Big Blue24 Goes Big on the Dyno
#31
GFB, we have nearly identical setups, except for the turbo. Why don't you find a local dynojet so we can see how the Super B compares to a stock 3rd gen turbo. I have theories that the Super B will not perform as well as the HE351, but I have no solid proof. The Super B is rated for 425HP, but I bet you could squeeze more than 450 out of it.
I have read about a couple of 06' guys who upgraded to the super B and felt that it wasn't a noticeable upgrade but maybe even a step backwards.
I have read about a couple of 06' guys who upgraded to the super B and felt that it wasn't a noticeable upgrade but maybe even a step backwards.
#32
Registered User
Thread Starter
Sounds good GFB.
I'm having dyno withdrawal, I'll be in Las Vegas again Saturday, maybe I can distract my wife with a "just because" gift certificate to GAP and go play at the dyno shop some more.
I'm having dyno withdrawal, I'll be in Las Vegas again Saturday, maybe I can distract my wife with a "just because" gift certificate to GAP and go play at the dyno shop some more.
#33
Need to get that fixed first.
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Belgrade, Montana
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't mean to be the bearer of bad news but the graphs are showing a corrected number. STD is the old standard correction factor before SAE was used. To add to the injury, STD usually shows more HP than the current SAE used which is why a lot of operators out there use the STD correction. For reference, if no correction is used on a Dynojet then it will show Actual HP and Actual Torque on the axis'.
Having said that, there is a correction that is needed even for our trucks with turbos. It isn't quite as aggressive of a correction that's currently needed to compare naturally aspirated engines but nonetheless there is one out there but no dynos use one for forced aspiration.
Sorry. Still very nice numbers though for sure.
Having said that, there is a correction that is needed even for our trucks with turbos. It isn't quite as aggressive of a correction that's currently needed to compare naturally aspirated engines but nonetheless there is one out there but no dynos use one for forced aspiration.
Sorry. Still very nice numbers though for sure.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thenrie
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
7
09-25-2011 04:47 PM
pwerwagn
Natl. and Regional Chapters / Special Events
2
02-28-2007 03:18 AM
502502
Natl. and Regional Chapters / Special Events
23
11-23-2005 06:16 PM
converteddzlr
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
5
07-29-2005 01:35 PM