AMSOIL EaA Air Filters
#1
AMSOIL EaA Air Filters
I know these filters are new to the market but was wondering if anyone has any experience with them. Seems like a pretty good alternative to the oil filters like my AFE. It looks like you can clean them with a shop vac or air hose and they are good for 100k miles.
http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/eaa.aspx
http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/eaa.aspx
#2
These are filters based on a nanoweb technology made by Donaldson.
They are the best money can buy for efficiency (dust removal). I don't know how they are at airflow, though though WILL be better than a comparable cellulose (paper) filter.
They will make air surgically clean. Want to talk about low silicon level in oil analysis? I'd bet these go <4-5ppm regularly.
jmo
They are the best money can buy for efficiency (dust removal). I don't know how they are at airflow, though though WILL be better than a comparable cellulose (paper) filter.
They will make air surgically clean. Want to talk about low silicon level in oil analysis? I'd bet these go <4-5ppm regularly.
jmo
#3
If I am reading the information correctly they say they filter the air as well as a stock paper filter but flow as good as an oiled filter like a AFE or K&N. Sounds like the best of both worlds and much easier to clean.
#4
I had just posted this in the SP BHAF thread, and your link is broken.
Here is the corrected link. This is the tantalizing parts from the description (with graphs):
and then ....
If these are claims are true, what's not to love?
Here is the corrected link. This is the tantalizing parts from the description (with graphs):
Above: AMSOIL Ea Air Filters have more than three times the airflow of cellulose. Both wet gauze and Ea are below 0.5 inches of initial restriction.
Above: AMSOIL Ea Air Filter media removes 5 times more dust than traditional cellulose filters and 50 times more dust than wet gauze.
#5
You are correct, it does not work. Well maybe we will get some answers on your post. Just seemed like a pretty good deal if it does what they say it does. It is probably to new for anyone to have one installed yet.
#6
Just for giggles I called Amsoil's technical line to see if they hard a cross reference part in the Eaa line for the Donaldson BHAF we've been discussing. And no. The largest filter he could find had a 3" outlet, and the CFM rating? He had no clue.
Why is it so hard for manufacturers to provide detailes up to date technical information on a product. I mean they spend all the money to make the dang things and then it seems it can take years to find out all the relevant information.
Why is it so hard for manufacturers to provide detailes up to date technical information on a product. I mean they spend all the money to make the dang things and then it seems it can take years to find out all the relevant information.
#7
Originally Posted by Hunter11
You are correct, it does not work. Well maybe we will get some answers on your post. Just seemed like a pretty good deal if it does what they say it does. It is probably to new for anyone to have one installed yet.
I will let you all know what I think after a couple of miles on it in the desert this winter.
Trending Topics
#8
I called Amsoil tech support again today 'cause you know how support is, sometimes you get someone who has a clue and other days ....
Anyway, the largest filter in the EAA line appears to be for our trucks so no BHAFs as I found out before. I did manage to get a flow rate data point (I think this was for the 2002 5.9 ISB engine filter, the 2003 and up was a different part number, should be similar I'm assuming):
200 CFM @ 0.82 H2O" restriction. So if we normalize this to the stock filter rating at 4.66" H2O restriction we get:
Flow = sqr(4.66) / sqr(0.82) * 200 CFM = 476 CFM. Stock filter was 452 CFM, so color me unimpressed and finding their claim that it flows as well as a gauze filter seemingly unfactual.
Oh and they would not provide me with the ISO test results.
Anyway, the largest filter in the EAA line appears to be for our trucks so no BHAFs as I found out before. I did manage to get a flow rate data point (I think this was for the 2002 5.9 ISB engine filter, the 2003 and up was a different part number, should be similar I'm assuming):
200 CFM @ 0.82 H2O" restriction. So if we normalize this to the stock filter rating at 4.66" H2O restriction we get:
Flow = sqr(4.66) / sqr(0.82) * 200 CFM = 476 CFM. Stock filter was 452 CFM, so color me unimpressed and finding their claim that it flows as well as a gauze filter seemingly unfactual.
Oh and they would not provide me with the ISO test results.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
staarma
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
28
05-01-2008 12:10 PM
SmokinOilBurner
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
13
01-28-2008 06:16 AM
jethroish
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
7
03-04-2003 09:42 PM