MPI Twins Are In!!! (Pics Inside)
#62
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For controlling max boost, yes.
For controlling drive pressures, no.
WG'ing the bottom charger (in the case of an S400) would require using an external WG. That's not cheap and adds a good amount to the price. I think the only time you would really need a WG on the bottom charger is if you're heavily fueled with huge HP.
For controlling drive pressures, no.
WG'ing the bottom charger (in the case of an S400) would require using an external WG. That's not cheap and adds a good amount to the price. I think the only time you would really need a WG on the bottom charger is if you're heavily fueled with huge HP.
#64
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what should the top charger wastegate be set up? A htt 62 is whats gonna be on top. Also Say if I wanted to run more then 40psi or limit how much boost I want to run max then what should I do that make that work?
#65
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 5,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It actually works better IMHO if you do it MPI's way...and the wastegate is actually controlled by a spring resisting drive pressure. Boost is what would be measured in the cold pipe between the the two turbos...
by 40 psi (total boost) you should see near 50/50 split. 40 total...20 in the cold pipe. That menas each turbo is making 20 psi boost. Mine match by 40 and climb almost identical till 80. THAT...is a perfect design.
by 40 psi (total boost) you should see near 50/50 split. 40 total...20 in the cold pipe. That menas each turbo is making 20 psi boost. Mine match by 40 and climb almost identical till 80. THAT...is a perfect design.
#66
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western Ky.
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what is done with the stocker and the wastegate. It is electronically controlled right? What keeps it from overspeeding with the s-400 pushing it? Does MPI provide some kind of an electronic unit to prevent the top turbo from working too hard?
#67
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't have to worry about overspeeding the top turbo because it's actually working much less than it would be if used as a single. You don't have to worry about overspeeding the S400 because it's such a big turbo with a huge exhaust housing.
Like Christian said, each turbo should be putting out 50% of the total boost. 50psi of boost on a properly tuned setup would mean each turbo is putting out around 25psi.
#68
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok so what is the correct safe way to go about this? Using a HTT 62/71 on top. Depending on how much total boost I want to run depends on what I set the top turbo waste gate to? For the s400 do I need to put one or two blow off valves in the intercooler pipe? Do both of them work for just the s400? Also how does the blow off valves work, by spring tension?
#69
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok so what is the correct safe way to go about this? Using a HTT 62/71 on top. Depending on how much total boost I want to run depends on what I set the top turbo waste gate to? For the s400 do I need to put one or two blow off valves in the intercooler pipe? Do both of them work for just the s400? Also how does the blow off valves work, by spring tension?
Total boost is not controlled by the top turbo's WG. Total boost will be controlled by either your max fueling or whatever you have the pop-off valves set at. The top turbo's WG is only adjusted for tuning purposes (to hit that 50/50 ratio which is the sweet spot).
I would say you need 2 or more pop-off valves. They would be relieving boost pressure from both turbos since they're in the pipe leading to the IC.
#70
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, they work by spring tension.
Total boost is not controlled by the top turbo's WG. Total boost will be controlled by either your max fueling or whatever you have the pop-off valves set at. The top turbo's WG is only adjusted for tuning purposes (to hit that 50/50 ratio which is the sweet spot).
I would say you need 2 or more pop-off valves. They would be relieving boost pressure from both turbos since they're in the pipe leading to the IC.
Total boost is not controlled by the top turbo's WG. Total boost will be controlled by either your max fueling or whatever you have the pop-off valves set at. The top turbo's WG is only adjusted for tuning purposes (to hit that 50/50 ratio which is the sweet spot).
I would say you need 2 or more pop-off valves. They would be relieving boost pressure from both turbos since they're in the pipe leading to the IC.
#71
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To tune for that 50/50 ratio you connect a 2nd boost gauge to the port in the cold piping (between the two turbos). When that 2nd gauge reads 50% of what the total boost is then you're all set. This is adjusted using the WG on the top turbo.
#73
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only time max boost would be a concern is if you don't have head studs or you are way over-fueled with a smaller set of twins.
#74
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok gotcha.. So pretty much you just need to play with it alot and start off with the blow off valves..
#75
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts