Looking at 07 5.9 mega cab leftover, what's the highway mileage between 3.73 and 4.10
#1
Looking at 07 5.9 mega cab leftover, what's the highway mileage between 3.73 and 4.10
I had planned on purchasing a mega cab with 3.73 rear gears after looking one over. I found out today that it was sold and the only other one left without going to the 6.7 has 4.10 rears. I usually run the highway between 70-75 mph. What should I expect fuel mileage wise? It has the 48re tranny.
#2
I have a Megacab w/ 3.73 gears. Here are a few things to consider. How do you use your truck. If you plan on installing larger wheels and tires you may want the 4.10 gears if you tow. I put H2 wheels/tires on and it is now geared too tall for towing (w/ my 3.73 gears). When I tow on long trips I switch back to my stock wheels. If I had 4.10 gears I would be OK with the H2 setup when towing.
On the other hand, if you don't tow alot the taller gearing(3.73) is the way to go. With stock wheels I turn 2000rpm at 70. With the H2's I turn 1750 at 70. I like my truck better w/ the H2's on it and in hindsight I would have gone with 4.10 gears.
To address your question on fuel mileage, I again say it depends on how much you tow. I think you'll get better mileage towing with 4.10 gears. If you use a truck for daily driving the 3.73 will be better. With my stock tires I got about 16mpg at 70-75mph.
Bob
On the other hand, if you don't tow alot the taller gearing(3.73) is the way to go. With stock wheels I turn 2000rpm at 70. With the H2's I turn 1750 at 70. I like my truck better w/ the H2's on it and in hindsight I would have gone with 4.10 gears.
To address your question on fuel mileage, I again say it depends on how much you tow. I think you'll get better mileage towing with 4.10 gears. If you use a truck for daily driving the 3.73 will be better. With my stock tires I got about 16mpg at 70-75mph.
Bob
#4
The 4.10 should give about 10% less fuel mileage than the 3.73 at hwy speeds. The 3.73 will run about 1900 RPM at 70 mph while the 4.10 will move up to 2100 - 2200 range. This is why the MPG goes down. You can compensate for this by going to 10% larger tires than stock. You will have to adjust the ECM programming for the larger tires to get the speedo to work correctly.
#6
Trending Topics
#9
Buy the truck, we can swap gears
My mileage sucks with 3.73's. A run to LA and back netted me 15mpg down, 13mpg back. 70-80mph the whole way both ways. Lifetime avg. on truck since new (8500 miles) is 14.1 hand-calculated.
I can't wait to see what happens when I mount my 35" MT's...
My mileage sucks with 3.73's. A run to LA and back netted me 15mpg down, 13mpg back. 70-80mph the whole way both ways. Lifetime avg. on truck since new (8500 miles) is 14.1 hand-calculated.
I can't wait to see what happens when I mount my 35" MT's...
#10
Nice to see there's some "honest" 5.9L guys reporting crap mileage from their trucks.
#11
It is not the 5.9 causing the poor mileage... It is going 70-80 that affects the mileage.. If JCleary tried keeping rpm under 2000 from the startup and limited max highway to 65 MPG would go up.
I can make my mileage go down to 15 if I drive it hard. If I drive it like I normally do I get 17mpg avg (50% highway and 50% around town). Don't blame the 5.9 as it is the driver that is USUALLY the cause of poor mileage.
I can make my mileage go down to 15 if I drive it hard. If I drive it like I normally do I get 17mpg avg (50% highway and 50% around town). Don't blame the 5.9 as it is the driver that is USUALLY the cause of poor mileage.
#12
It is not the 5.9 causing the poor mileage... It is going 70-80 that affects the mileage.. If JCleary tried keeping rpm under 2000 from the startup and limited max highway to 65 MPG would go up.
I can make my mileage go down to 15 if I drive it hard. If I drive it like I normally do I get 17mpg avg (50% highway and 50% around town). Don't blame the 5.9 as it is the driver that is USUALLY the cause of poor mileage.
I can make my mileage go down to 15 if I drive it hard. If I drive it like I normally do I get 17mpg avg (50% highway and 50% around town). Don't blame the 5.9 as it is the driver that is USUALLY the cause of poor mileage.
#13
Buy the truck, we can swap gears
My mileage sucks with 3.73's. A run to LA and back netted me 15mpg down, 13mpg back. 70-80mph the whole way both ways. Lifetime avg. on truck since new (8500 miles) is 14.1 hand-calculated.
I can't wait to see what happens when I mount my 35" MT's...
My mileage sucks with 3.73's. A run to LA and back netted me 15mpg down, 13mpg back. 70-80mph the whole way both ways. Lifetime avg. on truck since new (8500 miles) is 14.1 hand-calculated.
I can't wait to see what happens when I mount my 35" MT's...
I gained 2 mpg just by rolling past 20,000 miles
If I gain 2mpg every 20,000 miles, by the time I hit 200,000 miles, I'll have a 40 mpg truck!
#14
I got 17.2 on a trip from CN to NJ then to MD going about 70-75 half of the way and then 65 - 60 the rest. At 55 it gets great mileage but that's too slow. At 70 mileage isn't too bad but with 3.73's it would be better. I consistently have been getting 15.2 for the last couple weeks in 60 city/40 hwy driving. My average mpg for last year was 15.x.
#15
It is not the 5.9 causing the poor mileage... It is going 70-80 that affects the mileage.. If JCleary tried keeping rpm under 2000 from the startup and limited max highway to 65 MPG would go up.
I can make my mileage go down to 15 if I drive it hard. If I drive it like I normally do I get 17mpg avg (50% highway and 50% around town). Don't blame the 5.9 as it is the driver that is USUALLY the cause of poor mileage.
I can make my mileage go down to 15 if I drive it hard. If I drive it like I normally do I get 17mpg avg (50% highway and 50% around town). Don't blame the 5.9 as it is the driver that is USUALLY the cause of poor mileage.