Cruising boost on a 62/71/14
07-01-2009, 10:52 PM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have had a 62/71/13- 62/65/13 and now now a 62/71/14. I tow around 10,000lbs to 12,000lbs in 3,500ft. elevations and up and I love the heck out of the 71/14 over any of the the other ones I have had. Cools great and starts to back temps off as it gets running the 65 wheel IMO was a huge turd that heated up fast and never cooled off not to mention it went flat real fast where as the 71/14 seems to keep pulling. JMO
07-01-2009, 11:20 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SLC, Ut. 4,200 ft.
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ph4tty and Bridleman, Looks like you two are flowin abit more fuel then me though. And I only tow more then 6k lbs a few times a year.
I appreciate your feed back but I think that will just be too big for my fuel mods and what I need it to do.
Pinkston any feed back on these sizes?
I appreciate your feed back but I think that will just be too big for my fuel mods and what I need it to do.
Pinkston any feed back on these sizes?
I figure, with jammer 4's and top stage on your quad adr your looking at about 300 maybe a little more, extra fueling hp. and you were gettin your 62/65/12 to 1600*.
With my Hot J/A and 105-10hp sticks Im lookin at about 230 ish hp in extra fueling. I just cant decide between
62/65/12 or 14 or..
64/65/12 or 14.
Im conserned a 14 will spool too slow for around town towing, so maybe 12?
Also a 64/65 would give me just a little more air to keep it cooler.
With my Hot J/A and 105-10hp sticks Im lookin at about 230 ish hp in extra fueling. I just cant decide between
62/65/12 or 14 or..
64/65/12 or 14.
Im conserned a 14 will spool too slow for around town towing, so maybe 12?
Also a 64/65 would give me just a little more air to keep it cooler.
07-02-2009, 06:07 AM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fredericksburg, virginia
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have had a 62/71/13- 62/65/13 and now now a 62/71/14. I tow around 10,000lbs to 12,000lbs in 3,500ft. elevations and up and I love the heck out of the 71/14 over any of the the other ones I have had. Cools great and starts to back temps off as it gets running the 65 wheel IMO was a huge turd that heated up fast and never cooled off not to mention it went flat real fast where as the 71/14 seems to keep pulling. JMO
I went from a 64/65 to a 62/71 and noticed that even with the smaller compressor.
07-02-2009, 11:52 AM
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My jammers may be one of the reasons I dont like the 62/71/14 as much. With the way my truck is set up now the smaller turbo was much better.
My Mach 4s should be here any day so I may have a different opinion of the turbo after than.
My Mach 4s should be here any day so I may have a different opinion of the turbo after than.
07-02-2009, 09:04 PM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SLC, Ut. 4,200 ft.
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm. I think I'll go with 64/65/14. Compared to my HY-35, that will be a huge differance already. Then throw in some ddp 3's or Mach 2's with 3 piece exhaust mani and studs and hopefully, my truck will be just what ive been wanting.
Thanks for all your info guys.
Ian
Thanks for all your info guys.
Ian
07-03-2009, 01:48 AM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Roseburg Oregon
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had jammer stage 3 when I put on my turbo and it was blaw. shortly after I upgraded to mach 4's and it was night and day. cleaner smoother and I will say the mach 4's and my 62/71/14 are great. a good smooth punch. I actually was able to keep same mpg but better power range. I dont get toasty at all. you will like your mach's
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bookshelf
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
13
11-13-2008 05:06 PM
draebi
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
2
02-27-2004 03:23 PM