catcher timming question????
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: vernon b.c. canada
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
catcher timming question????
hi guys,im really leaning towards a mad ecm,my question is,is the special one for use witha comp as noticeable as the regular one?i have a comp but run it mostly on the lower settings for milage only.if i got a regular ecm and ran the comp low would it be ok?also im worried if the comp craps out on me{like ive read many do}i dont want to be stuck with a not to noticable ecm.just a though.let me know you opinions.
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Trust me-- it's noticeable. I tested a "special" for a couple days. It was SICK with the bottom end response and fueling.
This was with JUST the ECM and my injectors.
Since I *only* have experience with the "special", I can't tell you how it differs from a regular catcher in the response area.
All I can say is that even the special is amazingly responsive, and you will NOT be stuck with a gutless wonder if you run just the ECM and your injectors.
jlh
This was with JUST the ECM and my injectors.
Since I *only* have experience with the "special", I can't tell you how it differs from a regular catcher in the response area.
All I can say is that even the special is amazingly responsive, and you will NOT be stuck with a gutless wonder if you run just the ECM and your injectors.
jlh
#3
Registered User
Hohn's expirience with the special is great imput...only example I know of testing no timing box AND a MAD ECM with no timing.
I would not ever run a regular MAD ECM (with timing) and a box with timing. I have heard rumors the MAD ECM adds almost 30 degrees timing. This may or may not be accurate...but it does add all you need.
Also, I don't believe the Comp changes/reduces timing with a lower setting?
Do you really see better mileage with the Comp turned down??
RJ
I would not ever run a regular MAD ECM (with timing) and a box with timing. I have heard rumors the MAD ECM adds almost 30 degrees timing. This may or may not be accurate...but it does add all you need.
Also, I don't believe the Comp changes/reduces timing with a lower setting?
Do you really see better mileage with the Comp turned down??
RJ
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: vernon b.c. canada
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanx for the great responses,after all the reading of other posts ivedecieded the catcher is the way to go.i will get the special one.{hope my comp never craps out}i idid notice a diference in milage with the comp on 3-1 as aposed to the higher settings.i get the least amount of smoke and still decent response with the setup i have on that setting.havent done the math yet but seems like im going farther per tank.maybe some catcher guys will help the other guy out but i think the catcher is year specific from what ive read.
#6
Registered User
Ocmechanx
It will run beautifully...on a 5 speed or an auto. However you will loose your oil pressure readings...not actual pressure , just the indicator. The oil pressure sensor unit was redesigned in 02 to give more accurate readings and is not compatible with previous 2nd gens.
RJ
RJ
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
My mistake, I guess. Think of the EZ's.... 01 + 02 are same unit...just a different hook up. But before 01...totally different programing in the Box!
RJ
RJ
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas City & Maysville, MO
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Ocmechanx
Originally posted by rjohnson
It will run beautifully...on a 5 speed or an auto. However you will loose your oil pressure readings...not actual pressure , just the indicator. The oil pressure sensor unit was redesigned in 02 to give more accurate readings and is not compatible with previous 2nd gens.
RJ
It will run beautifully...on a 5 speed or an auto. However you will loose your oil pressure readings...not actual pressure , just the indicator. The oil pressure sensor unit was redesigned in 02 to give more accurate readings and is not compatible with previous 2nd gens.
RJ
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elk Grove,CA.
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the Van Aaken V5 box and really like the bottom end power. If
I get a CaTCHER , should I get the special with no timing and stack it
with the Van Aaken , or get the regular CaTCHER and sell the Van Aaken.
Performance is more important that trying to save the most money.
I get a CaTCHER , should I get the special with no timing and stack it
with the Van Aaken , or get the regular CaTCHER and sell the Van Aaken.
Performance is more important that trying to save the most money.
#12
Registered User
RJ, I believe there are 29 different software version for the 98.5-2002 trucks.
All that I am trying to do is save someone some grief and frustrations if there is a software conflict.
Dieselcamper, sell the va and recoup some of the catcher cost.
Marco programs the catcher to get all of the fuel of of the vp44 within stock parameters ( no wire tap)
I only saw a 3 hp gain by adding an ez stacked to my catcher
(your results may vary)
All that I am trying to do is save someone some grief and frustrations if there is a software conflict.
Dieselcamper, sell the va and recoup some of the catcher cost.
Marco programs the catcher to get all of the fuel of of the vp44 within stock parameters ( no wire tap)
I only saw a 3 hp gain by adding an ez stacked to my catcher
(your results may vary)
#13
Registered User
Re: Re: Ocmechanx
Originally posted by jfpointer
So an '02 ecm is more or less required for an '02, but other years are more interchangeable? Or am I interpreting this thread wrong?
So an '02 ecm is more or less required for an '02, but other years are more interchangeable? Or am I interpreting this thread wrong?
Dieselcamper - If performance is important...I would not sell the VA. The MAD ECM taps no wire, and as such does not add fuel at top end. Stack with a "special" and learn to roll into throttle gradually...you'll get amazing bottom end as well as your present VA top end.
Bob, I understand and appreciate the imput. I was amazed my 02 auto MAD ECM worked well in an 01, 5 speed. Ran beautifully and only problem was loss of oil pressure gauge. Also worked great in an 02, 5 speed with no oil pressure gauge problem. The Dodge ECM is dumb enough to work in some cases...but not in others. Just trying to figure it out, myself.
RJ
#14
Registered User
Re: Re: Ocmechanx
Originally posted by jfpointer
So an '02 ecm is more or less required for an '02, but other years are more interchangeable? Or am I interpreting this thread wrong?
So an '02 ecm is more or less required for an '02, but other years are more interchangeable? Or am I interpreting this thread wrong?
02/auto/federal emissions is a different program than the 02/6sp/federal emission
not interchangable
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: menomonie,wisconsin
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would i see an improvement over a comp if i switched to a catcher and some injectors? What about egt's and mileage? Just trying to get a feel for what would give me the best all around performance and economy.