General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.

New Ford F450 Towing Test Video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2007 | 05:44 PM
  #16  
Wobblin-Goblin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by masterphreak
Did anyone else notice him say that the trailer was a fifth-wheel. It looked like a gooseneck hook-up to me.
While technically there is a difference, in everyday language the two are used interchangebly.

But yeah, it looked like a gooseneck to me, too.
Old 10-12-2007 | 06:04 PM
  #17  
Bluedeviltorque's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: The Hardware City
12K or 18K Which is it!?

My question was, why did the trailer weight "vary between 12K and 18K at different times"?

Could it not make it over the hill so they had to dump off 6K so it wouldn't blow up?

Mike
Old 10-12-2007 | 06:15 PM
  #18  
dieselJon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 1
From: Dixon, IL
Originally Posted by Bluedeviltorque
My question was, why did the trailer weight "vary between 12K and 18K at different times"?

Could it not make it over the hill so they had to dump off 6K so it wouldn't blow up?

Mike
Naw, that is when they got the CTD powered D350 dually out to pull it up the hill and keep up with traffic.
Old 10-12-2007 | 07:48 PM
  #19  
Wobblin-Goblin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
You guys crack me up. You're as bad as the Ford guys over at TheDieselStop.com.

Both trucks have their strengths and weaknesses and it pretty much comes down to personal preference for the reason why we pick a particular truck.
Old 10-13-2007 | 01:42 AM
  #20  
StrokeThisCTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: South Fork, Colorado
Its not about the truck being 4 months old. its about the truck doing what it was designed to do (pull heavy weights over varying terrain) and not having problems doing it. My F250 has the cooling system of an F550 on it. It will do what the manufacturer says it will do forever. The point of the video was to show that the truck will do what it was designed to do, over and over and over for 150,000 miles.
Old 10-13-2007 | 10:52 PM
  #21  
whereswaldo250's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 1
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Well I am glad to see such good feed back about the video It looked interesting
Old 10-14-2007 | 12:14 AM
  #22  
catmandoo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by StrokeThisCTD
Its not about the truck being 4 months old. its about the truck doing what it was designed to do (pull heavy weights over varying terrain) and not having problems doing it. My F250 has the cooling system of an F550 on it. It will do what the manufacturer says it will do forever. The point of the video was to show that the truck will do what it was designed to do, over and over and over for 150,000 miles.
at which point it eats it's pigs!
Old 10-14-2007 | 08:06 AM
  #23  
Diesel_Storm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
here is more proof that Ford is just envious of Dodge. Ford is touting the "Built Ford Tough", well in the early 80's on the Royal SE option package the badges read:

"Engineered Ram Tough"



picture is from an 82 Ramcharger.
Old 10-14-2007 | 11:53 AM
  #24  
essgeetee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 1
From: Arlington, Texas
Seems like it's a good truck. I hate the look of them now though, I don't understand why they tattooed SUPER DUTY all over the darn thing.
Old 10-14-2007 | 12:40 PM
  #25  
$oC@l CTD's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Manassas, VA
The only things that I have to say are I think that rating the engine DOWN for the F-450 from the F-350, regardless of gearing, is ABSURD. The truck is rated to tow MUCH more weight than the F-350, hence it NEEDING that extra power. On that note, that truck, when properly equipped (as it is) is rated to tow 24,500lbs, which means that at any given time during their testing, it was loaded 6,500-12,500lbs UNDER what it is rated at...if they really wanted some bragging rights, they should have put 24,500lbs behind it and THEN went out on their test run. Lastly, I agree with what was posted about how they were bragging about how quiet the interior, etc is...whether the truck was driven for 150,000 miles over a course of 4 months is irrelevant to how the noise integrity of the truck held up, because the truck was only 4 months old. I'm not knocking Ford's engineering, if you look around at some of my posts, I state that their interior/exterior engineering is the best of the three, in my opinion, but bragging about the sound integrity of a 4 month old vehicle is garbage. My truck only has 22k on it, but due to the fact that I have had mine for a year and 4 months, have offroaded in it, driven highways and rough side streets and back roads, etc, I already have a couple noise integrity issues...that stuff comes from wear and tear and things moving around a bunch...not 4 months of highway miles.
Old 10-14-2007 | 12:40 PM
  #26  
Raspy's Avatar
DTR's 'Wrench thrower...' And he aims for the gusto...
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 3
From: Smith Valley, NV (sometimes Redwood City, CA)
Originally Posted by XLR8R
"Planned Obsolescence"
That's it exactly!

And, of course, not suitable for highways in Alaska!! Even as a 450 it is not tough enough to drive highways up there. Well, there goes the Alaska market. It's just as well. When the engine quits on the Alcan highway you could be in real trouble.

John
Old 10-14-2007 | 12:50 PM
  #27  
Raspy's Avatar
DTR's 'Wrench thrower...' And he aims for the gusto...
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 3
From: Smith Valley, NV (sometimes Redwood City, CA)
Originally Posted by StrokeThisCTD
Its not about the truck being 4 months old. its about the truck doing what it was designed to do (pull heavy weights over varying terrain) and not having problems doing it. My F250 has the cooling system of an F550 on it. It will do what the manufacturer says it will do forever. The point of the video was to show that the truck will do what it was designed to do, over and over and over for 150,000 miles.

Well, not quite. It shows that the truck can haul a much lighter load than its advertised capacity over various HIGHWAYS and ONLY knock the front end out of alignment doing it.

I'm impressed, but it's not a favorable impression. Where's the beef?


John
Old 10-14-2007 | 02:37 PM
  #28  
Barry Smith's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Cookeville, Tn
I have to say that the F-450 is the best looking new truck out now. It's like a Fashion model w/ an STD... you know you shouldn't do it but you can't help yourself! You know you are going to be disappointed if you bye it. It is a great looking truck but after the last Powerstroke fiasco I'd be afraid.
And that 450 pulling a 12-18k trailer would be like me pulling a lawn mower trailer 150k. My old truck has 120k on it and has never had the front end aligned and I've pulled alot more than the 18k he was talking about.
Old 10-14-2007 | 02:39 PM
  #29  
Barry Smith's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Cookeville, Tn
Also if they have 4 or 5 test mules and thats the only one that made it????? 20% is not to good!
Old 10-14-2007 | 03:15 PM
  #30  
belgianmagic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Salem,nh/Port Tampa,Fl
(F) Freakin (O) Old (R) Rebuilt (D) DODGE... V8 150,000 MMMMMM GOOD...
I will stick with my 6 IN A ROW for 800,000 miles


Quick Reply: New Ford F450 Towing Test Video



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.