ULSD 15ppm - BEWARE!! - MUST READ!!!
#46
I NEVER SAID that oil companies are out to get us, nor did I state any "conspiracy theories", or that they want our trucks to fail!
If that is what you got out of my posts, then you read and added unto it, as I never stated those things. What I did state is that the new ULSD is being shoved down our tanks by the EPA and that the refineries went with the least cost approach method. The EPA does NOT care about the lubricants that went missing since they switched to ULSD. Secondary agencies had to pick up the ball where they dropped it. There are studies and facts showing that the LACK-OF lubricant in the new ULSD may cause problems down the road.
Are the refineries worried about it? NO
Is the EPA worried about it? NO
Who will pay for it, if and when, things fail? YOU
That was all I wanted to point out. You started to make statements that I NEVER made. You put a "spin" on it to make me say something I never said. Please quote me next time.
If that is what you got out of my posts, then you read and added unto it, as I never stated those things. What I did state is that the new ULSD is being shoved down our tanks by the EPA and that the refineries went with the least cost approach method. The EPA does NOT care about the lubricants that went missing since they switched to ULSD. Secondary agencies had to pick up the ball where they dropped it. There are studies and facts showing that the LACK-OF lubricant in the new ULSD may cause problems down the road.
Are the refineries worried about it? NO
Is the EPA worried about it? NO
Who will pay for it, if and when, things fail? YOU
That was all I wanted to point out. You started to make statements that I NEVER made. You put a "spin" on it to make me say something I never said. Please quote me next time.
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I NEVER SAID that oil companies are out to get us, nor did I state any "conspiracy theories", or that they want our trucks to fail!
If that is what you got out of my posts, then you read and added unto it, as I never stated those things. What I did state is that the new ULSD is being shoved down our tanks by the EPA and that the refineries went with the least cost approach method. The EPA does NOT care about the lubricants that went missing since they switched to ULSD. Secondary agencies had to pick up the ball where they dropped it. There are studies and facts showing that the LACK-OF lubricant in the new ULSD may cause problems down the road.
Are the refineries worried about it? NO
Is the EPA worried about it? NO
Who will pay for it, if and when, things fail? YOU
That was all I wanted to point out. You started to make statements that I NEVER made. You put a "spin" on it to make me say something I never said. Please quote me next time.
If that is what you got out of my posts, then you read and added unto it, as I never stated those things. What I did state is that the new ULSD is being shoved down our tanks by the EPA and that the refineries went with the least cost approach method. The EPA does NOT care about the lubricants that went missing since they switched to ULSD. Secondary agencies had to pick up the ball where they dropped it. There are studies and facts showing that the LACK-OF lubricant in the new ULSD may cause problems down the road.
Are the refineries worried about it? NO
Is the EPA worried about it? NO
Who will pay for it, if and when, things fail? YOU
That was all I wanted to point out. You started to make statements that I NEVER made. You put a "spin" on it to make me say something I never said. Please quote me next time.
LOL, did you EVER think the EPA cared about you or your truck?
And No diddly you have to pay for repairs to your truck from ULSD, thats a no brainer. Did you think they will help you out? LOL.
Again, you are making it out to be an all out epidemic. Run an additive and quit crying.
Nothing will be changed from people complaining about their trucks having issues later on in life, nor will the EPA ever get less stringent.
As for quoting anything, you've got plenty of these to let us know how important it all is. How everyones trucks will fail now, and were all screwed!!!! OH NOES!
There are plenty in this very thread that have seen the "sky is falling" that youve been promoting.
The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Give me a break...
Why is everyone still talking about this? In CA we have had ULSD for the past year, and nothing but ULSD since September. And my truck has run it exclusively (11k miles). I don't use additives regularly and don't have a problem. My truck runs smooth and quietly and has no issues.
Why is everyone still talking about this? In CA we have had ULSD for the past year, and nothing but ULSD since September. And my truck has run it exclusively (11k miles). I don't use additives regularly and don't have a problem. My truck runs smooth and quietly and has no issues.
Again, since you still arent getting it.
Run an additive and dont turn a mole hill into a mountain.
#48
pet05, thanks for bringing up the ULSD issue again. I think the more people that know about it's effects, and the alternatives, the better it is for all of us. There are more bio plants popping up all the time, and I hope this trend continues. The way I see it, every gallon of biodiesel is one less gallon coming from some foreign country that just needs the money to make bombs to blow us up anyway.
