How much power can i expect?
03-31-2008, 11:44 PM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Camp Pendleton, CA
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-01-2008, 06:16 AM
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can officially say my tranny is not up to the task. When we got it on the dyno and loaded it. The transmission was slipping and holding me back on making numbers.
Stock 309.9 RWHP
559.1 TQ
70HP Box Setting
337.9 RWHP
633.7 TQ
120HP 338.3 RWHP Corrected 382.2 HP
756.1 TQ Corrected 854.3 TQ
There was also a new 6.4 powerstroke out there and it only put down 230RWHP and i forgot the TQ. But i think these numbers seemed a little low. I have read that 6.4 trucks dyno more around 280-290 bone stock.
Later,
Josh
Stock 309.9 RWHP
559.1 TQ
70HP Box Setting
337.9 RWHP
633.7 TQ
120HP 338.3 RWHP Corrected 382.2 HP
756.1 TQ Corrected 854.3 TQ
There was also a new 6.4 powerstroke out there and it only put down 230RWHP and i forgot the TQ. But i think these numbers seemed a little low. I have read that 6.4 trucks dyno more around 280-290 bone stock.
Later,
Josh
04-01-2008, 10:26 AM
#20
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was the truck a auto or stick?
04-01-2008, 02:33 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And on a dynojet or mustang dyno????? His numbers would have been higher on a dynojet as you know. Hell, look at my numbers. I don't even really believe them. 
How high did your EGTs get on the dyno? Mine can peg the pyro at the top of 3rd gear, however EGTs never got over 1250 on a dynojet; proof that the dynojet doesn't load these engines enough for realistic readings.
How high did your EGTs get on the dyno? Mine can peg the pyro at the top of 3rd gear, however EGTs never got over 1250 on a dynojet; proof that the dynojet doesn't load these engines enough for realistic readings.
04-01-2008, 04:03 PM
#22
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And on a dynojet or mustang dyno????? His numbers would have been higher on a dynojet as you know. Hell, look at my numbers. I don't even really believe them.
How high did your EGTs get on the dyno? Mine can peg the pyro at the top of 3rd gear, however EGTs never got over 1250 on a dynojet; proof that the dynojet doesn't load these engines enough for realistic readings.
How high did your EGTs get on the dyno? Mine can peg the pyro at the top of 3rd gear, however EGTs never got over 1250 on a dynojet; proof that the dynojet doesn't load these engines enough for realistic readings.
04-01-2008, 04:20 PM
#24
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did the test on a mustang dyno. I searched around and found that the correction factor was around 13% so that's where that number came from.
04-01-2008, 09:05 PM
#27
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do you want to see? It's just a 4cyl..
If you want i can PM you some more.
Yeah no problem. Thanks for sharing your numbers with me. I am sure my numbers will climb over 400rwhp with a tranny. Because it just ain't cutting it right now.
If you want i can PM you some more.
04-02-2008, 06:25 AM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eastern Shore of Maryland
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts