Allison tranny
#211
Defuel is part of the Allison TCM programming. What is it? Shift Energy Management. It reduces torque to allow the mechanical springs to release the clutch once the trip solenoid de energizes the fluid flow to that Clutch.
If there is no defuel, or time to allow that clutch to release you will have more than 2 clutches applying at once and a fried transmission on your hands.
Not true. you dont need a 1939 to use a allision tcm. Defuel is not part of allison programing.With the tps % the tcm calulates how hard or soft its going to shift. An programing an the tcm aint no big deal.you can program the tcm so all it doesnt need the 1939
If there is no defuel, or time to allow that clutch to release you will have more than 2 clutches applying at once and a fried transmission on your hands.
Not true. you dont need a 1939 to use a allision tcm. Defuel is not part of allison programing.With the tps % the tcm calulates how hard or soft its going to shift. An programing an the tcm aint no big deal.you can program the tcm so all it doesnt need the 1939
#212
My TT DMX used to tow 65% of it's life. At GCVW and beyond 500 miles at a time over some of the most vicious mountain passes you could imagine.
Grapevine? =Speed Bump
4th of July = minor rise in elevation
Vantage, pretty good effort, if it was 20 mph slower and went on another 40 miles.
My truck was no Dyno queen either. It worked for my living. Why are you scared to hit the rollers in your current configuration??
Glad it's all working for you. The 'planets' must be aligned for you.
Grapevine? =Speed Bump
4th of July = minor rise in elevation
Vantage, pretty good effort, if it was 20 mph slower and went on another 40 miles.
My truck was no Dyno queen either. It worked for my living. Why are you scared to hit the rollers in your current configuration??
Glad it's all working for you. The 'planets' must be aligned for you.
Who ever said I am afraid of dynoing? I am waiting for some guys to give me a call from this site and we are heading to a dyno. What is it everybody wanting dyno numbers? You can a drive a 400 hp truck harder and tear more stuff up than somebody driving a 600 hp truck "normal". Alot of longevity depends on how well something is maintained and driven.
FDPOWER: RIGHT ON!! Some people still will disagree. What do ya do?
#213
If it works......which I think it does(just my .02, prolly worth less than that) cool. Duratothemax, I understand your thoughts of knowing the transmission inside and out but you seem a little nagative about this actualy working, shouldnt you be for the idea of a nearly indestructible drivetrain?
no no I know it works!! I already said in a previous post that it would be the best of both worlds (cummins/ally)
what I am saying is it is much simpler that gabe seems to be making it out to be, and Im lost with some of the things he is talking about, how things exactly work on his truck, and I dont exactly buy some of the things he says (no SEM whatsoever, no data bus comm between the ECM and TCM, that the TCM is standalone and will work on a 12 valve)
and the fact that the TCM's that hes using arent exactly "legit".
ben
#214
its because the Allison is a completely different trans and uses a compeltely different method of shifting/functioning.
ben
#215
so I can go to my local Allison dealer and have them build me a custom TCM from the ground up with me specifying all the options???????
is that why you pay 2000 dollars for suncoast's 6-speed TCM when you could bring a core TCM into the local ally dealer and have them load up a 6-speed cal?
#216
Defuel is part of the Allison TCM programming. What is it? Shift Energy Management. It reduces torque to allow the mechanical springs to release the clutch once the trip solenoid de energizes the fluid flow to that Clutch.
If there is no defuel, or time to allow that clutch to release you will have more than 2 clutches applying at once and a fried transmission on your hands.
If there is no defuel, or time to allow that clutch to release you will have more than 2 clutches applying at once and a fried transmission on your hands.
but I thought gabe's allison TCM has no defuel....? And I thought he said the allison doesnt need any defuel to shift??
ben
#217
Registered User
#221
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: St Paul , MN.
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got to the point of Dave being the only after market trans I wanted , and then I make the mistake of reading here and there and find more opptions .
Since the dollars are not in my pocket , I'm still reading .
And yes I have looked into ATS , BD ect. .
Now I'll have to see how cheap I could find a buildable Allison .
That brings the ? of yrs & souces to find the Allisons out of ?
Since the dollars are not in my pocket , I'm still reading .
And yes I have looked into ATS , BD ect. .
Now I'll have to see how cheap I could find a buildable Allison .
That brings the ? of yrs & souces to find the Allisons out of ?
#222
2001-2005 Allisons are all the same and are interchangable.
some MINOR differences include:
2001-2002 allison's had an older converter pump valve in them which could cause converter drainback if left sitting for a couple days and then being started (converter has to fill back up again, causing the trans to CLUNK into drive or limp itself)
2001-2002 allison's had an older style NSBU switch which could get water in it and fail, however allison came out with a replacment switch that fixes the problem. Most 01-02 allisons already have the updated switch as a result of the original failing.
2004.5+ allison's had a slightly different converter cutback valve/knockdown spring (I think thats what its called??) which in turned dropped line pressure a bit more in lockup than the 2001-2004 allison's did.
