Is DC shooting themselves in the foot??
#31
I think DC is making a pretty wise decision. It is easy for a line employee to screw up a job if they have hump-teen million different combinations to build something, so the less that is available, is less that the guys and gals on the production line have to think about. Not saying anything bad about them or anything, but I work in the mobile home industry, and the more options you ahve for a house, the more service calls you get from dealers because of something that was added that was not supposed to be, or something that was supposed to be there that isn't. Anytime you have these problems, you cut into your bottom line when you have to pay for someone to correct your mistake out of shop. Just my .02.
#32
Originally Posted by Toto
I would not be surprised to see more "auto only" diesels...easier to control emmisions with a computer controled auto than a 'human controled' stick.
IMHO
IMHO
Now that I think about it, I could always move to Europe, where people still enjoy driving, and manuals are readily available.
Michael
#33
Originally Posted by Michael1
If you think the engine/drivetrain choices are bad for the Ram, for '07 GM isn't even offering a manual transmission for the Duramax. That's disgusting. See ya GM. I'm heading over to Dodge!
Michael
Michael
#34
Originally Posted by Fronty Owner
There is a guy that I work out with, he had his truck in for the vibration when he noticed another guy chewing the manager out. The service manager told him that guy had been in half a dozen times for the drive line problem in his 1500 and they finally told him there was nothing else they could do.
Its not a cummins thing or a heavy duty thing, its a dodge truck thing.
Its not a cummins thing or a heavy duty thing, its a dodge truck thing.
#35
Originally Posted by crunchybuttr
Personally, it seems like a terrific waste to put a gas engine in these trucks. Solar, i've seen the V-10 guy, and all I can say is . Longer life, better mileage, better torque, pretty much makes it a done deal for me. Drivetrain issues aside, for any HD use, diesel is the proven winner.
I don't know about that, the 5K upcharge for the CTD is steep, and will buy a bunch of gas. I only run my rig about 10K miles per year, the diesel will never pay for itself in mileage alone. Now the factor is something else.
#37
Muted one day, Banned the next....... Ah the life of a DTR 1%'er
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 0
From: Ohio: Home of the disappointing sports teams
Dad has one of the last remaining 03' Duallys with a v-10. I've never seen gas millage above 7 mpg's. How in the world would you afford to put gas in the thing.
#38
Everyone is diesel crazy. There are a lot of people who put less than 10k miles a year on a truck, and they could never justify a diesel. Especially with the lower mpg that the newer diesel's are getting, and soon to get lower with the jan-1-07 emissions looming. I have had two V10's, good engine's. We pulled our as hard as our diesels. I had one that was a 2wd that could get 12mpg empty. Not everyone needs or can justify diesel.
#40
Originally Posted by Mcmopar
I don't know about that, the 5K upcharge for the CTD is steep, and will buy a bunch of gas. I only run my rig about 10K miles per year, the diesel will never pay for itself in mileage alone. Now the factor is something else.
So why did I by a huge solid axle 2500 when I only need a glorified econobox with a large open air trunk?
For me, it's all in the combination. I wanted a truck, yes. But I also wanted more HP (hot-rodability) and I also wanted decent MPG, AND I wanted a truck that was tough and would last awhile.
As a truck shopper with mild hotrodding dreams and hopes of decent MPG in mid 2002, there simply was NO OTHER VEHICLE that could deliver. I basically had no choice but to buy a CTD or I'd give up mpg, power, durability, or capability....
jmo
#41
Originally Posted by HOHN
Spoken like a man that's never driven a Nissan VQ engine.....My Maxima sounds SWEET ripping to 6500 rpm!
One of, if not the best V6 engines evr made.
#45
Originally Posted by triplenickle
Do all of you think that Dodge is hurting sales with the way that they have significantly reduced the # of engine models they offer in their trucks? Remember in the mid 90's or so, when in the 2500 models and up, you had the option of a 5.2 (2500), 360 (1500 2x4-3500 CC 4X4), and in the HD, the V10 and CTD.
DC is just plain smarter than Ferd and Cheby/GMC. After Cheby gets in bed with Nissan & Renault, they still won't be able to decide which engine goes with which powertrain.