I suggest you research the environmental impacts of bio diesels before praising it.
If we want to lessen foreign oil dependency we as a nation need to decrease our consumption. Purchasing a 3/4 or 1 ton truck for personal transportation does not help. So unless you absolutely require a heavy duty diesel or gas powered pickup/suv for your work you are contributing to the importation of foreign crude from the "bomb to blow us up" nations. And with the attitude of Americans that will never happen, unless the govt rations fuel and they are forced to.
Has anyone calculated what MMO, seafoam etc cost you per mile? Diesel fuel is 35 cents more per gallon here in FL. Roughly 12% If I am required to add even more money to my fuel tank each fill-up where is the benefit of a diesel engine?
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Royse City TX
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Posts like this, ladies and gentlemen, is why most of the world thinks Americans are dumb.
I suggest you research the environmental impacts of bio diesels before praising it.
If we want to lessen foreign oil dependency we as a nation need to decrease our consumption. Purchasing a 3/4 or 1 ton truck for personal transportation does not help. So unless you absolutely require a heavy duty diesel or gas powered pickup/suv for your work you are contributing to the importation of foreign crude from the "bomb to blow us up" nations. And with the attitude of Americans that will never happen, unless the govt rations fuel and they are forced to.
Has anyone calculated what MMO, seafoam etc cost you per mile? Diesel fuel is 35 cents more per gallon here in FL. Roughly 12% If I am required to add even more money to my fuel tank each fill-up where is the benefit of a diesel engine?
I suggest you research the environmental impacts of bio diesels before praising it.
If we want to lessen foreign oil dependency we as a nation need to decrease our consumption. Purchasing a 3/4 or 1 ton truck for personal transportation does not help. So unless you absolutely require a heavy duty diesel or gas powered pickup/suv for your work you are contributing to the importation of foreign crude from the "bomb to blow us up" nations. And with the attitude of Americans that will never happen, unless the govt rations fuel and they are forced to.
Has anyone calculated what MMO, seafoam etc cost you per mile? Diesel fuel is 35 cents more per gallon here in FL. Roughly 12% If I am required to add even more money to my fuel tank each fill-up where is the benefit of a diesel engine?
Maybe you should purchase a new Toyota Hybrid if you can afford it. That way when the rationing starts you'll be ready.
#50
Registered User
"I think we, as a nation, should use the best military force in the history of this planet to take the energy supplies that we want, need and deserve - especially petroleum... just think of it as eminent domain - it's the American Way! "
- Political Darwinist
- Political Darwinist
#51
RammTuff -
Looking at your truck you have 190,000 miles on it. THAT is one of the benefits of having a diesel truck.
How many things did you need to replace during that time?
Looking at your truck you have 190,000 miles on it. THAT is one of the benefits of having a diesel truck.
How many things did you need to replace during that time?
#52
Registered User
"The refiners ARE NOT adding lubricity agents to this new fuel at the refinery.
The short answer is they could, but they are NOT allowed to.These pipelines carry diesel, home heating oil, jet fuel, gasoline and various other products. When fuel containing a lubricity agent is pumped through a pipeline the lubricity agent coats the pipeline and wants to stay in place, however when the next product is pumped through the line, inevitably some of this agent comes off and is carried off in the new product. The Lubricity agents are considered contaminants in Jet fuels, and due to concerns over potential liability, nearly all of the pipeline carriers have banned these agents from their pipelines."
Help me understand something........ they wont add lubrication to the diesel because of fear of contamination in jet fuel. What percentage of additive is in the diesel. Dont you think the actual diesel or gas or whatever would contaminate the jet fuel more than the small percentage of additive? Doesn't make sense to me. Are you in the fuel business?
The short answer is they could, but they are NOT allowed to.These pipelines carry diesel, home heating oil, jet fuel, gasoline and various other products. When fuel containing a lubricity agent is pumped through a pipeline the lubricity agent coats the pipeline and wants to stay in place, however when the next product is pumped through the line, inevitably some of this agent comes off and is carried off in the new product. The Lubricity agents are considered contaminants in Jet fuels, and due to concerns over potential liability, nearly all of the pipeline carriers have banned these agents from their pipelines."
