Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

choosen injectors??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2007, 08:18 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
HOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Bigmack-- in your case, you won't see any improvement in spoolup going bigger than a Mach 4-- it might actually get worse.

If you are stuck with the 64/14 turbo, then you have to use a Mach 4 or maybe even smaller.

But if at all possible, not ONLY should you go with a smaller housing, but a smaller turbo in general-- a 62mm like the Super Stock 62. You're gonna hate the lag and smoke of a huge single and huge injectors with an auto trans. Now, keep in mind that the aftermarket tranny upgrades are going to tighten up your tranny (which is good); but the tighter trans will only make your lag and smoke worse.

Bottom line-- you need a smaller turbo for that auto trans. If HTT can't hook you up, you could probably sell it used for about what you paid, since the HTT turbos are pretty highly regarded.

I can't emphasize enough the importance of spoolup to making a truck fun and useful. You'll notice that I'm STILL running the stock turbo, which is WAY too small for the amount of fuel I'm running-- about 75hp too small!

When I upgrade, it's going to be a conservative upgrade to a 62mm turbo, because that spoolup is just so important.

JMO
Old 06-15-2007, 08:25 PM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bigmack2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I need to go to a 62/12 and that would be the ideal turbo and with that I can run bigger sticks, like the mach 5's or 6's.
Old 06-15-2007, 08:29 PM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bigmack2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the trucks that are running that 64 mm and the 66 sled puller turbos
how do they compensate for the lag do they fix it with NOS or Meth injection.
Old 06-15-2007, 08:33 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
dieselfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lake Charles,Louisiana
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigmack2500
What about the trucks that are running that 64 mm and the 66 sled puller turbos
how do they compensate for the lag do they fix it with NOS or Meth injection.
they run big stixs and fueling boxs.
Old 06-15-2007, 08:37 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
dieselfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lake Charles,Louisiana
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigmack2500
So I need to go to a 62/12 and that would be the ideal turbo and with that I can run bigger sticks, like the mach 5's or 6's.
hes saying go with a 62 for spool up reasons and since you have an auto, but i doubt you could run that big of stixs with a 62 comfortably .

you should stay with the 64, unless you are disappointed now. you will be happier with more fuel.

here is Mike D sig
look at this setup 64/12 with 4.5's puttin down 507/1042

99 2500 CTD SB/QC 4x4 Auto SLT Trans with IE Billet input/output built by TRE Diesel "Timinva", Goerend race VB, SMARTY, TST COMP. PM3, F1 Mach 4.5, 64/12 Killer B2, Thuren Trackbar, AFE, 4" exhaust, Isspro Egt, FP, Boost, Tunes provided by Eclipse 8053, Zapco Amps and JL Audio.
NC DTR Chapter #18 Member

Dyno 507/1042 (Corrected) with Killer B2, Non-Comp. TST and Smarty #3

13.025@102.71 MPH 1/8 mile 8.28@83 mph Dec. 10th 2006 with regular TST #9 and Smarty #3!
Old 06-15-2007, 08:42 PM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bigmack2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok comp on 5x5 and smarty on #9cachter not enough, I'm trying to find a way to make my turbo work well, and not have to change it out. I'll try anything and
I'm aware of the domino effect if u do this u have to upgrade that.
Old 06-15-2007, 08:44 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
dieselfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lake Charles,Louisiana
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigmack2500
Ok comp on 5x5 and smarty on #9cachter not enough, I'm trying to find a way to make my turbo work well, and not have to change it out. I'll try anything and
I'm aware of the domino effect if u do this u have to upgrade that.
look at the sig i posted its a similar setup except you have an edge instead of a TST. it 500+hp thats what you wanted huh? reread the post.
Old 06-15-2007, 08:50 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
HOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by bigmack2500
So I need to go to a 62/12 and that would be the ideal turbo and with that I can run bigger sticks, like the mach 5's or 6's.
No, what I'm saying is that you should run a 62mm turbo and that mach 5s or 6s won't spool the turbo any faster than mach 4s.

However, if you're happy with your 64mm turbo (and many guys are), then you could definiely run a bigger injector like a Mach 6. Do NOT expect a Mach6 to spool the turbo faster than a Mach 4! It won't happen!

As for those guys running the Sledpuller 66 turbos and such-- Yes, the run huge injectors and fueling boxes, but they STILL have lag to deal with. And because the do run the big sticks, the lag is much smokier than with smaller injectors.

So how do they deal with lag? The live with it and rev the engine higher. There are some guys who say a turbo spools "not bad" if it's spooled by 2000 rpm. To me, that's way too laggy.

JMO
Old 06-15-2007, 08:52 PM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bigmack2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If more fuel will fix the problem then I guess I'm going with more fuel. someone had said that to much fuel could hurt me though in an early reply.
Old 06-15-2007, 09:00 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
HOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
That's the thing: more fuel won't fix the problem-- it will just make the problem tougher to live with.
Old 06-15-2007, 09:06 PM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bigmack2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the lag I'm going to have to live with but if I go with a Mach 5 or 6 once the turbo is spooled up there shouldn't be a problem running these injectors, other that my EGT's going up. The EGT's can be fixed with some drugs hinting the domino effect.
Old 06-15-2007, 09:17 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
dieselfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lake Charles,Louisiana
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigmack2500
So the lag I'm going to have to live with but if I go with a Mach 5 or 6 once the turbo is spooled up there shouldn't be a problem running these injectors, other that my EGT's going up. The EGT's can be fixed with some drugs hinting the domino effect.
you should be fine b/c of your location and the HUMUDITY.
4.5's would be the conservtive choice.
6's would keep you from buying injectors again.
Old 06-15-2007, 09:25 PM
  #28  
bsp
Registered User
 
bsp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St.Pete/Clwtr, Florida
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really like my sps62/m4 smarty combo. It can be smokey on#5,7,9 if you aren't careful,(lugging the motor). Like Hohn says, with a tight auto and my taller 3:54's, it's a different way of driving than when stock. Towing on #3 is pretty clean, however, I'm at sea level so not much help there. Overall I think this combo is great, and on the big highway this is one nice cruising turbo.
Old 06-15-2007, 09:26 PM
  #29  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bigmack2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I probably going with the mach 5's they say the 6's are for twins
Old 06-15-2007, 10:02 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Tate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Posts: 7,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 6's are only 20 hp more, and IIRC, they are of a newer, cleaner design than the 5's. If' you're gonna go for 5's, jump to 6's.


Quick Reply: choosen injectors??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.