800 Ft/lbs 6.7 Cummins
11-19-2010, 05:29 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
800 Ft/lbs 6.7 Cummins
I've been traveling for a while with the fiver so, I don't know if this has been posted. I did a search and did not find anything.
The 6.7 used in the new Motorhomes is rated at 800 ft/bls of torque. So, its here, Ferd don't have nothing on this and for sure you won't find a Ferd 6.7 in a Motorhome.
http://cumminsengines.com/sites/ever...ection=ratings
Get you some of that !!!!!!!!
Dave
The 6.7 used in the new Motorhomes is rated at 800 ft/bls of torque. So, its here, Ferd don't have nothing on this and for sure you won't find a Ferd 6.7 in a Motorhome.
http://cumminsengines.com/sites/ever...ection=ratings
Get you some of that !!!!!!!!
Dave
11-20-2010, 05:26 PM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is everyone so obsessed with hp and torq numbers? So what if Ford or Chevys are higher, All i know is either of my 2 Dodges will pull anything I have ever tried with no problems. Let ford and chevy brag all they want, as they know neither of them will ever outlast a Cummins
11-23-2010, 05:57 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yuba city Kalifornia
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
x2 my 01 is at 335/800 now and it will pull anything I got up any hwy and never kick out the cruise control .If Cummins wanted to the 6.7 would be pushing 1000lbs but first get the MPGs back up in the mid 20s and that would be something to crow about
Trending Topics
11-23-2010, 07:32 PM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Marshall, Texas
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-03-2010, 04:51 PM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palmer Alaska
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If they told me that the I could have 800lb of tq and 400 hp or 350hp and 650 tq, I would take the 400/800 in a heart beat. I am actually waiting for them to bump up power so I can buy a new cummins.
12-03-2010, 09:50 PM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last I checked you can't see Nox and all trucks that don't have a Dpf will produce soot, I idle my stock 98.5 which will never smoke next to my shed which is white, and you can see the soot mark on the side. We get trucks at work with 300k on them that have DPFs, and the stacks will have no soot, that means the air coming out is pretty soot free. I don't like it anymore then the next guy, just saying.
12-04-2010, 08:23 AM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last I checked you can't see Nox and all trucks that don't have a Dpf will produce soot, I idle my stock 98.5 which will never smoke next to my shed which is white, and you can see the soot mark on the side. We get trucks at work with 300k on them that have DPFs, and the stacks will have no soot, that means the air coming out is pretty soot free. I don't like it anymore then the next guy, just saying.
And yes...ALL my trucks produce soot
Chris
12-04-2010, 09:23 AM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I honestly don't know, I would assume it is because soot can stay suspended in the air and cause breathing problems, it "appears" dirty. I like alittle black smoke personally. I'm by no mean a tree hugger.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BEHRMAN
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
11
04-26-2005 09:07 PM
JImbo1
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
1
08-27-2003 08:13 AM