2005 allisons had a different G solenoid or something of the sort. Also in 2005 the PTO gear on the C1/C2 drum was replaced with a simple tone wheel because hardly anyone puts a PTO on the non chassis cab trucks. If you really want PTO on your late 04-05 allison, simply replace the C2 drum with one from a 01-04 truck when you rebuild it, thats it. When I rebuilt mine I put the older style C2 drum in with the PTO gear on it. Will I ever use the PTO? Probably not, but I figured I might as well add it while I was in there just for grins.
but as I said these differences are minor enough that every 01-05 allison is interchangable with no mods to the truck or TCM or anything.
as far as building the allison, my vote goes to suncoast all the way. Suncoast IV should do everyone just fine. Even a Suncoast III will hold over 500 rwhp. You can even just add a TransGo kit and Suncoast torque converter and hold a lot of power with stock clutches and eveyrthing else. Theres a dmax guy who has a set of Nathan's twins on his crew cab/short bed truck and runs 11.8x on fuel only...I forget what he dyno'd at but he only has a TransGo/triple disc TC in his trans and its holding fine.
I built mine with a Suncoast IV kit and its holding up 110% after 30,000 miles of daily abuse, towing, and 12 second passes. As for the torque converter, I love the 1057-3D. Much tighter and more aggressive coupling and "fun" to drive around town. Its unique in that its built from half a 1000 converter and the other half is from an allison medium duty transmission converter, hence the more aggressive closer coupling for heavyier medium-duty loads etc...
suncoast also offers the 1050 and 1056. 1056 has a closer feel to the 1057 than the 1050. The 1057 costs 200 dollars more than the 1056 and 1050 because it requires two cores to make (one from the gm pickup allison adn the other from a medium duty ally)
One of my buddies has a suncoast 1050-3D and his truck just feels "lazier" around town compared to mine. Obviously once all the converters are locked up there is no difference between any of them....
ben
some MINOR differences include:
2001-2002 allison's had an older converter pump valve in them which could cause converter drainback if left sitting for a couple days and then being started (converter has to fill back up again, causing the trans to CLUNK into drive or limp itself)
2001-2002 allison's had an older style NSBU switch which could get water in it and fail, however allison came out with a replacment switch that fixes the problem. Most 01-02 allisons already have the updated switch as a result of the original failing.
2004.5+ allison's had a slightly different converter cutback valve/knockdown spring (I think thats what its called??) which in turned dropped line pressure a bit more in lockup than the 2001-2004 allison's did.
2005 allisons had a different G solenoid or something of the sort. Also in 2005 the PTO gear on the C1/C2 drum was replaced with a simple tone wheel because hardly anyone puts a PTO on the non chassis cab trucks. If you really want PTO on your late 04-05 allison, simply replace the C2 drum with one from a 01-04 truck when you rebuild it, thats it. When I rebuilt mine I put the older style C2 drum in with the PTO gear on it. Will I ever use the PTO? Probably not, but I figured I might as well add it while I was in there just for grins.
but as I said these differences are minor enough that every 01-05 allison is interchangable with no mods to the truck or TCM or anything.
as far as building the allison, my vote goes to suncoast all the way. Suncoast IV should do everyone just fine. Even a Suncoast III will hold over 500 rwhp. You can even just add a TransGo kit and Suncoast torque converter and hold a lot of power with stock clutches and eveyrthing else. Theres a dmax guy who has a set of Nathan's twins on his crew cab/short bed truck and runs 11.8x on fuel only...I forget what he dyno'd at but he only has a TransGo/triple disc TC in his trans and its holding fine.
I built mine with a Suncoast IV kit and its holding up 110% after 30,000 miles of daily abuse, towing, and 12 second passes. As for the torque converter, I love the 1057-3D. Much tighter and more aggressive coupling and "fun" to drive around town. Its unique in that its built from half a 1000 converter and the other half is from an allison medium duty transmission converter, hence the more aggressive closer coupling for heavyier medium-duty loads etc...
suncoast also offers the 1050 and 1056. 1056 has a closer feel to the 1057 than the 1050. The 1057 costs 200 dollars more than the 1056 and 1050 because it requires two cores to make (one from the gm pickup allison adn the other from a medium duty ally)
One of my buddies has a suncoast 1050-3D and his truck just feels "lazier" around town compared to mine. Obviously once all the converters are locked up there is no difference between any of them....
ben
#223
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
great info!
also another FYI about dave goerend, talked to him about them and he just builds a triple disk converter and gets the rest of the parts from suncoast
also another FYI about dave goerend, talked to him about them and he just builds a triple disk converter and gets the rest of the parts from suncoast
#224
Registered User
#225
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and the fact that the TCM's that hes using arent exactly "legit".
Explain to me how they are not legit. Once you buy something its your to do what you want with.
Explain to me how they are not legit. Once you buy something its your to do what you want with.