General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.

Here it is..How dissappointing...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2006 | 09:47 PM
  #1  
chaos24valve's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Litchfield Park, Arizona
Here it is..How dissappointing...

Well Guys heres the link to the new 2007 ram 3500....and with the 6.7 liter in it...the ratings are depressing. Made me want to cry. But hey, Ill still buy one!

Just thought ya'll would want to take a look!

2007 Ram 3500


And why is everything toned down so much? the 2003 and up Hemis had 345 not 330. And the Cummins had 325 HP that is weird..
Old 03-01-2006 | 09:54 PM
  #2  
graphitecumnz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
the Hemi in the 3500 has always been 330hp...
Old 03-01-2006 | 09:55 PM
  #3  
chaos24valve's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Litchfield Park, Arizona
Really I didnt know that. But then again, i am not a Hemi person!
But why would they tone the 6.7 down?
Old 03-01-2006 | 09:57 PM
  #4  
one54ton's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: L-town, NOR*CALi
I cant even image how de-tuned that motor is...
Old 03-01-2006 | 10:01 PM
  #5  
Beeram305's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Centennial, CO
Why would they do that? Reliability maybe?
Old 03-01-2006 | 10:13 PM
  #6  
derek840378's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: Crosby, TEXAS
the new 6.7-liter Cummins High Output Turbo Diesel with 305 horsepower and 610 lb.-ft. of torque
thats gotta be a typo. isnt the current 5.9 325 and 610? why would they have a larger engine have less power? just doesnt make any sense
Old 03-01-2006 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
chaos24valve's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Litchfield Park, Arizona
you're telling me....maybe they havent mated the new tranny to it so they have to power it down? Lol
Old 03-01-2006 | 11:22 PM
  #8  
BigBlueDodge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
You guys kill me. I can't tell how many times I've read that everyone wishes the Big 3 would stop the HP/TQ wars and concentrate on reliability and gas mileage. Now, when we see an engine (obviously detuned) with slightly less HP/TQ we all cry foul. I wan't to see the B ratings on this new engine, as well as hear some MPG reviews. Also, due to the bigger displacement I'd like to see some EGT numbers as well. I bet it will take some work to get this thing hot when towing.
Old 03-01-2006 | 11:30 PM
  #9  
rockittboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: vacaville, CA
pleeeeeeeeeenty of potential! yall sound like yall did years ago when they switched to 24 valves!
Old 03-02-2006 | 12:26 AM
  #10  
chaos24valve's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Litchfield Park, Arizona
I never said that I wanted that stuff, I just wanted an awesome engine! and when I heard 750 I about crapped myself so it was a bit of a let down, thats all. I could care less what my mileage is because right now I get about 12 miles to the gallon so anything would prolly be better....
Old 03-02-2006 | 12:36 AM
  #11  
BigBlue's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
52 gallon tank!!!!! Geez louise. I'd hate to pay that fuel bill. I want to see a dyno chart of that engine. I'll bet the power curves are nice and flat and maybe it's just slightly underrated.
Old 03-02-2006 | 12:46 AM
  #12  
chaos24valve's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Litchfield Park, Arizona
Just a little bit under rated right?...Only a tad...Lol. What I am wondering is why they dont have anything out on the Transmission?
Old 03-02-2006 | 05:17 AM
  #13  
rammtuff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Emissions.
Old 03-02-2006 | 05:32 AM
  #14  
SmokyDiesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by one54ton
I cant even image how de-tuned that motor is...
Think thats detuned a commercial industrial equiptment company puts the 6.7l in a off road forklift and the plate on the motor has them rated at WOW HOLD ON TO UR BUTT 190HP!!!!


Now thats detuned!!
Old 03-02-2006 | 07:13 AM
  #15  
MikeyB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,543
Likes: 4
From: Tomball, Texas
The reason for detuning the engine is for the drivers that run the crap out of it and won't take care of it. They also expect this truck to be exceeding GVW day in and day out. Just a little added margin for reliability.

MikeyB


Quick Reply: Here it is..How dissappointing...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.