Help me understand something........ they wont add lubrication to the diesel because of fear of contamination in jet fuel. What percentage of additive is in the diesel. Dont you think the actual diesel or gas or whatever would contaminate the jet fuel more than the small percentage of additive? Doesn't make sense to me. Are you in the fuel business?
Cheers
Mike
###
#54
bio is very viable... not as the sole diesel energy source, but part of the whole package
#55
Thanks Mopar1973man and Pet05.
Your site convinced me that PS is is not what I thought it was if it's HFRR rating is 520, the same as ULSD. I'm going to start adding 2 stroke tonight.
Oddly enough, I just had my LP replaced after a tankful of the cheapest diesel in town which made the truck run so rough I doubled up on PS.
Will any 2 stroke work and is there an increase in tailpipe smoke?
thanks again for the technical info!
thanks pet05 for starting the thread!
Oddly enough, I just had my LP replaced after a tankful of the cheapest diesel in town which made the truck run so rough I doubled up on PS.
Will any 2 stroke work and is there an increase in tailpipe smoke?
thanks again for the technical info!
thanks pet05 for starting the thread!
#56
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Suprise, AZ
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your site convinced me that PS is is not what I thought it was if it's HFRR rating is 520, the same as ULSD. I'm going to start adding 2 stroke tonight.
Still not comfortable with adding 2 stroke to a $45k truck.
#58
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. George, UT
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First, pet05, I think I understand you're trying to point out there are some POTENTIAL problems for those of us whose diesels were not originally designed to burn ULSD. So, thanks for educating us with solid facts. It's also good to provide a historical perspective such as the comparison with leaded vs. unleaded fuels and the change from unlimited sulfur diesels to LSD. In both instances, to one degree or another, engine longevity and reliability were affected and the cause could be directly linked back to the change in fuel formulations.
To the criticizers, is his point to blow this out of proportion or to educate? I guess you have to make that call. I thought his initial posts were well-researched and written and increased my level of awareness of what I'm putting into my tank. Am I panicked now that I've read them? Certainly not. I regularly add Amsoil Diesel Concentrate which is specifically labelled to compensate for the reduced lubricity of ULSD when used at the recommended rate. It's only anecdotal so it's no good statistically but I've got a friend who recently had to replace his pump in his 1st gen diesel after nearly 280,000 miles of service only after being forced to switch from LSD #2 to ULSD. Yeah, it's high mileage so it could have been that pump's time but, then again, it only failed after the distributors in the area had switched to ULSD. So, maybe it wasn't the fuel but it definitely COULD have been the fuel. I don't know.
So, to everybody else, I agree with the criticizers insofar as they're preaching: "add lubricant 'X' to your engine and don't stress too much." There really isn't much more we can do unless and until either OEMs or aftermarket suppliers start making replacement seals, hoses, fittings, pump internals, etc. which will provide greater longevity with a reduced-lubricity fuel, just like what happened with the leaded/unleaded changeover.
To the biodieselers, you guys're awesome. I fully support the use of environmentally-friendly non-fossil fuels which also happen to be a renewable resource and benefit everyone from the farmer producing the crops to the kids in the playground that breathe the exhaust of passing motorists. Unfortunately, a lot of areas of the country (like my frickin' area) don't have commercially available bio-diesel. I am considering starting a bio-diesel business here in which I process WVO to meet EPA bio-diesel standards and sell it to local distributors for blending with their petro-diesel. Any ideas you bio-dieselers could give me would be helpful in knowing what I'd need to do but not in this post. Maybe I'll start a new thread in the bio-diesel section.
To the one nut who thinks we should ration fuel and only "true workers," should own trucks--does this sound like Marxism to anyone else? Come on, the nature of capitalism is to allow consumers and producers to freely choose that which we wish to produce and to consume. If I choose to own a diesel it's because I recognize the inherent greater fuel efficiency of the diesel engine and there're very few diesel engine options in the US car market right now. I occasionally use my truck for home improvement type projects, toy hauling, and "work truck," type activities. I used to own a half-ton, fuel injected, overdrive Chevy with a 350 that's 'lighter and smaller' than a 3/4 ton Dodge and, on paper, should be less of a fuel consumer but we all know they're not. I consistently netted 10 mpg around town and 13 on the highway at 65-70 mph. My cummins consistently nets me 15-15 around town and 17-18 on the freeway at 70-75 mph. You do the math. Don't preach to me about how I should "downsize," to a lesser gas engine 'cause I don't "need," the power and torque of the Cummins. I am a capitalist and I buy what I want not what the government thinks I need.
