Quad Adrenaline Beta Testing....
#1801
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort Nel$on
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh yeah! but if not i'll have to buy that chip that gets rid of it from bd power. its only a couple hundred i think.
btw that dynorun, which pl setting was it on? in the the new rowj file is 8 still a touch more powerful or is 10 better?
#1802
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camp Pendleton, CA
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a brand new one that I used for part of the trade for the Adreneline I'm getting. Hopefully they will figure the Tq management out and be able to get rid of it so I dont need to buy something else.
#1803
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Springfield, OH
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder if it can even be done from the Pulse/Adrenaline? I know with the RAD, you need to cut and intercept the required signals with the RAD close to the ECM and also cut and intercept the signals to the PCM.
#1804
Registered User
I don't think it would work for daily driving, even if Quad included it, since we loose gauges and get a full time CEL when it's switched on.
Strictly for racing. If BD couldn't clean it up better than they have and give more regular panel functions... I assume it can't be done.
It is nice that the Speed Controller function which eliminates top end defueling at 115 mph (109 mph on 3rd Gens) works full time.
RJ
#1805
Banned
I just broke down and bgt one. Now called the 'Speed Controller, with RAD function". Installed it yesterday.
I don't think it would work for daily driving, even if Quad included it, since we loose gauges and get a full time CEL when it's switched on.
Strictly for racing. If BD couldn't clean it up better than they have and give more regular panel functions... I assume it can't be done.
It is nice that the Speed Controller function which eliminates top end defueling at 115 mph (109 mph on 3rd Gens) works full time.
RJ
I don't think it would work for daily driving, even if Quad included it, since we loose gauges and get a full time CEL when it's switched on.
Strictly for racing. If BD couldn't clean it up better than they have and give more regular panel functions... I assume it can't be done.
It is nice that the Speed Controller function which eliminates top end defueling at 115 mph (109 mph on 3rd Gens) works full time.
RJ
#1806
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man, see what I get for going on vacation! Quad, I didn't get the tune either. I'd love to get it though, especially since my truck doesn't smoke much to begin with!
Email is still xtoyz@frontiernet.net
Thanks,
Shawn!
Email is still xtoyz@frontiernet.net
Thanks,
Shawn!
#1807
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The first run was on pl10, second run was pl10 and water/meth(something is wrong with my meth system), third run was pl10 stacked with smarty 2(top hp and tq was lower, however average hp and tq was a lot higher), third run was pl08(made the most top hp and tq).
#1808
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Springfield, OH
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think it would work for daily driving, even if Quad included it, since we loose gauges and get a full time CEL when it's switched on.
Strictly for racing. If BD couldn't clean it up better than they have and give more regular panel functions... I assume it can't be done.
RJ
Strictly for racing. If BD couldn't clean it up better than they have and give more regular panel functions... I assume it can't be done.
RJ
#1811
Registered User
At this point the only thing I have found that COMPLETELY defeats the torque managment is the RAD/Speed limiter. Other products reduce it, but do not completely defeat it. As mentioned above though it does come at a price, and that is the lose of some of the gauges, and a CEL.
The purpose was to protect the transmission. If you have stock shafts and you feel the torque limiting, it's probably a good thing it's still there...
Paul
#1813
Registered User
Or if you drive a manual there is no torque management. That said, it is pretty difficult to build the required boost with a manual to require torque management anyway, probably why DC never put torque management on stick shift rigs.
#1814
Registered User
Paul
#1815
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camp Pendleton, CA
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can get mine to do a burnout easy but at the track it is bad in 1st and 2nd gear. The smarty get's rid of it but it reprograms the ECM so I guess maybe there is no hope without a RAD or smarty