Worse Fuel Mileage with Smaller Tires
#1
Chapter President
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Worse Fuel Mileage with Smaller Tires
Hey all,
Question... How come I'm getting an average of 13.5mpg with my new Procomp Extreme All Terrains and with the 315 BFGs I was averaging 14.9mpg.
I've had the speedo recalibrated. Measured myself the revs per mile at 643. One problem I'm having is my tire guy can't get them balanced. Would that cause a loss of economy. I thought going back down to a size closer to stock would yield improved economy. All driving habits are the same. BTW with my stock michelins I was averaging 16.5mpg before going to the 315BFGs
thanks for any input,
Jamie
Question... How come I'm getting an average of 13.5mpg with my new Procomp Extreme All Terrains and with the 315 BFGs I was averaging 14.9mpg.
I've had the speedo recalibrated. Measured myself the revs per mile at 643. One problem I'm having is my tire guy can't get them balanced. Would that cause a loss of economy. I thought going back down to a size closer to stock would yield improved economy. All driving habits are the same. BTW with my stock michelins I was averaging 16.5mpg before going to the 315BFGs
thanks for any input,
Jamie
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know but it might have something to do with rolling resistance and tire design. I just replaced the factory BFG rugged trails with bridgestone dueler revos and the are the same size and e rated and I have lost atleast 1mpg or something else is up and it is just coincidence. the ride is great and the traction is awesome, but man I didn't want to lose any mpg's.
just my .02
just my .02
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Malad/ Pocatello Idaho
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mpg with smaller tire
Originally Posted by RonP
it might have something to do with rolling resistance and tire design.
well tire design will be a diffrence in a big way!! and you are now turning more RPM's at the same speed with a smaller tire. with the 315's your RPM's were lower, meaning less foot on the peddle as well.
i went from a 35-12.50-16 BFG M/T to a 315-75-16 Toyo and picked up almost 3 mpg on the highway. i also went to a less agressive tire, more suted for the road.
hope this helps some, Bob
#5
Registered User
What everyone else said.
Also, don't assume that they filled the tires to adequate pressure. A lot of these guys think 30-32psi is always the standard - on most of these newer light truck tires it's much much higher. This would kill your mileage. Look at the sidewall and make sure you have them filled to max specs.
Also, don't assume that they filled the tires to adequate pressure. A lot of these guys think 30-32psi is always the standard - on most of these newer light truck tires it's much much higher. This would kill your mileage. Look at the sidewall and make sure you have them filled to max specs.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by omaharam
Look at the sidewall and make sure you have them filled to max specs.
There is PROPER tire pressure and there is ALLOWABLE tire pressure.
The "max" on the sidewall is NOT the ideal pressure for tire wear.
Yes, you will get best MPG at this pressure (rock hard tires-- low rolling resistance), but your tread will prematurely wear out by unevenly wearing out the middle first.
If you don't care about tire wear and brutal ride, then by all means, fill them up until they explode.
#7
Chapter President
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HOHN
NO NO NO NO NO!!!
There is PROPER tire pressure and there is ALLOWABLE tire pressure.
The "max" on the sidewall is NOT the ideal pressure for tire wear.
Yes, you will get best MPG at this pressure (rock hard tires-- low rolling resistance), but your tread will prematurely wear out by unevenly wearing out the middle first.
If you don't care about tire wear and brutal ride, then by all means, fill them up until they explode.
There is PROPER tire pressure and there is ALLOWABLE tire pressure.
The "max" on the sidewall is NOT the ideal pressure for tire wear.
Yes, you will get best MPG at this pressure (rock hard tires-- low rolling resistance), but your tread will prematurely wear out by unevenly wearing out the middle first.
If you don't care about tire wear and brutal ride, then by all means, fill them up until they explode.
Jamie
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You area also running at slightly higher RPMs for the same speed now. So take this into consideration. When I went from the stock 245s up to 315s (a BIG difference) my milage stayed about the same. A lot more rolling resistance, BUT my RPMs are down a good 13%. I have 4.10s so I was up there in the RPM range with the stock tiny tires.
#10
Registered User
Originally Posted by HOHN
NO NO NO NO NO!!!
There is PROPER tire pressure and there is ALLOWABLE tire pressure.
The "max" on the sidewall is NOT the ideal pressure for tire wear.
Yes, you will get best MPG at this pressure (rock hard tires-- low rolling resistance), but your tread will prematurely wear out by unevenly wearing out the middle first.
If you don't care about tire wear and brutal ride, then by all means, fill them up until they explode.
There is PROPER tire pressure and there is ALLOWABLE tire pressure.
The "max" on the sidewall is NOT the ideal pressure for tire wear.
Yes, you will get best MPG at this pressure (rock hard tires-- low rolling resistance), but your tread will prematurely wear out by unevenly wearing out the middle first.
If you don't care about tire wear and brutal ride, then by all means, fill them up until they explode.
#11
Registered User
I think your revs per mile may be a little high but a more aggressive tire will always have a higher rolling resistence. My speedo is dead on with the pinion factor set at 634 with 285 BFG AT KOs.
#13
Registered User
Originally Posted by omaharam
I've had 3lbs less than max in mine for 30,000+ miles and they are wearing perfectly even. I understand that an overinflated tire can cause excessive wear in the middle, but these trucks are heavy enough to run the pressure and still get good wear. Yes, it rides worse, but at going on $3 a gallon again, I'll bounce around a bit. Also, the narrower the tire, the less it matters. So a 315 will be more prone to center wear slightly overinflated than a 275, and so on.
Cheers
Mike
###
In over 250,000 miles running my tires at 75 PSI(80 PSI cold recommnded on the sidewalls) 6 sets of tires, i've had 2 flat tires and zero other problems. And even wear. Just luck? Not IMHO!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lurch519
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
4
06-24-2012 04:20 AM
sakisaki400
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
23
12-31-2006 10:17 PM
Pa outlaw
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
5
12-12-2002 12:00 AM