Who is running a mechanical fuel pressure gauge
#16
Administrator
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SW Pennsylvania - Greene County
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I'll just toss in my 3 cents of comments on "fuel in the cab"
Over the years since the mid 1960's I have owned and operated both GM & Dodge trucks that had the 18 gallon GASOLINE TANKS mounted BEHIND the drivers seat. The reason it was eliminated in the 1970's was not due to a problem with gasoline leaking into the cab and causing fires. It was removed do to combat safety issues involving crashes where the truck rolled over onto its side and slid down the pavement with the tank filler pointed at the road. The cap ground off and the gasoline poured out and ignited from the sparks that were produced as the filler tube and the cab metal dragged down the road. In the 60's I also ran a mechanical fuel pressure gauges in the cab on gasoline engine powered vehicles. Today I feel that a mechanical fuel pressure gauge in the cab does not constitute any more of an issue than running a mechanical oil pressure gauge with hot oil in the cab.
Over the years since the mid 1960's I have owned and operated both GM & Dodge trucks that had the 18 gallon GASOLINE TANKS mounted BEHIND the drivers seat. The reason it was eliminated in the 1970's was not due to a problem with gasoline leaking into the cab and causing fires. It was removed do to combat safety issues involving crashes where the truck rolled over onto its side and slid down the pavement with the tank filler pointed at the road. The cap ground off and the gasoline poured out and ignited from the sparks that were produced as the filler tube and the cab metal dragged down the road. In the 60's I also ran a mechanical fuel pressure gauges in the cab on gasoline engine powered vehicles. Today I feel that a mechanical fuel pressure gauge in the cab does not constitute any more of an issue than running a mechanical oil pressure gauge with hot oil in the cab.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll just toss in my 3 cents of comments on "fuel in the cab"
Over the years since the mid 1960's I have owned and operated both GM & Dodge trucks that had the 18 gallon GASOLINE TANKS mounted BEHIND the drivers seat. The reason it was eliminated in the 1970's was not due to a problem with gasoline leaking into the cab and causing fires. It was removed do to combat safety issues involving crashes where the truck rolled over onto its side and slid down the pavement with the tank filler pointed at the road. The cap ground off and the gasoline poured out and ignited from the sparks that were produced as the filler tube and the cab metal dragged down the road. In the 60's I also ran a mechanical fuel pressure gauges in the cab on gasoline engine powered vehicles. Today I feel that a mechanical fuel pressure gauge in the cab does not constitute any more of an issue than running a mechanical oil pressure gauge with hot oil in the cab.
Over the years since the mid 1960's I have owned and operated both GM & Dodge trucks that had the 18 gallon GASOLINE TANKS mounted BEHIND the drivers seat. The reason it was eliminated in the 1970's was not due to a problem with gasoline leaking into the cab and causing fires. It was removed do to combat safety issues involving crashes where the truck rolled over onto its side and slid down the pavement with the tank filler pointed at the road. The cap ground off and the gasoline poured out and ignited from the sparks that were produced as the filler tube and the cab metal dragged down the road. In the 60's I also ran a mechanical fuel pressure gauges in the cab on gasoline engine powered vehicles. Today I feel that a mechanical fuel pressure gauge in the cab does not constitute any more of an issue than running a mechanical oil pressure gauge with hot oil in the cab.
I have a 71 K5 Blazer and 72 GMC Jimmy and both have the tanks in the rear but unfortunately the filler spouts are still off the exterior side. On these, the filler is in the rear bed side which might be a bit better than next to the driver door. Maybe not though. I can see how the danger still exists despite the rear tank location and relocation of the fill tube to the rear. Still is a drag and spark danger.
I agree that with all the possibilities in collisions, the gauge issue is probably at the bottom of the danger list. For some it is a psychological issue with fuel and cab space I think. If I had any issue, say, with the line leaking some drops of diesel into the cab on a long family trip I would never hear the end of it though LOL. I know you could pull over and cut off fuel through a needle valve but I still see how many just won't go there.
#19
Registered User
I'll just toss in my 3 cents of comments on "fuel in the cab"
Over the years since the mid 1960's I have owned and operated both GM & Dodge trucks that had the 18 gallon GASOLINE TANKS mounted BEHIND the drivers seat. The reason it was eliminated in the 1970's was not due to a problem with gasoline leaking into the cab and causing fires. It was removed do to combat safety issues involving crashes where the truck rolled over onto its side and slid down the pavement with the tank filler pointed at the road. The cap ground off and the gasoline poured out and ignited from the sparks that were produced as the filler tube and the cab metal dragged down the road. In the 60's I also ran a mechanical fuel pressure gauges in the cab on gasoline engine powered vehicles. Today I feel that a mechanical fuel pressure gauge in the cab does not constitute any more of an issue than running a mechanical oil pressure gauge with hot oil in the cab.
