General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.

Is DC shooting themselves in the foot??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2006 | 02:16 PM
  #31  
HappyGA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Waycross, GA
I think DC is making a pretty wise decision. It is easy for a line employee to screw up a job if they have hump-teen million different combinations to build something, so the less that is available, is less that the guys and gals on the production line have to think about. Not saying anything bad about them or anything, but I work in the mobile home industry, and the more options you ahve for a house, the more service calls you get from dealers because of something that was added that was not supposed to be, or something that was supposed to be there that isn't. Anytime you have these problems, you cut into your bottom line when you have to pay for someone to correct your mistake out of shop. Just my .02.
Old 07-06-2006 | 03:37 PM
  #32  
Michael1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Toto
I would not be surprised to see more "auto only" diesels...easier to control emmisions with a computer controled auto than a 'human controled' stick.
IMHO
At that point ("auto only") , I will stop buying them. If necessary, I'll move up in size, or rebuild/restore older ones.

Now that I think about it, I could always move to Europe, where people still enjoy driving, and manuals are readily available.

Michael
Old 07-06-2006 | 04:08 PM
  #33  
Luke S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Michael1
If you think the engine/drivetrain choices are bad for the Ram, for '07 GM isn't even offering a manual transmission for the Duramax. That's disgusting. See ya GM. I'm heading over to Dodge!

Michael
The Duramax with the 6-speed manual is a waste of a truck. I had two of them. Jerky shifting, and likes to eat clutches and flywheels. Less power than with the Allison, the trucks I had with the allison would run circle's around my 6-speeds loaded or empty, and were more reliable doing it, and any idiot could get in and drive them. Nobody who has much experience with both has any use for the 6-speed manual.
Old 07-06-2006 | 04:31 PM
  #34  
flashgordon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 1
From: WY
Originally Posted by Fronty Owner
There is a guy that I work out with, he had his truck in for the vibration when he noticed another guy chewing the manager out. The service manager told him that guy had been in half a dozen times for the drive line problem in his 1500 and they finally told him there was nothing else they could do.

Its not a cummins thing or a heavy duty thing, its a dodge truck thing.
the front drive line vibration is just that! the factory drivelines had to be order, sent to a drive line balance shop and the installed to get rid of the vibration.....bad batch is right....right off the assambly line!!!!
Old 07-06-2006 | 04:33 PM
  #35  
Mcmopar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by crunchybuttr
Personally, it seems like a terrific waste to put a gas engine in these trucks. Solar, i've seen the V-10 guy, and all I can say is . Longer life, better mileage, better torque, pretty much makes it a done deal for me. Drivetrain issues aside, for any HD use, diesel is the proven winner.

I don't know about that, the 5K upcharge for the CTD is steep, and will buy a bunch of gas. I only run my rig about 10K miles per year, the diesel will never pay for itself in mileage alone. Now the factor is something else.
Old 07-06-2006 | 07:16 PM
  #36  
tenbrooks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: covington,Ga
The big v-10s are not going to sell well these days, because of oil prices ,and the resale on a v-10 truck is less the than the v-8, at least around here anyway.
Old 07-07-2006 | 07:32 AM
  #37  
cincydiesel's Avatar
Muted one day, Banned the next....... Ah the life of a DTR 1%'er
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 0
From: Ohio: Home of the disappointing sports teams
Dad has one of the last remaining 03' Duallys with a v-10. I've never seen gas millage above 7 mpg's. How in the world would you afford to put gas in the thing.
Old 07-07-2006 | 08:03 AM
  #38  
Luke S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Everyone is diesel crazy. There are a lot of people who put less than 10k miles a year on a truck, and they could never justify a diesel. Especially with the lower mpg that the newer diesel's are getting, and soon to get lower with the jan-1-07 emissions looming. I have had two V10's, good engine's. We pulled our as hard as our diesels. I had one that was a 2wd that could get 12mpg empty. Not everyone needs or can justify diesel.
Old 07-07-2006 | 10:25 AM
  #39  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Originally Posted by Christov
...but despise a V6 for their sound.
Spoken like a man that's never driven a Nissan VQ engine.....My Maxima sounds SWEET ripping to 6500 rpm!
Old 07-07-2006 | 10:29 AM
  #40  
HOHN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 6
From: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Originally Posted by Mcmopar
I don't know about that, the 5K upcharge for the CTD is steep, and will buy a bunch of gas. I only run my rig about 10K miles per year, the diesel will never pay for itself in mileage alone. Now the factor is something else.
Exactly. For my usage, a Tacoma or Frontier would work just fine.

So why did I by a huge solid axle 2500 when I only need a glorified econobox with a large open air trunk?


For me, it's all in the combination. I wanted a truck, yes. But I also wanted more HP (hot-rodability) and I also wanted decent MPG, AND I wanted a truck that was tough and would last awhile.

As a truck shopper with mild hotrodding dreams and hopes of decent MPG in mid 2002, there simply was NO OTHER VEHICLE that could deliver. I basically had no choice but to buy a CTD or I'd give up mpg, power, durability, or capability....

jmo
Old 07-07-2006 | 12:18 PM
  #41  
Toto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 257
Likes: 1
From: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by HOHN
Spoken like a man that's never driven a Nissan VQ engine.....My Maxima sounds SWEET ripping to 6500 rpm!
That Nissan VQ is one ripper...open 'er up and it sounds like it's ready for the track.
One of, if not the best V6 engines evr made.
Old 07-07-2006 | 01:20 PM
  #42  
Mcmopar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Is that the 3.5 in the Murano, and Maxima?
Old 07-07-2006 | 09:35 PM
  #43  
Fronty Owner's Avatar
'People of Wal-Mart' 2010 finalist
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma/Texas
If you like the 3.5 VQ, check out the new 4.0 VQ in the fronty and X.
Old 07-08-2006 | 11:40 AM
  #44  
GO 4LO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
3.5 NA engine? Puh-leeeze - haven't you guys ever heard a nice Grand National? haha

Chris
Old 07-08-2006 | 04:10 PM
  #45  
induchman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 314
Likes: 1
From: on the road again
Originally Posted by triplenickle
Do all of you think that Dodge is hurting sales with the way that they have significantly reduced the # of engine models they offer in their trucks? Remember in the mid 90's or so, when in the 2500 models and up, you had the option of a 5.2 (2500), 360 (1500 2x4-3500 CC 4X4), and in the HD, the V10 and CTD.
Smart marketing. You need more engines than a V-6, a V-8, a V-10, a CTD and an MB?

DC is just plain smarter than Ferd and Cheby/GMC. After Cheby gets in bed with Nissan & Renault, they still won't be able to decide which engine goes with which powertrain.


Quick Reply: Is DC shooting themselves in the foot??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.