600 owners,...your gonna love this...
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southeast WI
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Thirsty600
They should have let Cummins handle the programing.......
They should have let Cummins handle the programing.......
Andy
#17
Originally posted by realsquash
I still don't think Dodge did the programming. I just can't see that. How would they even get it up and running? They don't know anything about pilot injection, post injection, etc. The Benz diesels don't even use a Mercedes ECU, I believe they use a Bosch, the same one that many other manufacturers use as a matter of fact.
Andy
I still don't think Dodge did the programming. I just can't see that. How would they even get it up and running? They don't know anything about pilot injection, post injection, etc. The Benz diesels don't even use a Mercedes ECU, I believe they use a Bosch, the same one that many other manufacturers use as a matter of fact.
Andy
Who they have working for them, and so on.
#19
Still not sure about the noises this thing makes, or doesn't for that matter? Very different than the 2 2nd gen 24 valvers I had. Will keep an eye out for a TSB.
FWIW - there is another thread in this category that discusses the programming of the ECM that may be of interest. Title is something about "Delaer finding EZ". Lots of other info in there, and does speak to the software.
Matt
FWIW - there is another thread in this category that discusses the programming of the ECM that may be of interest. Title is something about "Delaer finding EZ". Lots of other info in there, and does speak to the software.
Matt
#20
Originally posted by gsdog1
FWIW - there is another thread in this category that discusses the programming of the ECM that may be of interest. Title is something about "Delaer finding EZ". Lots of other info in there, and does speak to the software.
Matt
FWIW - there is another thread in this category that discusses the programming of the ECM that may be of interest. Title is something about "Delaer finding EZ". Lots of other info in there, and does speak to the software.
Matt
Heres a link.... LINK
#21
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New REFLASH is IN!!
They did mine today,...but bummer I had yet another bad injector. That's 7 new injectors they put in this thing. STAR only lets them do 3 at a time and one of the last three was bad. They changed it out but they want to wait till Monday and start it up after sitting and be sure there is no white smoke and that it idles properly. Then if that works ok I'll drive her for a couple days and get some hand calculated mileages to report for you guys. They left me a voice mail as I was on a plane, so I couldn't talk to them to get the TSB #,...but it is available.
#23
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
600 New Reflash
Originally posted by HighTen
Wow! I am really interested in the results so make sure not to forget us! (and this thread)
Wow! I am really interested in the results so make sure not to forget us! (and this thread)
#25
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The TSB you speak of is from Feb. of this year.. It is for white smoke at start up only, it has no mention of increased MPG.. I had mine reflashed 2 weeks ago and my mpg has increased but I put the TST on the same day of the reflash.. I think DC lies about the mileage thing just to shut people up, because we have heard it all before. It's always a month or 2 away , but deadlines always pass with no new TSB.. I would not hold your breath on this TSB thing, they have had a year to do it, so if it were going to happen it would have been done already IMO. As a whole, I think DC did what people wanted--more power-- and a more quiet engine. I think they figured that most would be ok with lower mpg in exchange for the other 2.
#26
Registered User
That TSB did nothing for me. I still have the white smoke at start up and poor milage. I had that TSB reflash done back in June. I talked to Cummins tech the other day that said my white smoke at start up is normal and that it is caused by the computer retarding timeing for a few seconds at start up. He said it retards it so far that it cant burn all the fuel. He said the reason for it but I cant remember now. I told him how if it sits for more than a few days it almost dont want to run for a few seconds after I start it. It will only run on a few cylinders and smoke like mad. He said that is normal for the 3rd gen trucks. He said they sometimes need to reset the timeing and that they will retard the timeing so far that it will barely run for a few seconds till it figures out where to set it. They will then smoke like mad for up to a minute till it gets set properly. He said they dont always do it but once in a while is normal. He seemed real knowlagable and seemed to know his stuff. He emediatly picked out my very LOUD tick and agreed it wasent rite. It is going in Wednesday for him to look at. Hopefully he will find something.
#28
Registered User
Fuel Mileage TSB - BAHHH!
More like "smoke and mirrors" to me. I had a feeling this miracle TSB was too good to be true. Makes sense . . . if it was truly a programming issue, there would be a more definite pattern of good/bad builds. My engine was built mid-March 04 so it doesn't fall into the TSB date range. The mileage I get isn't as bad as a few others here report, but it's nowhere close to those who brag about averaging 16-18. That's about as good as I can average on a highway trip (empty). Around town, the best I can do is 13-14, no matter how gentle I am on the go-pedal.
I'm hopeful for some kind of fix, but I doubt it will be a software issue.
Neil
More like "smoke and mirrors" to me. I had a feeling this miracle TSB was too good to be true. Makes sense . . . if it was truly a programming issue, there would be a more definite pattern of good/bad builds. My engine was built mid-March 04 so it doesn't fall into the TSB date range. The mileage I get isn't as bad as a few others here report, but it's nowhere close to those who brag about averaging 16-18. That's about as good as I can average on a highway trip (empty). Around town, the best I can do is 13-14, no matter how gentle I am on the go-pedal.
I'm hopeful for some kind of fix, but I doubt it will be a software issue.
Neil
#29
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand the frustration
Originally posted by NJMurvin
Fuel Mileage TSB - BAHHH!
More like "smoke and mirrors" to me. I had a feeling this miracle TSB was too good to be true. Makes sense . . . if it was truly a programming issue, there would be a more definite pattern of good/bad builds. My engine was built mid-March 04 so it doesn't fall into the TSB date range. The mileage I get isn't as bad as a few others here report, but it's nowhere close to those who brag about averaging 16-18. That's about as good as I can average on a highway trip (empty). Around town, the best I can do is 13-14, no matter how gentle I am on the go-pedal.
I'm hopeful for some kind of fix, but I doubt it will be a software issue.
Neil
Fuel Mileage TSB - BAHHH!
More like "smoke and mirrors" to me. I had a feeling this miracle TSB was too good to be true. Makes sense . . . if it was truly a programming issue, there would be a more definite pattern of good/bad builds. My engine was built mid-March 04 so it doesn't fall into the TSB date range. The mileage I get isn't as bad as a few others here report, but it's nowhere close to those who brag about averaging 16-18. That's about as good as I can average on a highway trip (empty). Around town, the best I can do is 13-14, no matter how gentle I am on the go-pedal.
I'm hopeful for some kind of fix, but I doubt it will be a software issue.
Neil