View Poll Results: Should manufacturers be required to limit speeds of big trucks to 68 m.p.h. ?
Yes , there is no need for them to go faster .
35
11.59%
No , they need to be able to run the speed limit
126
41.72%
Speed limiters should be required but at or slightly above 70 m.p. h.
41
13.58%
Speed should be controlled by local enforcement not manufacturers or ATA
123
40.73%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 302. You may not vote on this poll
Should manufacturers put 68 m.p.h. speed limiters on big trucks ?
#91
Apparently a lot of truckers think they can stop as quick as a car,because they will run 10 feet off your back bumper at 75mph.,in a line of traffic.but overall truckers are the safest drivers.
#92
I drive a truck. Sometimes I will tailgate too, and it surprises me how close I get the odd time. Its a real pain in the butt when you are on a 2 lane stuck behind slow traffic, but then once you hit a 4-lane, even on flat ground all the cars want to do 20 km/h faster. If traffic takes off from me on the 4 lane and then I catch up on the next 2 lane again, thats when I get right up close behind them.
#94
I agree that truckers are the safest drivers. I live Central Texas and Semis are not allowed to use the left lane. I live north of Austin and work downtown. It ain't the trucks slowing traffic, it is self-centered smuck in a hurry tap-dancing lanes.
#95
alright, i didn't read all of this stuff, but i am an OTR driver, and thought i would say a few things. in my opinon slow trucks can create a hazard, in that a lot of other vehicles will do some crazy stuff to get around them- the old "i can't drive behind a big truck" mentality. if a federally mandated governer was to be put in place, then there should also be a national speed limit. if the national speed limit was say 70 on open interstates, and the governer was 70-71, then i would be ok with it. also the owner ops. should have to comply, some of them give all of us a bad name. that being said, i am not a big advocate of government regulation. as some others have said, enforcment is key. in areas of heavy enforcement, people do drive slower and are less apt to do stupid stuff. as for the braking abilities of these trucks, if properly maintained, on dry pavement its really not that much worse than my '96 2500. i've said it before, i'll say it again. everyone needs to just relax out there, and cut each other a break. give someone else the right of way, it won't take more than a few seconds of your time and it might make both of you have a better day.
#96
That's probably the best answer because writing to truck industry trade publications drivers said the worst offendors of 55 m.p.h. speed limits in construction zones , etc. are the ones that have their trucks governed at 65 m.p.h. . They get passed in a 70 m.p.h. zone , then when the trucks that passed them slow to obey a 55 m.p.h. limit , here they come down the left lane proudly passing at 65 m.p.h. . I've seen it myself all the time . The problem is if vehicles were automatically forced to obey the speed limit states would lose too much revenue from not being able to ticket .
#97
A friend of mine just picked up his 5500 today it is governed to 75mph max speed. (6 sp auto) 4.44 gears@2500rpm=75mph..
While were governing things lets have the cell phone cut out.the fast food cut out, breath-alizer,dumb azz driver cut out, and last but not least communistic government cut out as well
While were governing things lets have the cell phone cut out.the fast food cut out, breath-alizer,dumb azz driver cut out, and last but not least communistic government cut out as well
#98
IMO, speed governors should be set by companies, not by the gov't or any agency.
I think it is better handled between a trucking company and/or O/O and the respective insurance company than by any gov't intervention.
If there is a legitimate safety enhancement to governors, insurance COs will give incentives to use them in the form of lower premiums.
Ins companies keep far better accident records than the gov't, because they have $$ at stake while the gov't just has politics at stake..
JMO
I think it is better handled between a trucking company and/or O/O and the respective insurance company than by any gov't intervention.
If there is a legitimate safety enhancement to governors, insurance COs will give incentives to use them in the form of lower premiums.
Ins companies keep far better accident records than the gov't, because they have $$ at stake while the gov't just has politics at stake..
JMO
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shortround
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
3
02-24-2004 10:33 AM