Other Everything else not covered in the main topics goes here. Please avoid brand and flame wars. Don't try and up your post count. It won't work in here.

Need Proof For Stupid Bet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2004 | 07:30 AM
  #1  
dieselminded's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Need Proof For Stupid Bet

Ok I made a statement and now I might eat my words

I said that there are more dead people in the world right now than there is living Im counting all dead egyptians and every thing we was just talking at work and some how it came up when I said it about 5 co workers looked @ me as if I was nuts they are 100% sure there are more people living right now then their is dead people.

some how I got it up to $20 Im sure Im right but I always think that

what do you think and how can I prove it ??
Old 10-11-2004 | 07:33 AM
  #2  
Shovelhead's Avatar
Administrator / Scooter Bum
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,085
Likes: 47
From: Central VA
Well if you count "Brain Dead",..... judging by most of the folks in Congress right now you could be right.
Old 10-11-2004 | 09:42 AM
  #3  
Commatoze's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: Sturbridge, Taxachusetts
Re: Need Proof For Stupid Bet

Originally posted by dieselminded
........more dead people in the world right now than there is living Im counting all dead egyptians and every thing......
....... I'd say you're wrong. But I don't know where to find an authoritative resource to confirm it. 6.4 billion living people is the current estimate.
Old 10-11-2004 | 11:17 AM
  #4  
chipset's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
I suspect you are right. However, proving it will be hard. But, think of the wars in the past. Look at the population of 100 years ago. Those people are all dead. I am guessing 3 billion by then. Here's a website show where 100 million people were in 1900. http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/20c-pop1.htm

Don't have proof, tho
Old 10-11-2004 | 12:51 PM
  #5  
TPilaske's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: Flat Rock, MI
That would be interesting... email: idb@census.gov and see if they know the stats!


Tony
Old 10-11-2004 | 01:51 PM
  #6  
Ray Roton's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: State of Confusion
I hope there will be more LIVE people voting than DEAD people
Old 10-11-2004 | 02:09 PM
  #7  
Lary Ellis (Top)'s Avatar
Admin Team Leader
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,514
Likes: 207
After making a bet of this nature, I think the question on stupidity has been totally confirmed
Old 10-11-2004 | 03:05 PM
  #8  
Commatoze's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: Sturbridge, Taxachusetts

I suspect you are right. However, proving it will be hard. But, think of the wars in the past. Look at the population of 100 years ago. Those people are all dead. I am guessing 3 billion by then. Here's a website show where 100 million people were in 1900. http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/20c-pop1.htm
Hmm...Maybe Agent Smith of the Matrix correct was when he said:

"You move to an area, and you multiply, and multiply, until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. A virus."
Old 10-11-2004 | 03:34 PM
  #9  
winkle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 1
From: Escondido, Calif
Here's another link that shows 1 billion in 1800

http://www.census.gov/ipc/prod/wp02/wp-02003.pdf
Old 10-11-2004 | 04:24 PM
  #10  
chipset's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Commatoze,

Perhaps right, sir. With one glaring exception. Virii only consume. They do not create their own food sources. At one point, humans did the same thing. They hunted and gathered. However, now we can produce our food in greater numbers than nature does naturally. This, of course, is why we have population centers. People gathered around, and prospered in, areas where food and resources to create food were abundant.

So, think back.... population boom, panic and rhertoric talking about how the world would not be able to feed all the people on the earth. And yet, in much of the world, food is more than abundant. If it weren't, you wouldn't be selective about the food you eat. In other parts of the world, that is not so. Africa comes to mind, but many of the problems associated with feeding Africans is not technological but political and corruption related.

I believe that it will take quite some time before we are unable to keep up food production for human consumption. It may happen, but it might take a threefold (or more) increase in the population long before we need to truly worry about it.
Old 10-11-2004 | 06:47 PM
  #11  
upersleder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: U.P. Mi.
i dont know for sure, but i feel you should be right, if there are 7 billion people now, and the 1 billion in 1800 are dead. people only recently started living into their 70s, so you have all the people living now versus all the people from the past 132,000-400,000 YEARS. how many people were alive and died in the roman era and the ancient egyptians. hell let me know if someone PROVES you wrong, i'll pay half! lets come up with a somewhat simple math formula for it.
Old 10-11-2004 | 09:06 PM
  #12  
12PACK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: Central MA
Re: Need Proof For Stupid Bet

Originally posted by dieselminded
how can I prove it ??
Grab a notebook and a pen and start at the cemetary closest to you. One, two, three....
Old 10-11-2004 | 09:32 PM
  #13  
bkrukow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 979
Likes: 1
From: boyden, IA
I have no way to prove it but I cant emagine that there is any way that there are more people on earth rite now than all of history combined. I mean come on think about it how old is the earth. There have been a lot of people come and go. That is like saying that if every person ever alive but now dead came back to life it wouldent equal what is alive rite now. Of course your rite. No question abought it. If they want proof jest tell them to ask the one and only person or being that knows for sure when they see him.
Old 10-11-2004 | 09:52 PM
  #14  
westcoaster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 33
well, I can account for 55,741,000 in a six year period.....
http://www.valourandhorror.com/DB/BACK/Casualties.htm

edit: and another 8,538,315 or if you would like to take the view that they would all be dead of old age now... 37,508,686.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWdeaths.htm
Old 10-11-2004 | 09:54 PM
  #15  
remarc31's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Texas
From all writings we're told of how civilizations were almost annihilated from famine and plague but no figure of how many died from those tragic situations.
Also I don't think anyone can say how many people have died in wars and other tragic occurances such as earthquakes, floods and etc. Who can say how many people have died of natural causes?

I believe you would be better off if you let them prove you wrong. I don't believe the 5 co workers can come up with a proven fact that more people are living now that there are dead ones. Throw the monkey on their backs.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.