Mad ECM on H.O.'s ?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-19-2005, 05:18 PM

#16

HOHN

Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2003

Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN

Posts: 6,564

Likes: 0

Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phatboy

I hope so- I'd like to see if Marco can respond to your pedal response issue. Sounds like there are still improvements being made

If it is going to happen can you ask for the regular instead of the special? It'd be worth taking off the va for the test

Maybe this time you'll keep it

Send Bob the VA and see if he notices =P
J/k of course- hope you guys don't mind a n00b talking a little smack

I considered sending Bob back an empty box, but I figured I'd rather not be like that.

That ECM is tempting enough to make a good boy go bad!

Reply Like

10-21-2005, 10:19 AM

#17

Ben

Registered User

Join Date: May 2003

Location: Northern Minnesota

Posts: 260

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

In my members photos is a dyno sheet of Catcher vs EZ. The Ez was dyno'd in 2003 and the Catcher was yesterday. Only difference is 1 size larger tires, fass II, and Scotty II.

Catcher yielded less HP but more torque. Curves are similar, with the Catcher coming in a couple RPM sooner.

I'm kinda stumped why the ECM tapers off at 2000 rpm and the EZ keeps going on the HP. Esp since the ecm pulls so hard towards 3000 rpm.

What the dyno doesn't show is real world. IMO the EZ is no comparison to the ECM. On paper it's a little better but real world it's not. I was never able to run the gears like I can with the Catcher.