Competition / Pulls / OffRoad You wanted it, well you got it. The competition and pulling forum. Please have your racing, pulling and other competition posts here. No East Coast vs. West Coast, and no flame wars!

Plunger Lift vs Timing vs Math?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2006, 07:27 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
satburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Versailles, MO
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Plunger Lift vs Timing vs Math?

HTML Code:
	215hp
BTDC     Lift    Diviser	Difference
9.5	NA		
10	NA		
10.5	NA		
11	NA		
11.5	4.70	2.446809	0.053191
12	4.80	2.500000	0.056237
12.5	4.89	2.556237	0.054205
13	4.98	2.610442	0.052280
13.5	5.07	2.662722	0.050456
14	5.16	2.713178	0.048726
14.5	5.25	2.761905	0.041834
15	5.35	2.803738	0.040298
15.5	5.45	2.844037	0.013106 <-- ???
16	5.60	2.857143	
16.5	5.68	2.907143	
17	5.75	2.957143	
17.5	5.82	3.007143	
18	5.89	3.057143	
18.5	5.95	3.107143	
19	6.02	3.157143	
19.5	6.08	3.207143	
20	6.14	3.257143	
20.5	6.20	3.307143	
21	6.26	3.357143	
21.5	6.31	3.407143	
22	6.36	3.457143	
22.5	6.42	3.507143	
23	6.47	3.557143
Ok, so I'm sitting down here with an Excel spreadsheet and got my CPL chart copied from over at DodgeOrg and something just doesn't add up... Mainly the part where we compare the lift @ 16 degrees. Up until that point for every 1/2 degree of time we increase the lift by the ratio from the previous degree's formula + .05

But at 16 degrees, the math stops working. 5.6mm of lift is what I would expect for 16.5 degrees of timing not 16. As you can see above the 'Difference' column is the difference in the diviser between the current timing and the previous one. So if we let the formula handle the timing for 16 degrees and assume the additional .05 for each 1/2 degree of time, we get this:

HTML Code:
	215hp
BTDC     Lift    Diviser	Difference
9.5	NA		
10	NA		
10.5	NA		
11	NA		
11.5	4.70	2.446809	0.053191
12	4.80	2.500000	0.056237
12.5	4.89	2.556237	0.054205
13	4.98	2.610442	0.052280
13.5	5.07	2.662722	0.050456
14	5.16	2.713178	0.048726
14.5	5.25	2.761905	0.041834
15	5.35	2.803738	0.040298
15.5	5.45	2.844037	0.050000
16	5.53	2.894037	
16.5	5.60	2.944037	
17	5.68	2.994037	
17.5	5.75	3.044037	
18	5.82	3.094037	
18.5	5.88	3.144037	
19	5.95	3.194037	
19.5	6.01	3.244037	
20	6.07	3.294037	
20.5	6.13	3.344037	
21	6.19	3.394037	
21.5	6.24	3.444037	
22	6.30	3.494037	
22.5	6.35	3.544037	
23	6.40	3.594037
So which is it? Or is my math based thinking off and I need to take a nap?
Old 10-13-2006, 12:05 PM
  #2  
Chapter President
 
Lil Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Red Deer, Alberta Canada
Posts: 6,102
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A cam lobes profile is not linear. As the cam lobe begins to get closer to TDC the rate of rise is parabolic and slows rapidly. As you advance your timing you are getting closer to TDC earlier in the cycle and less lift is attained for more degrees of crank rotation. Does that help??
Old 10-15-2006, 08:49 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
joefarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: stupid ohio
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What Lil Dog said. The cam is egg-shaped and will lift at various rates depending on where you are at in the cam profile.

brandon.
Old 10-15-2006, 09:24 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
satburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Versailles, MO
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well I'll concede and agree with you guys that the cam lobe isn't a perfect circle (or triangle), however by watching the gauge as I roll the engine over and looking at the amount of lift I'm getting, I guess I'm somewhat surprised to start seeing such a distinct change start occurring @ 16 degrees. To me it seems that the rate of lift is still rather uniform all the way up to the .248 inches @ 22 degrees as it is down @ .22 inches. I haven't substantiated it by taking measurements at different rotation degrees to confirm, but the lift "seems" uniform at least between what I see from 13 degrees to what I've blindly said lift should be at 22 degrees.

My question has now changed then, is there an accurate chart that does show lift vs. timing up to 25 degrees?
Old 10-15-2006, 10:36 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for sharing..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aksparkey01
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
6
03-10-2008 07:08 PM
Chrisf
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
3
10-10-2007 06:53 PM
kd460
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
1
07-20-2007 11:10 AM
AMT
HELP!
3
02-23-2006 03:07 PM
greasy
HELP!
15
12-16-2004 02:52 PM



Quick Reply: Plunger Lift vs Timing vs Math?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.