Quadzilla Adrenaline fuel sender
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Quadzilla Adrenaline fuel sender
I installed ADR on my brothers 98.5 & got a fuel sender from the local store. The sender that quad provided with the Adrenaline is a 0-40psi, 240-33.5 ohm load. That sensor is way too picky for my taste. When driving down the road it jumps from 16psi, 4psi, 11psi, 8psi on a hard run at steady throttle while my mechanical reads a steady 16-14psi. This got me thinking, what if I widen the psi range at the same ohm load? I bought a Stewart Warner #701-1565 pressure sender [0-100psi, 240-33.5 ohm] & installed it in my brothers truck leaving the mechanical gauge to compare pressures. At idle they both read 15psi [fuel psi adjustment on Pulse is set all the way down] At wot the mechanical gauge reads 8psi while the Pulse reads 12psi. That tells me that I took too big of a step on the psi range of my sender. I am willing to bet that a 0-80psi, 240-33.5 ohm load would read identical to a mechanical gauge. I am going to order one & find out.
#2
Banned
Thread Starter
Here is a graph explaining my hillbilly logic.
Attachment 22714
Attachment 22714
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What does the fuel adjustment in the pulse do? Does it scale it linearly as a PSI offset to bring your readings back to accurate, or is it "stretching" or "shrinking" the scaling to allow use of different senders?
edit: Forgot to mention the reason we have senders with such a narrow range is because, and this is if I remember right, the broader range senders seem to start reading inaccurately at the lower pressures we need them for. Not only that but their "clarity" isn't as good as it should be, and we might get a 5 psi fluctuation and never know it.
I guess it depends on what your intended goal is
edit: Forgot to mention the reason we have senders with such a narrow range is because, and this is if I remember right, the broader range senders seem to start reading inaccurately at the lower pressures we need them for. Not only that but their "clarity" isn't as good as it should be, and we might get a 5 psi fluctuation and never know it.
I guess it depends on what your intended goal is
#4
Banned
Thread Starter
What does the fuel adjustment in the pulse do? Does it scale it linearly as a PSI offset to bring your readings back to accurate, or is it "stretching" or "shrinking" the scaling to allow use of different senders?
edit: Forgot to mention the reason we have senders with such a narrow range is because, and this is if I remember right, the broader range senders seem to start reading inaccurately at the lower pressures we need them for. Not only that but their "clarity" isn't as good as it should be, and we might get a 5 psi fluctuation and never know it.
I guess it depends on what your intended goal is
edit: Forgot to mention the reason we have senders with such a narrow range is because, and this is if I remember right, the broader range senders seem to start reading inaccurately at the lower pressures we need them for. Not only that but their "clarity" isn't as good as it should be, and we might get a 5 psi fluctuation and never know it.
I guess it depends on what your intended goal is
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Central Iowa
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there any reason we HAVE to run a fuel sender with the ADR. I didnt get one with my box, so I just continue to rely on the mech. guage I had previously. Do we get extra control with it on, or is it just to have fuel pressure shown on the Pulse?
Thanks,
Thanks,
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mopar440cu
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
2
11-21-2015 08:39 PM
redneck2thamax
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
4
01-25-2010 07:00 PM
AlCorr
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
4
09-25-2008 12:33 PM
Smokin98.5
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
0
05-29-2008 05:35 PM
purduepurdy
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
5
05-10-2008 08:20 PM