2007 Heavy Duty Shootout
#1
2007 Heavy Duty Shootout
Gas and Diesel, 6.7 vs 6.4 vs Duramax
V10 vs Hemi, vs 6.0L Vortec
7% grade, 15% grade, towing 10,500#
I can't wait for parts 2 and 3.
** I found a mistake as well. The GVWR listed for the 3500 QC Dually Dodge is wrong. They list it as 10,100# which is the GVWR for a 3500 SRW. The 3500 Dually is 12,200#. The Ford guys over at RV.net say the F350 GVWR is wrong too.
http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2007...shootout1.html
V10 vs Hemi, vs 6.0L Vortec
7% grade, 15% grade, towing 10,500#
I can't wait for parts 2 and 3.
** I found a mistake as well. The GVWR listed for the 3500 QC Dually Dodge is wrong. They list it as 10,100# which is the GVWR for a 3500 SRW. The 3500 Dually is 12,200#. The Ford guys over at RV.net say the F350 GVWR is wrong too.
http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2007...shootout1.html
#2
Reading it now, looks good.
----
I'm gonna edit this as I read it.
----
----
No offence to dmax owners, but this this is UGLY.
----
The F-450 had the same 6.4-liter PSD as the F-350, but due to the truck’s very low final drive ratio, power was detuned to 325-horsepower and 600 lbs-ft of torque. This is a new power management approach from Ford that we believe is used to increase engine life.
LOLOLOL
----
Why couldn't they have just finished it up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now I'll have to wait a few more weeks to see it all finished.
----
I'm gonna edit this as I read it.
----
When we started it up, the Ram visibly shivered from all of the torque as the Cummins cranked over.
No offence to dmax owners, but this this is UGLY.
----
The F-450 had the same 6.4-liter PSD as the F-350, but due to the truck’s very low final drive ratio, power was detuned to 325-horsepower and 600 lbs-ft of torque. This is a new power management approach from Ford that we believe is used to increase engine life.
LOLOLOL
----
Why couldn't they have just finished it up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now I'll have to wait a few more weeks to see it all finished.
#7
Reading it now, looks good.
----
I'm gonna edit this as I read it.
----
----
No offence to dmax owners, but this this is UGLY.
----
The F-450 had the same 6.4-liter PSD as the F-350, but due to the truck’s very low final drive ratio, power was detuned to 325-horsepower and 600 lbs-ft of torque. This is a new power management approach from Ford that we believe is used to increase engine life.
LOLOLOL
----
Why couldn't they have just finished it up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now I'll have to wait a few more weeks to see it all finished.
----
I'm gonna edit this as I read it.
----
----
No offence to dmax owners, but this this is UGLY.
----
The F-450 had the same 6.4-liter PSD as the F-350, but due to the truck’s very low final drive ratio, power was detuned to 325-horsepower and 600 lbs-ft of torque. This is a new power management approach from Ford that we believe is used to increase engine life.
LOLOLOL
----
Why couldn't they have just finished it up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now I'll have to wait a few more weeks to see it all finished.
Trending Topics
#10
I cant stand the tailpipe on the Chubbys. I would hang that sucker on something in no time. It looks ok in that pic but the ones I see around have this god awful piece of pipe hangin' out the back.
#11
Well today I went out and test drove a new 6.7L CTD, fully loaded, laramie quad cab 4x4 minus the navigation system. I was very impressed with the power, the tranny was very nice along with the selectable gear deal (nothing new I know but still neat the way Dodge set it up). It was a hair laggy on the bottom but the turbo took a fraction of a second to spool up and take off. Also, it was QUIET! I'm used to my straight piped 12v and this thing was whisper quiet. Overall I was very impressed with the 6.7, nothing wrong with it in my eyes (besides the new emissions equipment )
Now if I could only get my old man to trade his 04' Nissan Titan off .
But back on topic, this review seems to be fairly legit, trying to make it as fair as possible. It'll interesting to see how the trucks stack up.
Now if I could only get my old man to trade his 04' Nissan Titan off .
But back on topic, this review seems to be fairly legit, trying to make it as fair as possible. It'll interesting to see how the trucks stack up.
#12
http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2007...shootout4.html
Why couldn't they just get a Dodge Cummins with the 3.73 gears, like both of the other diesels? Why put in a Dodge with 4.10s? Geesh! IF they are trying to make it as even across the board as possible....that is a really simple and no brainer thing IMO.
Why couldn't they just get a Dodge Cummins with the 3.73 gears, like both of the other diesels? Why put in a Dodge with 4.10s? Geesh! IF they are trying to make it as even across the board as possible....that is a really simple and no brainer thing IMO.
#13
#14
Trying to keep it even as possible, eh? Why do both the Dodge and GM have V8 gas engines and they put a Ford in there with a V10?
Does Ford not offer a V8 gas engine in their heavy duty trucks? Or are they just setting Ford up to win again like last year?
Does Ford not offer a V8 gas engine in their heavy duty trucks? Or are they just setting Ford up to win again like last year?
#15
But you're right, they should have gotten a truck with the 5.4 to make it equal.