3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

How Accurate is Computer MPG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2004 | 08:22 AM
  #1  
Mark Hodowanec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: VA
How Accurate is Computer MPG?

How accurate is the computer mpg? Accurate enough to base real world milage on? I am comparing two new trucks & will buy one of them. Some members suggested checking mpg on same stretch of road. Sounds good but only IF computer mpg is accurate.
Old 08-25-2004 | 08:57 AM
  #2  
Hoss's Avatar
Thats MR Hoss to you buddy!
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 3
From: Central Texas
Until I put the Edge EZ on my computer was usually within 1 mpg of my hand calculations at the pump.
Old 08-25-2004 | 09:07 AM
  #3  
gsdog1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: USA
I use the overhead on all 3 of the ones that have graced my driveway to tell me nothing more than what direction the nose of the truck is pointed, in a very general sense of course.

Add some goodies, gadgets, and BOMB's...totally useless.

Matt
Old 08-25-2004 | 09:13 AM
  #4  
odie2219's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Mine is always 1.5-2.5 on the low side.Good luck
Odie
Old 08-25-2004 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
Strjock81's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: NE Illinois
Mine is almost exactly half a mile per gallon on the short side
Old 08-25-2004 | 01:06 PM
  #6  
Joe N.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Longview, TX
Mine is about 1 MPG low.
Old 08-25-2004 | 01:09 PM
  #7  
gsbrockman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 20
From: Sand Gap, KY.
about .3 mpg shy before the installation of the EDGE EZ; about 2.1 to 2.3 mpg over after installation. You'll never be able to make an accurate comparison based on a short-term test drive.
Greg
Old 08-25-2004 | 01:57 PM
  #8  
FBs555CTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood, OR
I have kept track of mileage since new. I now have over 8000 miles racked up and my overhead is within 1% of hand calculated.

It is sometimes a little low or a little high on a tank by tank basis but that has more to do with how much I top of the tank.

A coworker recently bought a new CTD (after riding in mine!). I recommended that he test drive them on the highway and set the cruise to 65 mph. Then reset the computer and see were the mileage settles in. I realize this is just a rough guide but it may weed out the worst ones. I told him to look for one that does around 17-18mph. Mine will actually do 20+ but I have a 555.

Anyway, I don't remember the exact numbers but of the two that he drove, one showed a significant improvement over the other (both equiped the same). By significant I mean about 2-3 mpg. This may have just been computer diverences but it didn't hurt to try.

FB
Old 08-25-2004 | 02:08 PM
  #9  
johnny1509's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
My 2003 is about 1 to 1.5 mpg on the low side......
Old 08-25-2004 | 02:14 PM
  #10  
bulabula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: Eastern & Western Merryland
ditto on the overhead reading 1 mpg low.
Old 08-25-2004 | 03:37 PM
  #11  
Dieseljunkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Lake Arrowhead, Ca
My overhead reads about 1.5-2mpg low on my bone stock truck.
Scott
Old 08-25-2004 | 03:45 PM
  #12  
Big Jimbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
My 04.5 is always 1.0-2.0 on the low side
Old 08-25-2004 | 06:03 PM
  #13  
txhawg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
My is consistently about 3 mpg lower than hand calculated. You would think that one thing a computer does well is add and divide numbers. Why can't they get it right? I had a 2500 with the Hemi in it, and the overhead was within .1 mpg of my hand calc. By the way, my truck is stock.
Old 08-25-2004 | 11:03 PM
  #14  
ed paul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: wi.
hope mine reads low to
Old 08-25-2004 | 11:35 PM
  #15  
rmb93243's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal.
Mine was always real close, within a couple tenths, until I got that box . If i keep my foot out of it, the comp is still real close.

The biggest difference I see is my level of patience... Drives me nuts waiting for that dang foam!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.