (used by permission in the above-referenced engineering standard)
I believe I'd be looking at the dealer who put straight glycol into the cooling system to open up his wallet to at least contribute to the engine fund!
dodge is paying for engine be nice if the dealer would helf offset the cost for the rental truck to finish the trip and get back (2200.00) and the extra three days of motel and food waiting at the dealers location to find out what we had to do.
Fat chance
Rusty
#28
Originally posted by herb
Not to get too technical, but if you know the flow rate of the coolant through the engine (in pounds per minute) and the temperature rise from the water pump inlet to the back side of the thermostat (in degrees Fahrenheit), you can calculate how much heat is being rejected from the engine to the coolant each minute if you know the specific heat of whatever's circulating through the cooling jackets.
Rejected Heat (BTU/minute) = Flow (lbs/minute) x Temperature Rise (degF) x Specific Heat of Coolant (BTU/lb/degF)
Rusty
#30
Rusty, with no turnbuckle on HY turbo I did a test run today pullin a 9 ton tagalong with 5000 lb up a long 2-3% hill accelerating from 60 to 70 mph at max 20 lb boost [thats all it does] and egt hit 1250 before I reached the top. I backed off at 70, but think had I stayed with it the temp would have kept going to. Had a hub and drum gettin hot on the trailer, didn't want to burn it up. accually, I had to pull the wheels off that axel and limp back 3 legged after the test.
nice scoop on the coolant" mix up" good 'did ya know' dope. htanks...sty
nice scoop on the coolant" mix up" good 'did ya know' dope. htanks...sty