Over the years since the mid 1960's I have owned and operated both GM & Dodge trucks that had the 18 gallon GASOLINE TANKS mounted BEHIND the drivers seat. The reason it was eliminated in the 1970's was not due to a problem with gasoline leaking into the cab and causing fires. It was removed do to combat safety issues involving crashes where the truck rolled over onto its side and slid down the pavement with the tank filler pointed at the road. The cap ground off and the gasoline poured out and ignited from the sparks that were produced as the filler tube and the cab metal dragged down the road. In the 60's I also ran a mechanical fuel pressure gauges in the cab on gasoline engine powered vehicles. Today I feel that a mechanical fuel pressure gauge in the cab does not constitute any more of an issue than running a mechanical oil pressure gauge with hot oil in the cab.
#20
Registered User
And they used to build cars and trucks with solid steering shafts that impaled many drivers. Oh, and no seat belts too! Safety Glass?
There is a reason the racing orginizations dont allow fuel pressure gauges inside of the vehicle.
It is no fun to have a fuel pressure gauge fail at 135 mph in a closed cockpit. I only received 2nd degree burns, but I can tell you they hurt!
The great thing about this Country, is you can do as you like (within reason)
and I would fight for anyones right to thier opinon, even if I disagreed. That is what makes us great!
oh, and I had a 71 Crew Cab, and the first thing I did to it was get that tank out of the cab!
There is a reason the racing orginizations dont allow fuel pressure gauges inside of the vehicle.
It is no fun to have a fuel pressure gauge fail at 135 mph in a closed cockpit. I only received 2nd degree burns, but I can tell you they hurt!
The great thing about this Country, is you can do as you like (within reason)
and I would fight for anyones right to thier opinon, even if I disagreed. That is what makes us great!
oh, and I had a 71 Crew Cab, and the first thing I did to it was get that tank out of the cab!
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Monticello IN
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think about it this way. Lets say your layin upside down in the middle of the road strapped in the seat and cant get the stupid 20 plus year old seat belt latch to release, the hose on the back of the guage shears off in the crash (who cares if its flammable or combustable it burns either way) the steering column is mangled the key wont turn off so the electric pump is pumpin away or the darn engine just wont die your odds of a good samaritan pulling you out are better with the fire outside the cab then in there with you. Granted chances are slim but it does happen. Dont put your loved ones through something that a couple hundred bucks could make the difference in the ride going to the hospital or the morgue. Bottom line is will something bad happen ? Probably not but dont take the chance keep the fuel outside and live to tell about it.
#23
Administrator
It matters only because gasoline is ready to burn at around minus 40 degrees F., where diesel needs to be heated to around 125 degrees F.. The danger of gasoline igniting is about a thousand times greater than diesel. That said, I agree with you because the ability to burn is not the only danger...Mark
#24
Registered User
I am running a mechanical gauge from a needle valve I modified to fit in the fuel filter vent. I close the valve down to eleminate needle bouce and it provides for a greatly reduced flow if the thing should leak. The only guys that don't seem to like it are the tech. inspectors at the nearest drag strip. I close the valve and disconnect it to run.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: granite falls washington
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I use this with my fuel pressure oil pressure & transmission pressure gauges. http://www.dieselmanor.com/dm_products/DM-CGI2240.asp
Not for the fire that could happen in the cab but for the clean up if the line breaks.
If that line breaks your not going to shut down the motor till you can safely pull over.
(note) the trans gauge is in my Buick GS400 http://www.jegs.com/p/TCI/TCI-Transm...87683/10002/-1
Not for the fire that could happen in the cab but for the clean up if the line breaks.
If that line breaks your not going to shut down the motor till you can safely pull over.
(note) the trans gauge is in my Buick GS400 http://www.jegs.com/p/TCI/TCI-Transm...87683/10002/-1
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nrussell
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
4
07-23-2008 08:58 PM
VIPERBLUELX
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
6
08-06-2006 01:54 PM
Flatty
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
31
12-27-2004 09:53 PM
Diesel Dave
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
4
01-03-2003 03:37 PM