3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

My Results with TST on the rollers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2005 | 11:40 PM
  #1  
danshsss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: San Juan Bautista
My Results with TST on the rollers

On 7x7 I made 415hp and 735tq
On 8x8 I made 372hp and 606tq
On 9x9 I made 360hp and 617tq

I have stock air box I just took the filter out,,, And I have straight exhaust no cat our muff..
No other mods,truck has 88k miles
Old 01-17-2005 | 11:47 PM
  #2  
StrokeThisCTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: South Fork, Colorado
wow so the higher levels lose quite a bit of torque. Nice dyno numbers. i guess you put about 500/820 to the crank now
Old 01-17-2005 | 11:56 PM
  #3  
danshsss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: San Juan Bautista
Mark Soiland (dodge) HP 286.8 TQ 509.6
Jake Gershen (chevy) HP 214.5 TQ 375.0
Brad Ponci (dodge) HP 460.8 TQ 694.9 W/M HP 586.1 / TQ 973
Chris Robinson (ford) HP 152 TQ 254.5
Don Vizgaudis (dodge) HP 257.3 TQ 595.3
Jeremy Torgersen (dodge) HP 413.2 TQ 805.9 W/M HP 486.9 / TQ 881.8
Dennis Vizgaudis (dodge) HP 203.5 TQ 446.4
Ron Allen (dodge) HP 428.4 TQ 793.0
Gary Jones (ford) HP 330.0 TQ 676.0
David Tygert (dodge) HP 249.0 TQ 455.3
Will Soria (ford) HP 252.3 TQ 455.3
Robert Saderlund (dodge) HP 269.1 TQ 541.4
Randy Welch (ford/cummins) HP 163.0 TQ 395.7
Kirk Cunningham (ford) HP 298.4 TQ 665.2
Treavor Coats (dodge) HP 430.2 TQ 824.3 W/M HP 505.9 / TQ 931.8
Mike Colosky (dodge) HP 233.0 TQ 497.6
Pete Iacopi (dodge) HP 483.1 TQ 809.0
Brad Seitz (dodge) HP 477.9 TQ 874.9
Dave Burns (dodge) HP 340.6 TQ 684.8
Forrest Wolf (dodge) HP 436.2 TQ 890.0
Cliff Scott (dodge) HP 371.6 TQ 754.2
Galen Porter (dodge) HP 416.7 TQ 850.6
Dan Black (dodge) HP 415.9 TQ 735.9
Dave Murakami (ford) HP 374.3 TQ 672.3
Max Gaub (dodge) HP 349.9 TQ 651.2
Frank Steele (dodge) HP 246.1 TQ 565.6
Ryan Connolly (ford) HP 169.8 TQ 314.8
Don Doan (ford) HP 335 TQ 615
John Hamlin (chevy) HP 385.7 TQ 678.5
Matt Malinowski (dodge) 327.5 TQ 589.8
Sebastian Carter (dodge) 385.6 TQ 765.7
Old 01-18-2005 | 12:08 AM
  #4  
Tom488's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Yep - pretty consistent with what others have posted (myself included). Over-fueling the engine just makes smoke and lots of heat, but no real power. Now you know where to run your box for optimum power, and you can also see the potential that's there if you increase the amount of air you're feeding it.
Old 01-18-2005 | 01:07 AM
  #5  
Kyle Graham's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Re: My Results with TST on the rollers

Originally posted by danshsss
On 7x7 I made 415hp and 735tq
On 8x8 I made 372hp and 606tq
On 9x9 I made 360hp and 617tq

I have stock air box I just took the filter out,,, And I have straight exhaust no cat our muff..
No other mods,truck has 88k miles
You definitely need a new charger look into the super b have had alot of success with it teamed up with tst box spools very quick as well unlike most big chargers
Old 01-18-2005 | 04:35 AM
  #6  
danshsss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: San Juan Bautista
I should be getting twins some time this year.
Old 01-18-2005 | 09:30 AM
  #7  
AK RAM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: Moved.......now Sumter, SC
Good numbers! It would be very interesting to see if you (or anyone else for that matter) gained power on the top two levels with more air available.

Brian
Old 01-18-2005 | 11:08 AM
  #8  
Gwoody's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Mo.
I've heard the stock lift pump won't keep up at the higher levels, mine was dynoed before the air dog was installed, I would like to see what it is now.
Old 01-18-2005 | 12:12 PM
  #9  
Don M's Avatar
DTR Advertiser
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 1
From: In the Shop
Yeah, good numbers. The correction factor was actually 7 percent negative that day.

415 x 7% is actually 445 HP Negative correction factors on heavily fueled engines is bogus and corrects down way too much.

Your closer to 450. Perhaps more on a good 70 degree day.

Don~
Old 01-18-2005 | 12:58 PM
  #10  
digger5.9ho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Did you try 5x5? I have seen some good number around that level.
Old 01-18-2005 | 04:12 PM
  #11  
502502's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Re: My Results with TST on the rollers

Originally posted by danshsss
On 7x7 I made 415hp and 735tq
On 8x8 I made 372hp and 606tq
On 9x9 I made 360hp and 617tq

I have stock air box I just took the filter out,,, And I have straight exhaust no cat our muff..
No other mods,truck has 88k miles
What edition box do you have? Is it the latest flash, or the older one?

And also keep in mind that when mark at TST dyno his own rig, the only way to get the fuel was a pusher pump, without it. lost power i think
Old 01-18-2005 | 06:44 PM
  #12  
cquestad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,540
Likes: 0
From: Boise, Idaho
You may not notice the fuel shortage on the dyno...but on the track you definately will...

A dyno run takes only a short burst...and sometimes the OEM lift pump can keep up. Extented accelleration through all the gears or pulling something really hard will run the OEM lift pump dry.

Scotty's kit is really flexable and will work with your pump of choice. I have had great luck with a Holley Blue and his kit.
Old 01-18-2005 | 08:55 PM
  #13  
Tom488's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
TST has (or had - I noticed it was up for sale) a Mustang dyno, which is how they got the peak torque readings on their runs. A dynojet doesn't run long enough to drain the fuel, nor can it provide the load to allow the turbo to spool up before the engine leaves it's peak torque range. This is why most of the runs posted here, although upwards of 450-500HP, don't break into the 1000+ft.lb. range that Mark was able to achieve with just his box on his load dyno.
Old 01-18-2005 | 09:10 PM
  #14  
danshsss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: San Juan Bautista
Re: Re: My Results with TST on the rollers

Originally posted by Tomeygun
What edition box do you have? Is it the latest flash, or the older one?

And also keep in mind that when mark at TST dyno his own rig, the only way to get the fuel was a pusher pump, without it. lost power i think


My box is only a few months old,so I assume its the milder version,,,,I bought it new from TST.
Old 01-23-2005 | 07:55 AM
  #15  
Twisted Shifter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: FL
Danshess, If you are not running any type of pusher pump for the fuel and you are running the box that hard??? Do you have gauges installed. Hell if I put my TST on 3-2 w/o the FASS system installed I was down to 2 psi the pump needs 3.

So I think a few of you really need to go back and do a little homeworkk!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.