315/70-17s - Would You Buy Them Again??
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
315/70-17s - Would You Buy Them Again??
Thinking about getting some Firestone Destination MT's. They are available in 285/70-17, and the next step up is 315/70-17 (34.7" high). Any of you guys run 315/70s, did you lose a lot of power and mileage, would you put them on again? I don't spend much time off road, but when I do I am in gumbo and I have come very close to planting the truck with stock tires. I really want to gain some traction and ground clearance.
Thanks for your opinions.
Thanks for your opinions.
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 3,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am on my second set of 315-70-17's on my truck. When this set is worn out, I'll buy another set. If there is a power loss, I couldn't really tell it, even when towing, lots of power and power to spare. The additionalground clearance is nice, I'm in sagebrush country and whilethe bushes are not very big, they did hit the rockers a little - not after putting on the 35's.
As far a fuel mileage, I am not running a MT tire, maybe there is fuel mileage loss with an MT tire?? I am running an AT and my fuel mileage did not decrease.
I have a spare set of H2's and was thinking of mounting up a set of the Firestone Destination MT's so I would have a set for the mud season here. If you mount up a set, I will look forward to hearing what you're experience with them has been.
CD
As far a fuel mileage, I am not running a MT tire, maybe there is fuel mileage loss with an MT tire?? I am running an AT and my fuel mileage did not decrease.
I have a spare set of H2's and was thinking of mounting up a set of the Firestone Destination MT's so I would have a set for the mud season here. If you mount up a set, I will look forward to hearing what you're experience with them has been.
CD
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Olathe, Ks.
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll do it again. All the difference in the world for these trucks. They did make a small difference in power felt in the seat of the pants, but very negligble. I have a very aggresive mud terrain on mine, and they are wearing ok, but did make a mileage loss. I'm ok with that though, I drive my Saturn when I need mileage! I might back off to an all terrain, but 315 is the size for me.
#6
Registered User
I'm looking at the Bridgestone Revo 2's or the Firestone Destination LTR. Essentially the same tire and the only E rated 315's out there to my knowledge. A few times a year they have a 25% off sale. 15% off going on now. They share the Uni-T molding process which = a round tire requiring minimal weight to balance.
Trending Topics
#8
DTR's 'Wrench thrower...' And he aims for the gusto...
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Smith Valley, NV (sometimes Redwood City, CA)
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
I ran a set for about 50,000 miles and then got tired of how they steered the truck around and cost mileage. Also, when towing the gearing was just enough higher that it was bothersome. But they were great off road and in the snow.
Now I'm on my third set of 285s and that is the size I like the best. No DW, no pulling to the right, no mileage problems, no power steering weakness and the gearing is fine. It looks a little less agressive but, for me, they are the best compromise for real world use. Whatever you get, stay away from BFGs.
Now I'm on my third set of 285s and that is the size I like the best. No DW, no pulling to the right, no mileage problems, no power steering weakness and the gearing is fine. It looks a little less agressive but, for me, they are the best compromise for real world use. Whatever you get, stay away from BFGs.
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran a set for about 50,000 miles and then got tired of how they steered the truck around and cost mileage. Also, when towing the gearing was just enough higher that it was bothersome. But they were great off road and in the snow.
Now I'm on my third set of 285s and that is the size I like the best. No DW, no pulling to the right, no mileage problems, no power steering weakness and the gearing is fine. It looks a little less agressive but, for me, they are the best compromise for real world use. Whatever you get, stay away from BFGs.
Now I'm on my third set of 285s and that is the size I like the best. No DW, no pulling to the right, no mileage problems, no power steering weakness and the gearing is fine. It looks a little less agressive but, for me, they are the best compromise for real world use. Whatever you get, stay away from BFGs.
#10
Registered User
I've got almost 88K (half stock wheels, last half on H2s) on two different sets and they have done me well. However, I have a set of five 285/75/17E Nitto TGs waiting in the garage for me to get my OEM wheels out of storage. Personally, I think they are about the same height as the BFGs never measured 34.x inches that they claimed, and the 285s are narrower, maybe gaining me some more mileage. Nothing bad to say about the 315s, but I'm going a different direction this time.
#11
we have a set of 315/70/17s f/s destination on our brush truck(firetruck) and i never thought that they looked real wide but over all they deff. do the job and get us out of sticky conditions and theyve been wearing pretty good too.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe I'd buy some again in that size.
I like the way they look and ride also, but I didn't like the way the truck steers with them on...felt like it would "bind" at slower speeds.
To me, finding the right rim to put them on was difficult. With the stock wheels they would rub the control arms. I had some aftermarket wheels with 4.25"s of back spacing and they stuck out too far for my taste and flung junk all the way up to my windows.
285 is the perfect size that I've tried so far.
I like the way they look and ride also, but I didn't like the way the truck steers with them on...felt like it would "bind" at slower speeds.
To me, finding the right rim to put them on was difficult. With the stock wheels they would rub the control arms. I had some aftermarket wheels with 4.25"s of back spacing and they stuck out too far for my taste and flung junk all the way up to my windows.
285 is the perfect size that I've tried so far.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Surrey BC Canada (it's not that bad eh!)
Posts: 3,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I knew I was going to have these troubles I'd have gone for the 285/75's.
When these need changing I'll go that route unless by then I've gone to longer control arms then I'll stick with the 35's, they look good on a leveled truck IMO.
(Hope to do control arms with income tax refund)
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the input. Firestone just came out with the Destination MTs in 285 and 315 with E ratings. Seems like more people with manuals like the 315s than thos with 48REs.