11.41 fuel only Videos and Time Slip (not claiming)
03-25-2007, 10:50 AM
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-25-2007, 11:45 AM
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congrats!
Common rail is the wave of the future.
Like I've said in the past, 2007 will be a very interesting year.
As far as the Dmaxes living in fear? Can't speak for the others, but we are only beginning to play with "#2 Only" setups. One experiment we ran, we clicked off 11.82 @ 120.4 at LACR on a 2.0 60' time spinning all four tires past the 330' beam. There is still rubber splattered everywhere in all four wheelwells.
This was done with stock injectors and "detuned"
54PSI out of a single charger, at 1625 degrees. High altitude tends to drop boost and raise EGT's.
Indiana will most likely have some very interesting stuff show up. I know I've tuned about a dozen trucks that should be faster than ours so far.
The real crazy thing about this, is that these wicked CR buildups (at least the Dmaxes) are very streetable and can still be used for towing.
Again Congrats!
Common rail is the wave of the future.
Like I've said in the past, 2007 will be a very interesting year.
As far as the Dmaxes living in fear? Can't speak for the others, but we are only beginning to play with "#2 Only" setups. One experiment we ran, we clicked off 11.82 @ 120.4 at LACR on a 2.0 60' time spinning all four tires past the 330' beam. There is still rubber splattered everywhere in all four wheelwells.
This was done with stock injectors and "detuned"
54PSI out of a single charger, at 1625 degrees. High altitude tends to drop boost and raise EGT's.Indiana will most likely have some very interesting stuff show up. I know I've tuned about a dozen trucks that should be faster than ours so far.
The real crazy thing about this, is that these wicked CR buildups (at least the Dmaxes) are very streetable and can still be used for towing.
Again Congrats!
03-25-2007, 01:27 PM
#50
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maritimes, Canada
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Possible although not probable if you have stock tires at pressure and a front locker....no locker on the front than BS....post the timeslip and video....With that slow of a 60' and only 120mph at the end where did ya make up the time. I personally can't wait to see this years results...it should be fun...Can't wait to see those 6.4's kicking our butts
. ks
. ks
03-25-2007, 03:42 PM
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: folsom,ca
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha, even if the truck is capable of spinning all 4 tires to the 330' mark...why would the driver stay in it that long?? why wouldn’t he lift and ease back on the throttle. Any one who has driven a vehicle knows you can move faster if your tires are NOT spinning/slipping (burning out)
03-25-2007, 04:07 PM
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
goon numbers guys, that is flat out flying for number two.... i gotta good felling you will see a few other common rail cummins going into the 10s this year north of the border.... the sport will be raised to a new level by the cummins
great to hear!!
great to hear!!
03-25-2007, 04:14 PM
#53
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bet with a set of ladder bars and a good launch James will be knocking on 10's door on fuel.
03-25-2007, 06:32 PM
#55
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha, even if the truck is capable of spinning all 4 tires to the 330' mark...why would the driver stay in it that long?? why wouldn’t he lift and ease back on the throttle. Any one who has driven a vehicle knows you can move faster if your tires are NOT spinning/slipping (burning out)
03-25-2007, 06:58 PM
#56
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On fuel? Last I knew every common rail dodge quicker than 12.0 was spraying. Running 11.5 on spray compared to 10s on fuel is a big jump. I'm curious to see if they will pull it off.
I bet with a set of ladder bars and a good launch James will be knocking on 10's door on fuel.
I bet with a set of ladder bars and a good launch James will be knocking on 10's door on fuel.
11.41 was just posted this weekend on fuel only, and quite a few trucks who just need some tuning to break the 11sec barrier.
the 11.41 was done on a single charger truck. i will not at all be suprised to see a common rail cummins go 10's on #2 this year, but it will prolly need twins to do it, i just dont see a single getting enough air in there.
03-25-2007, 07:42 PM
#59
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maryland
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On fuel? Last I knew every common rail dodge quicker than 12.0 was spraying. Running 11.5 on spray compared to 10s on fuel is a big jump. I'm curious to see if they will pull it off.
I bet with a set of ladder bars and a good launch James will be knocking on 10's door on fuel.
I bet with a set of ladder bars and a good launch James will be knocking on 10's door on fuel.