47RE Input shaft
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
47RE Input shaft
Hey all, I have a question about how much power the stock input shaft on a 47RE can handle? I have a 2002 Dodge 2500 with the 47RE and some toys on it. I don't haul any trailers, but it does have power.
I have an Edge COMP, modified waste gate that allows the stock turbo to push 29PSI at WOT, billet Torque Converter, New stronger flex plate, AFE stage 2 intake and 4" open exhaust. I have 33" tires on the truck with 4.10 gear ratio, and on the Dyno it pushed 248rwhp. The guy I work with on the truck stated that I need more fuel, but I don't know how much more power I can get out of the 47RE without hurting it. The truck just hit 62,000 miles yesterday.
Also, I know with the stock 30" tires I could figure a 19-20% loss through the drive line to get the engine hp, but with the 33" how high do I need to figure to get the engine hp? Thanks
Link to dyno run video:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hSUrVArphIE&fmt=6
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zwWH_Uk0aBg&fmt=6
My friend said the sputtering is due to a lack of fuel, he recommended a FASS fuel system with some larger injectors and that should clear up the issue. He explained it to me as the Edge COMP is putting almost too much demand on the fuel system, and the fuel system can't deliver that much fuel, so the engine is not getting as much as it should. A larger fuel system and injectors would clear that up.
I have an Edge COMP, modified waste gate that allows the stock turbo to push 29PSI at WOT, billet Torque Converter, New stronger flex plate, AFE stage 2 intake and 4" open exhaust. I have 33" tires on the truck with 4.10 gear ratio, and on the Dyno it pushed 248rwhp. The guy I work with on the truck stated that I need more fuel, but I don't know how much more power I can get out of the 47RE without hurting it. The truck just hit 62,000 miles yesterday.
Also, I know with the stock 30" tires I could figure a 19-20% loss through the drive line to get the engine hp, but with the 33" how high do I need to figure to get the engine hp? Thanks
Link to dyno run video:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hSUrVArphIE&fmt=6
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zwWH_Uk0aBg&fmt=6
My friend said the sputtering is due to a lack of fuel, he recommended a FASS fuel system with some larger injectors and that should clear up the issue. He explained it to me as the Edge COMP is putting almost too much demand on the fuel system, and the fuel system can't deliver that much fuel, so the engine is not getting as much as it should. A larger fuel system and injectors would clear that up.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: eastern pa
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Put a fuel pressure gauge on it asap and see how it read. I bet you lift pump is shot. Hopefully you can save your vp from harm, and get a fuel pump setup on there quickly.
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I should state that this truck is not driven daily. Its driven MAYBE 50 miles a week, one or two days. I have a company car I drive on the weekdays. Also, the VP44 was replaced at 32,000 miles due to it had already failed. I am in the market to get a real fuel pump on the truck, which is why I am here, but I wanted to make sure that the inputshaft on the trans will not snap if I add 30-60 more HP.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: My head lays down in Murrieta, but the day light hours are spent in San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Your stock input shaft should be fine as you climb up to and maybe a little over 300hp. But keep in mind, "boosted" launch's, "power braking" and sled pulls will put more strain on that input shaft at those HP numbers. If you're easy on the throttle at take off's, it'll ok for now.
As for dieselrob's reply, he's just trying to help you. We've all seen more then enough VP-44 failures due to low fuel pressures. He's just trying to save you in the long run.
As for dieselrob's reply, he's just trying to help you. We've all seen more then enough VP-44 failures due to low fuel pressures. He's just trying to save you in the long run.
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your stock input shaft should be fine as you climb up to and maybe a little over 300hp. But keep in mind, "boosted" launch's, "power braking" and sled pulls will put more strain on that input shaft at those HP numbers. If you're easy on the throttle at take off's, it'll ok for now.
As for dieselrob's reply, he's just trying to help you. We've all seen more then enough VP-44 failures due to low fuel pressures. He's just trying to save you in the long run.
As for dieselrob's reply, he's just trying to help you. We've all seen more then enough VP-44 failures due to low fuel pressures. He's just trying to save you in the long run.
If we take the 248rwhp, and times it by roughly 22% to account for drive line loss, I get about 302 engine hp. Considering the factory was 235hp, and I am short in the fuel department, I would say I need more fuel. How much power could I get out of a larger fuel system, with say.... some stage 2 injectors? If I do that should I also get a shaft done, or just run with that for a while?
Trending Topics
#8
Or by the term "more fuel", do you mean a better lift pump?? Doesn't matter, I just thought those #'s were a little low which could point to a problem elsewhere.
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: My head lays down in Murrieta, but the day light hours are spent in San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
You're backwards. there is no driveline loss when you measure RWHP. You only factor in the driveline loss when you're talking about flywheel HP. So if your making 248rwhp, that means your truck is making 248 Horsepower at the rear wheels.
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I am straight on this, rwhp is not the same as flywheel hp. I was talking about 302 as flywheel hp, but 248 is what the wheels are putting to the pavement and making the truck move. although, I could be wrong
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: My head lays down in Murrieta, but the day light hours are spent in San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Well, if the Comp HAD the fuel available, yeah, the HP numbers would be more like 300HP. But if the liftpump is weak, there will NOT be enough fuel available. So the result will be low HP numbers.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: My head lays down in Murrieta, but the day light hours are spent in San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I do see where you're going. You're not wrong. I was confused on what you were trying to ask. But as for the driveline loss, I beleive it's only about 15%. But I could be wrong.
#15
I meant a better lift pump as mine is original and I don't think its doing enough.
No denying that a fuel system is in order, but personally, I think you have problems elsewhere too. A wire tap issue maybe??
Anyway, if you put on an aftermarket fuel system, I agree with JPR Ram, as long as you don't abuse it insanely, you should be fine on the stock input.