3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Bummed.. I think I got a SO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2004 | 12:55 PM
  #16  
tcb's Avatar
tcb
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: alabama
my s.o pulls great, padzz must have had one that needed the reflash. i do have the ez installed and it is even better than i can express. regardless of what d.c. says, the biggest difference between s.o and h.o is computer tuning and the s.o. upgrades better.

tim
Old 03-27-2004 | 08:32 AM
  #17  
J BODY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 2
....also alot of the early 03 SO's had the last of the 47re transmissions.
Old 03-27-2004 | 10:06 AM
  #18  
BB6Wheeler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Fortunately, I did get the 48RE. The x-monitor comes next, then the Box. I want to get the Line-X or the Rhino, but both shops are 40 miles away, and they want the truck all day. I'll have to figure the logistics out on that one. I did get a suprise this morning, I had to back the Truck up a 45 degree wet incline, put in four low and didn't slip once! Gotta love this truck
Old 03-27-2004 | 02:32 PM
  #19  
katoiler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: stuck in california
Read this post then see what you think of an SO!http://www.ctd-resource.com/dev/show...threadid=41636
Old 03-28-2004 | 08:51 PM
  #20  
Rocket95's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Hmmmmmmmmmmm The SO is 275 hp the HO at that time was 305 hp in 6 speed trannies
Old 03-29-2004 | 10:21 AM
  #21  
bigblock2stroke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
the so for 2003-2004 was 250hp
Old 03-29-2004 | 02:36 PM
  #22  
PADZZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: SW Utah
Yea, mine was the 47RE. But again, after towing with the 6spd yesterday, there is NO comparison. I can get to speed ATLEAST twice as fast.....AND HOLD IT. Something i was unable to do with the SO/AUTO
Old 03-31-2004 | 06:36 AM
  #23  
TON4FUN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
I second PaDazz, My SO was a total dog. It kept gear hunting and would not pull 14K to save its life. The 3.73 gears killed it along with the underpowered motor. I had friends making fun of my truck cause it would take forever to get to 60 MPH. I bit the bullet and went with the HO 4.10 gear setup and she pulls like an ox. I'm sure you'll be happy if you have the 48RE and add a box. I just hope when you go to tow you don't experience what Padazz and I did. Which is the worst feeling in the world when you spend 30+K on a truck. Good Luck.
Old 03-31-2004 | 11:27 AM
  #24  
abc4yew's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 0
From: Maritimes, Canada
My SO was a dog when I got it with 6k miles on it. Turns out fuel filter and air filter were plugged and ECU had to be flashed. Took it to the dealer and no more barks. I crossed the scales at 27k combined on one trip. That might have been off a bit though because I blew one of the 6 trailer tires off when I had to brake hard for a deer at 90 mph, Yikes. I want to bomb like everyone else, but not to drive faster but to drive slower. At 75 mph this thing tows up highway grades no problem. I'd rather have the mileage though at 60 to 65 mph. I'm currently getting around 18.5 mpg empty on winter fuel in miserable weather. Can't wait till the shift to pure #2. More mileage, more power. Keep away from the Auto diesel in summer and you'll be fine, unbombed. KS
Old 03-31-2004 | 11:46 AM
  #25  
BB6Wheeler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
KS (and all others who have responded),
Thanks for the input. Even though I haven't attempted to tow the 5ver, I really don't anticipate any problems. If it acts like a dog, I'll check the filters first, and if that doesn't help, I'll look into the Edge or TST.
Thanks
Old 03-31-2004 | 12:54 PM
  #26  
TurboPirate24v's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
For the record...

I raced an 2003 SO about 6 months ago and blew it away ( with an EZ )...

And I have Dyno'ed with my EZ @

227 RWHP

So...remember that factory stated HP Ratings e.g., 250 or 275 or 305 are take at the Fly Wheel.
Old 03-31-2004 | 10:40 PM
  #27  
Dave D.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
My 2003 SO dynoed at 190hp, 335tq. With the Edge EZ the dyno went to 270/470. Tremendous power difference in all power ranges. 0-60 went from 11 seconds to less than 8. Tows boat and carries camper with no strain now.

Have pillar-mount gauges as well, which show the EGT's to be no problem so far.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stinkindiesel
Other
8
01-27-2010 09:15 PM
FSTDL
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
31
05-08-2009 01:32 PM
Don H
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
07-16-2004 06:54 PM
TON4FUN
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
3
06-28-2004 12:48 PM
Wade
Other
5
02-03-2003 06:57 PM



Quick Reply: Bummed.. I think I got a SO



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.