General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

A Glass bottle used to observe fuel consumption?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2006 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
johnr9q's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca
A Glass bottle used to observe fuel consumption?

I recently purchased a module and am considering an overdrive unit to improve my fuel economy. I ran the module thru various trials to determine if it improved my fuel economy. Each trial was approximately 100 mileswhich eats up a lot of time and money. I have explored a mpg gauge (the one on the overhead isn't accurate enough) and can't find any. My next thot was to get a 3 gallon glass jar and put accurate graduations on it and mount it in the cab with me. I would fill the tank and then run a line from the small hose at the diesel fill location (I think the small hose is a vent hose for the tank) (I am referring to the fill location where you stick the nozzel to fill the truck - there is a large hose that goes directly to the tank and a smaller hose off to the side) I would disconnect the small hose and add a hose to the end of it and run it into my cab where I would have the 3 gallon glass jar. Gravity would keep the tank full as I drove down the road and the 3 gallon jar would empty. I could go at a constant speed and observe the fuel used with the graduations on the jar. This way I would get an accurate MPG reading without going many miles. Does anyone have an opinion as to if this idea would work or not? I wonder if the fuel cap seals adequately so fuel wouldn't escape? When the truck tank draws down where is air allowed into the tank to keep the tank pressure balanced and would this cause a problem with my idea?
Old 06-09-2006 | 11:11 PM
  #2  
big jimmy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
A glass jar is asking for serious trouble.

Anything carrying fuel in the cab is asking for trouble.

The tanks in or on our trucks are designed not to spill fuel in an accident.

Anyway, I know some will say this is being too careful. But if you have seen a burn victim from ignited fuel, you won't think the risk, however remote, is worth it. There are better ways to figure fuel consumption.

Big Jimmy
Old 06-10-2006 | 08:15 AM
  #3  
infidel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 14,672
Likes: 9
From: Montana
There is a very accurate fuel usage meter available but it will cost you>
http://www.floscan.com/html/blue/index.php
Old 06-10-2006 | 10:02 AM
  #4  
Rob Mitch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Central Texas
I believe you will have a change in fuel volume as the fuel in the tank warms up due to the fuel return from the injector pump.
Old 06-10-2006 | 11:29 AM
  #5  
dhvaughan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, GA.
don't do it. fuel in cab is bad. fuel in glass is bad.
patience grasshopper...why waste fuel - just wait until you actually going somewhere and hand calc.
Old 06-10-2006 | 03:49 PM
  #6  
johnr9q's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca
I should have said a clear bottle and I am only going to do it for short driving sequences where I am actually testing something. I will look into the floscan fuel flow meter that Infidel suggested, at West Marine on Monday. I have checked them before and pretty costly. Rob Mitch said: "I believe you will have a change in fuel volume as the fuel in the tank warms up due to the fuel return from the injector pump" With a full fuel tank I wonder how much this will effect the observations?
Old 06-11-2006 | 07:34 AM
  #7  
jrs_dodge_diesel's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 40
From: League City, TX


We use these on some of our Coast Guard Small boats. They work quite well and also keep track of total fuel burned that can be reset similar to the trip odometer reset.
Old 06-11-2006 | 09:27 AM
  #8  
Tree DR's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
From: A state of Missery (Missouri)
Try this www.scangauge.com I've been useing one for several different vehicles now. It may not be dead on its calculations to start with. Yes you can ajust it to match hand calculations. Once I had it corrected it was within .2 consistantly. Yes it shows instant MPG as well as Tank, Current trip, Today, Yesterday MPG. It also shows you MAP and Load, among other things.
Old 06-11-2006 | 11:52 PM
  #9  
johnr9q's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca
Tree DR: My Truck has an overhead miles per gallon gauge which isn't extremely accurate (within 15%). I talked to a fellow from scan gauge recently and he said if my overhead monitor wasn't accurate then I shouldn't expect the Scan Gauge to be any more accurate. He said their experience shows the Scan Gauge to be within 5% accuracy. Sounds like you are getting very accurate results from your scan gauge, is your overhead MPG gauge equally accurate?

Last edited by johnr9q; 06-11-2006 at 11:54 PM. Reason: changes
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ncj01
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
2
04-26-2014 02:36 AM
Nimrod
Other
1
10-06-2004 06:09 PM
okflyer
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
8
08-04-2004 06:08 AM
bkay
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
3
05-23-2003 12:36 PM
sullivad
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
24
02-14-2003 08:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.