Ok, I'm off my soapbox.
To the criticizers, is his point to blow this out of proportion or to educate? I guess you have to make that call. I thought his initial posts were well-researched and written and increased my level of awareness of what I'm putting into my tank. Am I panicked now that I've read them? Certainly not. I regularly add Amsoil Diesel Concentrate which is specifically labelled to compensate for the reduced lubricity of ULSD when used at the recommended rate. It's only anecdotal so it's no good statistically but I've got a friend who recently had to replace his pump in his 1st gen diesel after nearly 280,000 miles of service only after being forced to switch from LSD #2 to ULSD. Yeah, it's high mileage so it could have been that pump's time but, then again, it only failed after the distributors in the area had switched to ULSD. So, maybe it wasn't the fuel but it definitely COULD have been the fuel. I don't know.
So, to everybody else, I agree with the criticizers insofar as they're preaching: "add lubricant 'X' to your engine and don't stress too much." There really isn't much more we can do unless and until either OEMs or aftermarket suppliers start making replacement seals, hoses, fittings, pump internals, etc. which will provide greater longevity with a reduced-lubricity fuel, just like what happened with the leaded/unleaded changeover.
To the biodieselers, you guys're awesome. I fully support the use of environmentally-friendly non-fossil fuels which also happen to be a renewable resource and benefit everyone from the farmer producing the crops to the kids in the playground that breathe the exhaust of passing motorists. Unfortunately, a lot of areas of the country (like my frickin' area) don't have commercially available bio-diesel. I am considering starting a bio-diesel business here in which I process WVO to meet EPA bio-diesel standards and sell it to local distributors for blending with their petro-diesel. Any ideas you bio-dieselers could give me would be helpful in knowing what I'd need to do but not in this post. Maybe I'll start a new thread in the bio-diesel section.
To the one nut who thinks we should ration fuel and only "true workers," should own trucks--does this sound like Marxism to anyone else? Come on, the nature of capitalism is to allow consumers and producers to freely choose that which we wish to produce and to consume. If I choose to own a diesel it's because I recognize the inherent greater fuel efficiency of the diesel engine and there're very few diesel engine options in the US car market right now. I occasionally use my truck for home improvement type projects, toy hauling, and "work truck," type activities. I used to own a half-ton, fuel injected, overdrive Chevy with a 350 that's 'lighter and smaller' than a 3/4 ton Dodge and, on paper, should be less of a fuel consumer but we all know they're not. I consistently netted 10 mpg around town and 13 on the highway at 65-70 mph. My cummins consistently nets me 15-15 around town and 17-18 on the freeway at 70-75 mph. You do the math. Don't preach to me about how I should "downsize," to a lesser gas engine 'cause I don't "need," the power and torque of the Cummins. I am a capitalist and I buy what I want not what the government thinks I need.
Ok, I'm off my soapbox.
#59
Just greased the pig!
Just poured a boatload of Valvoline 2 stroke in..man she is purring like a kitten!
...and I'm stickin it to the EPA.
Here in Los Angeles we don't trust air we can't see.
...and I'm stickin it to the EPA.
Here in Los Angeles we don't trust air we can't see.
#60
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Always get a receipt when you purchase fuel....
There were problems with the elimination of MBTE and the change over to ethanol/gasoline blend. Similar circumstances to the diesel fuel with adding the ethanol to the gasoline at the distribution point. A co-worker of mine got a tankful of unleaded surprise right after the changeover. The distributor didn't get the blend quite right. It destroyed the fuel system on his car. He was able to recover the cost of the repairs from the fuel distributor due to a receipt proving where he purchased his fuel.
There were problems with the elimination of MBTE and the change over to ethanol/gasoline blend. Similar circumstances to the diesel fuel with adding the ethanol to the gasoline at the distribution point. A co-worker of mine got a tankful of unleaded surprise right after the changeover. The distributor didn't get the blend quite right. It destroyed the fuel system on his car. He was able to recover the cost of the repairs from the fuel distributor due to a receipt proving where he purchased his fuel.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post