1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2013, 06:06 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
93-12Smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You also have a weight difference between street and mud tires.
Old 03-13-2013, 07:57 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
gyman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 1,437
Received 208 Likes on 130 Posts
I don't know about down there with your #1 and #2 diesel but here we have summer and winter diesel. Winter diesel costs 5mpg and very noticeable when towing
Old 03-13-2013, 08:12 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
RonA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Browns Valley CA
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It has very little to do with HP. When i bought my 1st gen I dyno'd at about 160hp and got 20-21mpg out on the road(3/4T 4x4 3.55gears). At 500 hp it ran 21-22mpg on the road. At 750hp it still got 21mpg. At 1000hp with the 5.9 it got 20-21mpg hwy. Now with a 6.7 at 1000hp it gets....... 20mpg hwy.
P-pump, no smog parts, no headaches.
Old 03-13-2013, 08:43 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Smokin$$away's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Tx
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dang my friends 92 auto 4x4 4:10s with add on o.d. It gets 9.5 to 10. My old 67 ford 1/2 ton f-100 step side 352 4v with 3:90s 3 on the tree with cable pull o.d. Got 23 to 25. The sad part was it would pull a trailer in underdrive and get 16/18. Yes different dog but technology since the days gone by has made a turn towards the far left. The 2012 kw I run gets 3.2 mpg on a good day with all great technology working. Yes burn twice fuel but twice as clean "but how much pollution to make twice the fuel". Make no sense. Washington needs to open the door and look out into the real world, and they will when someone greases their palm but with the grease they can't grip the door ****. Done off the soapbox-and I apologize to those who think D.C. Does all the good!
Old 03-13-2013, 11:55 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
thrashingcows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 7,235
Received 1,334 Likes on 864 Posts
Originally Posted by NJTman
Believe it or not, the type / tread on your tires have more impact on your fuel mileage that you would believe.

I have two sets of rubbers for my truck. A set of mud terrain tires I use in the winter, and a set of summer highway tires I use for the rest of the year. With the mud tires on, I drop my fuel mileage almost 4 MPG, just because of their tread pattern. Since they're mudders, you can feel the rumbling when pulling away from a stoplight, that eventually goes away when you get moving. Rolling resistance plays a big role in your MPG's as when I put the summer tires back on, my mileage goes right back to 18-19 MPG.
I agree with you on this one. When I was going to buy tires for the crewcacab I was looking for a good straight line tire to maximize fuel economy. I ended up with the BFG Commercial T/A. I also run 85 Lbs in the tires...yes a little harsher ride, but as stated...less rolling resistance = more MPG.

Running mixed Hwy/local I get 20-21 mpg in the crewcab. Straight Hwy I have seen a bet of just shy of 28 mpg....but usually average about 25 mpg.
Old 03-14-2013, 06:00 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
NJTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land of the Toxic Avenger
Posts: 6,790
Received 1,648 Likes on 1,121 Posts
Originally Posted by thrashingcows
I agree with you on this one.
Well, at least I got one.....

Originally Posted by thrashingcows
I also run 85 Lbs in the tires...yes a little harsher ride, but as stated...less rolling resistance = more MPG.
Yup.... I run them in the same 80-90psi range myself. I know it's over the recommended pressure, but after decades of doing so, I've never had any issue other than, depending on the vehicle, a little over wearing of the center of the tire. I compensate for that at the next rotation.

Originally Posted by thrashingcows
Straight Hwy I have seen a bet of just shy of 28 mpg....but usually average about 25 mpg.
I've NEVER seen that type of mileage, but then again, I've done no real modifications other than the 3200 spring. After I install gauges, I'll tell you if my "tweaks" made any difference.
Old 03-14-2013, 05:01 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
dodgenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton,MO
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
If that's imperial gallons, they are about 20% more than we get in the US.
Old 03-15-2013, 08:54 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
thrashingcows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 7,235
Received 1,334 Likes on 864 Posts
No I base all my calculations off the US gallon....3.78L to one US gallon. I fill up in the US anyway.

I don't know how, or why, my mileage is so good, but I'm not complaining.
Old 03-16-2013, 09:13 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
SORTIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: METRO USA
Posts: 565
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
I'm a MPG hound with few mods on my truck (4" exhaust is about it)

I run narrow skinny tires and keep the PSIs where they belong

My MPGs run 22-24 and when they drop I know something's wrong

last time it was the fuel pump screw, which had backed its way out - producing alot of black exhaust upon acceleration

I have no desire to own a modern truck with electronics and power-robbing emissions equipment, especially if it's less fuel-efficient to boot
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bngcustoms
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
45
06-20-2009 06:55 PM
richard
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
26
09-06-2007 01:35 PM
bigfish5
General Diesel Discussion
2
09-19-2006 12:56 AM
Maddog
Other
1
01-03-2003 10:01 AM
rshelton88
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
15
12-22-2002 09:40 PM



Quick Reply: Mpg



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.