Beta 4.4 Dyno results
07-13-2007, 06:37 PM
#17
Registered User
I need the guys that asked for this beta for towing and fuel economy to not use this program and please go back to a published software on the MADS site
http://www.madselectronics.com/download.html
The is a beta software and now that we know the results the stock guys that asked for this software need to take it easy.
Curtis went from 197 hp stock to 369 hp on software 1 on this 2003 yesterday.
I want to thank TB for his dyno testing today.
http://www.madselectronics.com/download.html
The is a beta software and now that we know the results the stock guys that asked for this software need to take it easy.
Curtis went from 197 hp stock to 369 hp on software 1 on this 2003 yesterday.
I want to thank TB for his dyno testing today.
07-13-2007, 07:21 PM
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin,Tx
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sorry, just got back so I'll try to catch up-------
It was a dynojet
all stock except for exhaust and homemade intake with amsoil air filter
lowest egt's were at 1156 on #3
highest were 1280 on #9
boost hit 40 on every run
like bob said, you guys running stock be careful.
It was a dynojet
all stock except for exhaust and homemade intake with amsoil air filter
lowest egt's were at 1156 on #3
highest were 1280 on #9
boost hit 40 on every run
like bob said, you guys running stock be careful.
07-14-2007, 02:36 AM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is fabulous! I love it! I have always been quite conservative with my driving style with these programs, but now I know for sure. My truck is set up a lot like yours so I can't be far from your numbers. Here comes a tranny and a turbo!!! 
07-14-2007, 08:58 AM
#22
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Twin Falls, Idaho
Posts: 5,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I need the guys that asked for this beta for towing and fuel economy to not use this program and please go back to a published software on the MADS site
http://www.madselectronics.com/download.html
The is a beta software and now that we know the results the stock guys that asked for this software need to take it easy.
Curtis went from 197 hp stock to 369 hp on software 1 on this 2003 yesterday.
I want to thank TB for his dyno testing today.
http://www.madselectronics.com/download.html
The is a beta software and now that we know the results the stock guys that asked for this software need to take it easy.
Curtis went from 197 hp stock to 369 hp on software 1 on this 2003 yesterday.
I want to thank TB for his dyno testing today.
OoOOOH come on BOB your ruining all the fun!!! I haven't had any troubles yet....
07-14-2007, 08:59 AM
#23
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Twin Falls, Idaho
Posts: 5,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Torque Beast!!! Awesome numbers!!!! That is just crazy with a smarty!!! Congrats to Bob and Marco!!!!
I can't wait to hit the rollers next month!!! I think I will try #5 and #7 and #9 to see any difference...
I can't wait to hit the rollers next month!!! I think I will try #5 and #7 and #9 to see any difference...
07-14-2007, 09:00 AM
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-14-2007, 09:10 AM
#25
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
those were some nice numbers. I'm very surprised to see them so high though.
I dynoed my truck on the Dunbar machine. Running the smarty on beta 4.3 # 7
and the TST on 2/0.
The best I could get was 441hp and 885TQ The stock tranny couldn't handle any more than that. The TQ slipped at top RPM ever time.
It's hard to believe the only running the smarty those numbers were had. Maybe because we have different trucks, I don't know....
here's my dyno sheet...
the red line is stacked and the blue is the smarty alone....
I dynoed my truck on the Dunbar machine. Running the smarty on beta 4.3 # 7
and the TST on 2/0.
The best I could get was 441hp and 885TQ The stock tranny couldn't handle any more than that. The TQ slipped at top RPM ever time.
It's hard to believe the only running the smarty those numbers were had. Maybe because we have different trucks, I don't know....
here's my dyno sheet...
the red line is stacked and the blue is the smarty alone....
07-14-2007, 09:35 AM
#26
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
pardon my ignorance, but why is this such a big deal?
Robert aka TexasCTD has been dynoing time after time right at 466-467hp for months on a stock truck with a Smarty on #9.
Robert aka TexasCTD has been dynoing time after time right at 466-467hp for months on a stock truck with a Smarty on #9.
07-14-2007, 09:36 AM
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maritimes, Canada
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The difference between 1 and 9 on Beta 4.4 doesn't seem to be so much the fueling as where it is applied.....9 has a much broader torque and hp curve I bet... Amazing numbers for a downloader. With a built tranny and lots of cool wet air going in.....It is a blast. If you are bone stock and stock tranny...Keep you foot out of it as that max tq/hp is beyond the capacity of the stock auto and clutch...plus the aggressiveness of the torque rise is well beyond what stock was meant to handle. If you can get your turbo to 40psi...it seems to stay relatively cool. ks
07-14-2007, 10:03 AM
#28
Registered User
07-14-2007, 10:13 AM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonds WA
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For those who havent run on #1 at all, you should try it and give Bob/Marco your feedback. I ran it for towing and just about killed my tranny. Thats when I first realized it was WAAAAYYYYYYY more than a 30hp bump.
On edit; When did Bob post that? I'll have to search it out. Shoot, I just had the Boeing Police out following me around after testing #5 on the Perimeter road! Tires are going to expensive!
07-14-2007, 10:14 AM
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like 4.4 just the way it is. I have no problems at all. Running s/w #7 egts stay under 1400*, turbo spools great "50 psi", little to no smoke for normal driving and rail pressure doesn't go over 24.5K. Truck has never run better and has all the power I want "12.40s".