1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Super HX40 vs. DAP S300 (62/65/12)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2011 | 07:35 PM
  #1  
The_Head's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Wyo
Super HX40 vs. DAP S300 (62/65/12)

I am toying with the idea of switching turbos, mainly because the Super HX40 would come with a 16 cm housing. Also trying to get back to a first gen style of turbo, as I am running an S362 that has the 3rd gen style of compressor housing. Do you think the performance would be comparable on these turbos?


PM me if you don't know what DAP means. Just trying to stay within the rules.
Old 04-29-2011 | 08:43 PM
  #2  
BILTIT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 9
From: Lloydminster SK/AB
Why do you want to get away from the 3rd gen style?
Old 04-29-2011 | 08:58 PM
  #3  
Richie O's Avatar
366 Spring Chicken
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 3
I assume he wants away from the 12cm he has. ,, Jon, I think the super 40 will not flow as much air as your 62mm. As far as my brain goes the super 40 flows a little more then the 57mm model S300, then next above the 40 is your 62 S300 based rig.
Old 04-29-2011 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
The_Head's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Wyo
Originally Posted by BILTIT
Why do you want to get away from the 3rd gen style?
I think a first gen style compresssor would be a better fit. I'd also like to go back to a stock first gen drain tube. You should see the monstrosity that I have now.

Are the Super 40 specs 60/65/16?
Old 04-29-2011 | 09:59 PM
  #5  
Ahineman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Gallipolis, Ohio
Originally Posted by The_Head
Are the Super 40 specs 60/65/16?
Yes.


http://www.myholsetturbo.com/40appnotes.html

Per Holset, the Super 40 flows "over 850 cfm", how much more, I don't know.
Per BD, the S300 57mm extended tip compressor wheel flows 870 cfm.
I would think the 62mm extended tip would flow quite a bit more than the Super 40, but is yours extended tip or not? I can't find a flow rate for that wheel. I've read that the non-ET wheels flow about 20% less than the ET ones.
Old 04-29-2011 | 10:11 PM
  #6  
Richie O's Avatar
366 Spring Chicken
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 3
I agree on the 57mm 300 model cfm's. I spoke on the phone to Curt Henderson who is the tech at borge warner and he told me 870 cfm's. I had read somewhere though that the super hx 40 flowed more then the baby s300. Not sure on that.
Old 04-29-2011 | 10:59 PM
  #7  
The_Head's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Wyo
Here is a compressor map if that will help any.

Old 04-30-2011 | 11:05 PM
  #8  
ARbowhunter7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, GA
You should get rid of that S362 immediately. It's ruining your truck. I'll bite the bullet and take it off your hands, though.

Seriously, though, what exactly do you not like about it (besides the drain tube)? Is it purely aesthetic? I'm assuming your DAP has a full-polished 3rd gen housing?

Looks like you will be giving up a little air to make the swap. Will a 7 blade 40 cool your injectors?
Old 05-01-2011 | 04:07 PM
  #9  
The_Head's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Wyo
I guess the 12 cm housing is killing it for me. My truck has a few things killing the top end right now, and I think this is one of them.

I guess it is a consensus that a Super HX40 would be a step down in the air department.
Old 05-01-2011 | 04:30 PM
  #10  
Ahineman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Gallipolis, Ohio
Time to hang an S400 under it.
Old 05-01-2011 | 04:54 PM
  #11  
The_Head's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Wyo
Would the 12 cm housing still be an issue for twins?
Old 05-01-2011 | 05:15 PM
  #12  
Ahineman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Gallipolis, Ohio
??
Tacoclaw over on 1stgen.org plans on using the same turbo you have in a twin setup. He has a steedspeed exhaust manifold and an external gate though. Based off the fact that I've seen people run hx35s and he351s for secondaries, I'd think you would be fine. Neither one of them flow as well on the exhaust side as an s300. You've got a lot better internal wastegate than they do.
Old 05-02-2011 | 11:19 AM
  #13  
bgilbert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,253
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute,IN
Originally Posted by The_Head
Would the 12 cm housing still be an issue for twins?
No, that's what I have on my 62/71 in my twin set.
Old 05-02-2011 | 05:04 PM
  #14  
The_Head's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Wyo
If I could do the piping I would be all over twins, unfortunately I don't have the skills or the patience.
Old 05-02-2011 | 08:03 PM
  #15  
fatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Centerville, WA
Originally Posted by The_Head
If I could do the piping I would be all over twins, unfortunately I don't have the skills or the patience.
If you want to spend the money there are at least a couple companies that make kits for the first gens.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.