General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.

2006 cleaner diesel mandate retroactive?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2005 | 11:54 AM
  #1  
mestdagh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Between Boulder & Crestone, CO
2006 cleaner diesel mandate retroactive?

Will this affect pre-2006 diesel models? Thanks.
Old 03-08-2005 | 12:05 PM
  #2  
Shovelhead's Avatar
Administrator / Scooter Bum
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,085
Likes: 47
From: Central VA
I would think that it would be very difficult to expect older vehicles still on the road to conform to the new higher standard clean-air specifications as brand new vehicles.
They don't do it with gassers.
Old 03-08-2005 | 12:11 PM
  #3  
Lightman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
Mesdagh - not sure what you're talking about. If you're speaking of the country's conversion in 2006 to ultra low sulfur diesel - that's a change in fuel quality that will not affect pre 2006 vehicles - aside from possibly needing a lubricity additive.

I'm not aware of new vehicle emissions standards, but as always, older models are grandfathered in those cases.
Old 03-08-2005 | 12:49 PM
  #4  
mestdagh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Between Boulder & Crestone, CO
Good news about the grandfathering...

I thought I heard there was a change in emissions standards also. I did a bit of searching and it looks like there will be a new diesel emissions standard in 2007 ... but it looks like it's only for heavy duty engines and buses. So I think we are safe.
Old 03-08-2005 | 04:29 PM
  #5  
Lightman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
Don't quote me on the grandfathering, but that's how it's been traditionally. They can't expect folks to spend money to convert older vehicles to new standards.
Old 03-10-2005 | 12:28 AM
  #6  
tempforce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Southwestern Oregun
with the new ultra low sulfur diesel, all diesel trucks will have lower emissions.
of course we will need to add a lubricity additive.
b-5 would work (5% bio-diesel), lucas or other additive's.
most of the auto makers are making diesel cars and trucks that can't meet our emissions standards now, are being sold in other country's, these same cars and trucks will pass emissions with uls fuel.
Old 03-10-2005 | 11:03 AM
  #7  
edwinsmith's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,262
Likes: 1,048
From: Commerce, OK
Originally posted by Lightman


I'm not aware of new vehicle emissions standards, but as always, older models are grandfathered in those cases.
That's because politicians don't like being lynched.

Will the PS diesel additive (white bottle) add enough lubricity to offset the loss of sulfur.

Edwin
Old 03-10-2005 | 12:31 PM
  #8  
Lightman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
First of all the fuel producers will be required to add a lubricity enhancer to all ULSD to compensate for this problem. So as it is now, it will likely run just fine with no additives in our vehicles. However, there are some folks that like the insurance of putting them in themselves, myself being one of them. I have a case sitting around of stanadyne lubricity formula - which contains 4x the lubricity of their performance formula, and none of the other elements. Since I don't agree with Stanadyne's method of demulsification, I will continue to use my redline additives, with a shot of the lubricity formula or biodiesel. I prefer the bio route.
Old 03-10-2005 | 01:24 PM
  #9  
got...DIESEL?'s Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Juneau, ALASKA
The "older" p7100 pumps need 5% sulfur minimum, not sure about the older VP's or the new ones. Most don't know it, but alot of areas, including mine are only at 3%....even the heavy stuff. I spike my fuel with lucas and can hear the difference in the pump.

FYI

Chris
Old 03-10-2005 | 01:52 PM
  #10  
signature600's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, Ohio
I didn't think sulphur was the lubricating agent in diesel fuel????

I'd rather run bio(soy) anyway
Chris
Old 03-10-2005 | 01:59 PM
  #11  
edwinsmith's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,262
Likes: 1,048
From: Commerce, OK
What about just dumping in some motor oil? Two cycle oil?
Old 03-10-2005 | 03:38 PM
  #12  
Lightman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally posted by signature600
I didn't think sulphur was the lubricating agent in diesel fuel????

I'd rather run bio(soy) anyway
Chris
The refining process that removes sulfur for LSD and ULSD simultaneously strips the fuel's lubricity as a side effect of the process. Sulfur is not the lubricant, but as you can expect from what I just stated, high sulfur fuel has much higher lubricity..
Old 03-10-2005 | 08:49 PM
  #13  
Fueling around's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: Northwest, Minnesota USA
Originally posted by got...DIESEL?
The "older" p7100 pumps need 5% sulfur minimum, ...
Your decimal points are a bit off
Current on-road diesel is low sulfur fuel at 500 ppmw or 0.05%
Originally posted by Lightman
First of all the fuel producers will be required to add a lubricity enhancer to all ULSD to compensate for this problem. ...
Where?
I talked to a major midwest refinery rep 2 weeks ago about ULSF. They have no requirement to add lubricity.
Originally posted by tempforce
with the new ultra low sulfur diesel, all diesel trucks will have lower emissions.
of course we will need to add a lubricity additive. ...
What you write is partially true. Sulfur bearing emissions are lower. ULSF itself does not lower NOx or Hydrocarbon (HC) emissions. It slightly reduces Particulate Matter (PM) emissions.

The big reduction is gained by adding a PM scrubber or diesel particulate filter (DPF). That will be retroactive on many school and transit buses.
Old 03-10-2005 | 08:54 PM
  #14  
Lightman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
There is a lot of talk going around about lubricity standards and I've read and heard from a few industry experts that it's likely to be imposed as a requirement. I shoudn't have said that it was as a definite. In any case, requirement or not, most ULSD manufacturers are additizing ULSD to compensate for the lost lubricity.
Old 03-10-2005 | 09:02 PM
  #15  
Fueling around's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: Northwest, Minnesota USA
LOL
I was just replying to you in the "burning oil?" thread.
The guy at Koch refinery said they know the fuel will be very dry after the de-sulfuring process, but haven't decided to add lubricity. Here in Minnesota, the lubricity issue will be a non issue. By July, all diesel will have 2% bio.

-John


Quick Reply: 2006 cleaner diesel mandate retroactive?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.