3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

2007 5.9 Tuner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2014, 10:46 AM
  #31  
DTR 1st Sergeant
 
soulezoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Applegate, CA
Posts: 5,530
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
by the way, on your settings... the TQ should be at 1 or 2 at most for best mileage... not 4. Timing should be at 3 or 4 for best mileage, not 1 or 2.
Old 10-15-2014, 05:29 PM
  #32  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rock-Hard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sasser, GA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by soulezoo
by the way, on your settings... the TQ should be at 1 or 2 at most for best mileage... not 4. Timing should be at 3 or 4 for best mileage, not 1 or 2.
So what would be the best setting for best MPG? I do not understand the difference between these numbers and what the settings do to the truck.


Thanks for the replies. I am not sticking my foot in the throttle. I am trying to get the best MPG not the most power. I know the difference in driving styles.
Old 10-16-2014, 09:29 AM
  #33  
DTR 1st Sergeant
 
soulezoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Applegate, CA
Posts: 5,530
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Timing simply affects where the fuel is injected before top dead center. You can gain up to 40 hp through timing alone (other conditions affect just what that gain will be) that is extra HP with no extra fuel. Why? Because earlier timing raises cylinder pressure and therefore greater downforce energy produced. Why don't manufactures do this? Emissions. Earlier timing produces more soot and more nox.

So the rule of thumb is as much timing as you can stand the rattle will produce the best results.

TQ (torque management) in the simplest of terms is throttle "touchiness" and the amount of fuel provided off idle and the it also controls the amount of defuel between shifts in the transmission. TQ simply adds fuel... it certainly enhances the driving feel, but uses more fuel and is harder on the transmission. This has little to no practical effect on manual transmission engines. For best fuel economy, leave it in default or 1.
Old 11-11-2014, 10:00 AM
  #34  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rock-Hard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sasser, GA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems after having a overhead run and some performance tests(supposedly) run, I have some type of injector problem. I think the guy who checked my truck ripped me off because he said he did cylinder cut-outs but couldn't tell me anything that was wrong with any given cylinder. My truck does have a little more vibration than it should. The truck seems to run fine, just not getting good fuel mileage. Could one injector be a little out of spec causing poor performance?
Old 11-11-2014, 12:07 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
john40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orcutt, Ca.
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Rock-Hard
Hand checked at the setting in the previous post. 12.99 mpg. Freaking terrible with the Smarty. I returned the truck to stock, uninstalled the Smarty. Instantly saw the overhead go up about 4 mpg. Now that may not be accurate but I will check the mileage again asap. I wonder if something else is wrong that is killing my mileage with the Smarty. Could the Smarty be flawed?
My Smarty Jr is set the same as yours with the POD set at 90 (less smoke).
I get about 18 MPG solo and between 11 and 12 MPG towing a 12,000# 5th whl.
Good luck-John
Old 11-20-2014, 04:28 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Sawyer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Alberta,Canada
Posts: 158
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have an Edge Juice CS and it is set on power level 3 and if I do a real time check with the overhead it shows I get between 23-26MPG at 60mph with the cruise on. Around the city not so good with the stop and go but not bad on highway.
Old 11-27-2014, 03:35 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
silverbullet02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kingston, TN
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw no noticeable difference in mileage with the Smarty Jr. I have noticed when calculating mileage you gotta go thru a couple tanks. It's hard to fill up exactly the same each time, and the less miles on the tank the easier it is to have a wild swing in perceived mpg. Of course, my driving is so varied on the truck that it's hard to get a "normal" tank, but it's about the same as always. I will say that the Jr. made the overhead less wild. It was easy to make the overhead read 25 before, not so much now.
Old 12-05-2014, 09:12 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
suprajake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget any wind resistance. My stock truck varies 4-6 MPG based on headwind/tailwind. I'm looking to get a Smarty JR, if I can find a reasonable deal for a used one.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fronty Owner
Other
187
11-17-2007 12:44 PM
burners_banshee
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
3
09-10-2007 02:03 PM
ID2500Ram
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
8
04-29-2007 11:31 PM



Quick Reply: 2007 5.9 Tuner



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.