VW TDI Owners... need advice
#16
#17
The worst take full was 37 and that was this winter in sub 0 temps. Usually get 41-42 and from what I have read at the TDI club that is about what the manuals are getting.
#18
My 2000 Jetta has 324,000 miles on it . It is a manual and has never got less than 48mpg and usually gets 52mpg. Beside regular maintance items car has never had a issue still on the original clutch even. I do a little side work on VW"s and I would stick with the A4 platform.
#19
My dad has a a 99 tdi with 121,000 on the clock. The motor, transmission and body are great, but in the colder climates, the electrical systems are a nightmare. This winter, at -25 F, he's sitting at the lights, all the windows roll down, the horn starts blowing and the car shuts itself off and won't start. $1,400 to fix that glitch. In the last 6 years, he's gone through 3 wiring harnesses for the drivers door (thin wire in winter does not work well), $240 for each harness and another 250 to put it in each time. The CEL is still on, says the injectors are bad, but they are all ok. Then the speedometer and temperature gauge quit, tach and fuel still works, that was another $1200 for a new cluster. Currently its for sale and he's now driving the 05 dodge 1 ton as a daily driver. Its cheaper...
#20
I have a '01 Beetle 5 speed and it's been a good little car. As far as power in the hills, we just got back from the Ozarks and could maintain whatever gear we were in as long as the rpms were kept above 1500. We pulled several 6% grades at 55mph and could have easily accelerated. From what I've read, 03 and newer use the more expensive oil that can only be bought from the dealer (I could be wrong on this) so that's why I went with the '01. Like I said, it's a great little car and gets excellent mileage (47 mpg last trip) but if your not secure enough in your manhood to drive one, you might want to stick to the Jetta of Golf.
#21
All hand calculated, well excel calculated on my phone, vent the tank every time til there is fuel sitting in the neck.
#22
My 03 Jetta TDI is great in the mountains of British Columbia. Very similar to what I am used to in my 06 CTD. We are not as high altitude as CO, but the Jetta certainly has no problem passing on the uphill grades we have here at 6500 feet. Amazing how much fun it is to drive with only 90hp!
#23
Tony
#24
We have had an 06 Jetta TDI 5 speed for 2 years and love it! We recently went down to Key West, drove 90+ mph the whole way (with Escort radar detector & police scanner) and still got 40mpg. I would definately recommend the manual tranny so you can use the excellent torque for the TDI motor. I wish I could afford the Touraeg V10 TDI!
#25
I've had a 2000 Jetta TDI for 4 years; like my 1911A2, my feelings for the 'dub run about like "from my cold, dead hands". I love it. Running homemade B100, I average 47MPG (700+ miles on @15 gallons). The car is bone stock, dependable as an anvil. Had a CEL, but it was a bad MAF sensor (talented VAG-COM guys rule!).
#26
We have had an 06 Jetta TDI 5 speed for 2 years and love it! We recently went down to Key West, drove 90+ mph the whole way (with Escort radar detector & police scanner) and still got 40mpg. I would definately recommend the manual tranny so you can use the excellent torque for the TDI motor. I wish I could afford the Touraeg V10 TDI!
#27
These cars CAN be pretty good and realible for a long time, and if driven enough miles, the mileage will make up for higher initial cost, 50k timing belt changes, farily expensive oil changes, EGR cleaning issues, possible fuel system issues (I've witnessed two in person with dead injection pumps before 100k), electrical system issues, $4.35/gallon fuel issues...
I guess I'll stick with my non-turbo Accord, although even as 5-speed it's not got the torque to get up hills assertively. However, I live in Illinois....
I guess I'll stick with my non-turbo Accord, although even as 5-speed it's not got the torque to get up hills assertively. However, I live in Illinois....
#28
These cars CAN be pretty good and realible for a long time, and if driven enough miles, the mileage will make up for higher initial cost, 50k timing belt changes, farily expensive oil changes, EGR cleaning issues, possible fuel system issues (I've witnessed two in person with dead injection pumps before 100k), electrical system issues, $4.35/gallon fuel issues...
I guess I'll stick with my non-turbo Accord, although even as 5-speed it's not got the torque to get up hills assertively. However, I live in Illinois....
I guess I'll stick with my non-turbo Accord, although even as 5-speed it's not got the torque to get up hills assertively. However, I live in Illinois....
#30
Thanks for the input guys. I've done a bit of research on the web and most of what I read is positive but it is nice to get some unbiased advice/input as well. I need the truck but using it as a daily driver is getting too expensive.
As for the power on the little v-Dubs, how are they on uphills? I work outside of Denver (elevation 5200), but live in the hills (elevation 8600). I love passing everyone on the climb home in the Ram and am curious as to what these little cars will be like. I plan on test driving one early next week to see if I like it. And yes, I realize there is a big difference between 350hp and 100hp!!! I'm only looking at the TDI's because I'd kill a gasser. The wife drives a Subaru Impreza and I hate the lack of power on the climbs!!
Thanks again for your input.
As for the power on the little v-Dubs, how are they on uphills? I work outside of Denver (elevation 5200), but live in the hills (elevation 8600). I love passing everyone on the climb home in the Ram and am curious as to what these little cars will be like. I plan on test driving one early next week to see if I like it. And yes, I realize there is a big difference between 350hp and 100hp!!! I'm only looking at the TDI's because I'd kill a gasser. The wife drives a Subaru Impreza and I hate the lack of power on the climbs!!
Thanks again for your input.