3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

New guy looking for 2003+ cummins.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2007 | 01:29 PM
  #16  
jrsmokestacks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
The 48re is an incredible trans imo. Had one in my 05', in a year and a half, I put 65,000 miles on it. Went throught 2 sets of 35's and the stockers(alot of towing, burnouts, plowing, tuggin.) I put that trans through hell and it never let me down. Did back to back tugs in 4lo on pavement w/ hot juice on 5. Many times i'd plow 12-15 hours straight with trans @250* the whole time. It was a stock trans too, just changed the fluid once(cause it looked like engine oil) I got rid of the truck because i prefer stick, and I needed a 4door dually. Any year common rail truck is a good truck from my experience, have a 305, had a 325, and have a 350.







Old 09-26-2007 | 02:08 PM
  #17  
SSminnow's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 1
From: Pearland, TX
Originally Posted by 2003Ram
Ever owned one?

Why don't you read, what the first or second line below that says
Old 09-26-2007 | 02:46 PM
  #18  
2003Ram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by SSminnow
Why don't you read, what the first or second line below that says
It does not say anything about you ever owning a truck with a 48RE tranny.

My point is, you statement about the big three automatic transmissions was subjective, and not based on any facts or even your own personal experience.

I have one, and so far it's holding up nicely. In fact, there are very few complaints on this board or elsewhere having to do with the 48RE's longevity or reliability, and I'm sure you know if someone was going to complain, you would see it here.
Old 09-26-2007 | 03:14 PM
  #19  
SSminnow's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 1
From: Pearland, TX
Originally Posted by 2003Ram
It does not say anything about you ever owning a truck with a 48RE tranny.

My point is, you statement about the big three automatic transmissions was subjective, and not based on any facts or even your own personal experience.

I have one, and so far it's holding up nicely. In fact, there are very few complaints on this board or elsewhere having to do with the 48RE's longevity or reliability, and I'm sure you know if someone was going to complain, you would see it here.
I will say again, I have owned all 3 trucks. I am glad your tranny has held up, great for you. Still does not change my opinion on it (and a few others I might add) that it is the weakest of teh bunch. And your statement is just that, an opinion, as you have NO clue what my personal experience is with anything, much less with my truck or any truck that I have owned for that matter. So, you keep throwing your opinions out there, and I will keep throwing mine. I never said take my word as Gospel. This is a public forum (didn't we have this discussion already) and I am free to voice my opinion, as I have chosen to do so. DId my opinion hurt your feelings that much about the tranny that you felt the need to start a war with me? Or is it, that you are trying to pull me into another debate to get attention of other's? So, in case you missed my opinion, the 48re is the weakest of teh 3.
Old 09-26-2007 | 03:39 PM
  #20  
rip 112's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,813
Likes: 2
From: LaGrange, Texas
Lets not rock the boat fellas...
Old 09-26-2007 | 04:03 PM
  #21  
2003Ram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Agreed. Opinion and conjecture.
Old 09-26-2007 | 04:44 PM
  #22  
up_roktoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Good information so far guys.

Whichever truck I buy should not see too much abuse, fully loaded on the trailer the boat weighs less then 4,000 pounds, it just so happens that my 99 z71 has 170,000 miles on it and although it tows the boat just fine, the tranny downshifts at every hint of a hill. I would think with the diesel I could set the cruise and have enough power to not worry about it.

i do tow the boat about 400 miles per week, another reason I thinka diesel would be a good option.

Never really liked the duramx trucks, they are too car like for me, hence the ford/dodge argument.

my buddy loves his 6.0 and tows a similar sized boat (slightly bigger) but online seems the 6.0's are hated.....

maybe I will flip a coin? The dodge certainly wins on looks.
Old 09-26-2007 | 06:29 PM
  #23  
2003Ram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by up_roktoy
Good information so far guys.

Whichever truck I buy should not see too much abuse, fully loaded on the trailer the boat weighs less then 4,000 pounds, it just so happens that my 99 z71 has 170,000 miles on it and although it tows the boat just fine, the tranny downshifts at every hint of a hill. I would think with the diesel I could set the cruise and have enough power to not worry about it.

i do tow the boat about 400 miles per week, another reason I thinka diesel would be a good option.

Never really liked the duramx trucks, they are too car like for me, hence the ford/dodge argument.

my buddy loves his 6.0 and tows a similar sized boat (slightly bigger) but online seems the 6.0's are hated.....

maybe I will flip a coin? The dodge certainly wins on looks.

I would consider the Dmax a close second the the Dodge but the first upgrade would be a straight axle conversion on the front (4x4). I would never consider a Ford 6.0.
Old 09-26-2007 | 07:51 PM
  #24  
up_roktoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
I wouldn't go through the work of swapping the ifs out, It's not like I would be using the truck to offroad, I've got plenty of opportunity to do that in jeeps and buggies.

I am still leaning towards the dodge, got to sell my current truck first.
Old 09-26-2007 | 07:53 PM
  #25  
up_roktoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jezzhuntin
Looks like you need a HANS system for that boat more than a truck
haha, yeah its a fun ride. Not the biggest on top end, not the fastest in the rough, but real good all around.
Old 09-26-2007 | 08:58 PM
  #26  
C Schomer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 1
From: Pueblo West
Mine is an early 03 (10-02) and it had some problems from the first owners neglect and abuse. Otherwise, none of the reported 03 problems. I'm in love with it and no regrets! Craig
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slothrockit
Introductions / New People
2
07-05-2008 10:25 AM
D384D
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
1
03-18-2007 06:56 PM
Stroked85
General Diesel Discussion
5
02-01-2007 05:11 PM
mbryson
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
16
06-23-2004 09:15 PM
fortknox82
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
4
07-24-2003 12:58 PM



Quick Reply: New guy looking for 2003+ cummins.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.