1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Which housing would be better...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2005, 01:59 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Galveston, IN (Kokomo)
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which housing would be better...

I am still trying to figure out this whole turbine housing deal.

Which would be better for all around performance, a 12cm waste gate turbine housing (found one really cheap from a 2nd gen), 14cm nom waste gate housing, or a 16cm non waste gate turbine housing?
The main disadvantage that I can see for the 12 and 14cm turbine housing is that the fact it will move the down pipe about an inch rearword, which may make it hard to have a 4" down pipe.

Or is there another option for turbo upgrades that is less then $200 that I'm missing?

edit: I primarily drive unloaded city/highway is about 50/50. On occasion I plan on pulling a trailer weighing no more than 8-10k. And in the future I will probably trailer my Jeep out through the Rockies, which would be about the only high altitude driving I will see. I also plan on getting PODs, 3200 govenor springs, crank the pump, and atleast 4" exhaust all the way out. The PODS may be several months away still, but the rest will be done within a month more than likely. I do have guages on the way
Old 06-03-2005, 02:07 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
92DIESEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: INWOOD, West 'BY GOD' Virginia
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My vote is the 16 only because of the lower back pressure at top end. The spool up time between the 21 you have now and the 16 is insane- trust me I just changed mine 1 1/2 months ago.

While your changing the gov. spring you should grind the foot down

Michael
Old 06-03-2005, 02:26 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
apwatson50's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Golden, Colorado
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With PODs the 12cm will be too small. For all around performance and price you can't go wrong with the 16cm. For just all around performance the 14cm is where its at, but at $400 or so just for the housing I don't think its worth it.

I have the 12cm on right now, and a 4in down pipe in the shop I am not sure if its going to fit or not. I am thinking about going back to the 16cm. The spoolup of the 12cm sure is nice, but I think that performance on the top end suffers especially with the 3200gsk and especially PODs
Old 06-03-2005, 03:35 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
G1625S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: port crane, NY
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Kennedy,
With the mods you are planning, I think the 16cm is the best compromise. A 14cm NON wategated is not 400 bucks, but the wategated version is expensive. A non w/g 14 is too restrictive, period. With my old pump that was cranked right up, my 18 spooled nicely. I've got the 12cm now, but my new pump has a lock collar and a bosch warantee , so I need the spooling of the 12 to keep me cool . I may just put my 18 back on when I finally crank the pump up 'cause it worked fine with the extra fuel I once had...

g
Old 06-03-2005, 06:08 PM
  #5  
Adminstrator-ess
 
wannadiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Holland, PA
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
I'm with them. Run the 16 cm unless you can afford the wastegated 14 cm.
Old 06-03-2005, 07:49 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Galveston, IN (Kokomo)
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what good does the waste gate really do then? Most of the people with second gens. that I know disconnected the waste gate anyhow?
Old 06-03-2005, 07:51 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
DODGE 92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEW BRUNSWICK
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
id run 16 that is wat i plan to do
Old 06-03-2005, 08:01 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
G1625S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: port crane, NY
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
'So what good does the waste gate really do then?'

The wastegate allows a smaller housing to 'act' like a bigger housing by being able to bypass exhaust around the turbine wheel at a pre-determined boost level, thus keeping boost under control at higher revs.

Most who render their wastegate permanently closed are doing so for the added volume of air the higher boost provides. I don't believe it's such a good idea because with a small turbine housing and no wastegate, it is possible and likely one will over speed the turbo which will superheat the inlet air at best and damage the turbo/engine at worst. Stock trucks get away with this, but when you add fuel, it becomes all too easy to push the turbo out of it's map and into the danger zone.

g
Old 06-04-2005, 01:47 AM
  #9  
Patron Saint of 1st gens
 
Bushy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stock turbo (no matter what housing you use) has an efficiency limit of about 24 - 26psi....after that it starts to create very hot boost air and it get's uglier by the lb. .....
The 16cm is a great comprimise housing...if you tune the truck correctly it will spool up nicely for you and still have "legs" at the high end.....
Even a 16cm will start to give you heat problems if you really go heavy with the fueling though so keep that in mind....
An awesome combo is the 14cm WG ....it is a bit more costly and it does have limitations at the upper end but you can't beat the "off the line" performance and still have "some" legs at the upper end.....all in all the most practical and versitile is the 16cm.....

pb.....
Old 06-04-2005, 10:11 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
rebal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yuba city Kalifornia
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
the 16 was a real good improvement for me from the stock one but with PODs you might just want to do the wg14 and be ready for the Bomb bug. I still see EGTs in the high side and 38 psi boost with the 16cm so in a while i will send off for the wg14cm . my.02
Old 06-04-2005, 12:53 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Galveston, IN (Kokomo)
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by rebal
the 16 was a real good improvement for me from the stock one but with PODs you might just want to do the wg14 and be ready for the Bomb bug. I still see EGTs in the high side and 38 psi boost with the 16cm so in a while i will send off for the wg14cm . my.02
what do you mean by the "Bomb bug"?
Old 06-04-2005, 02:43 PM
  #13  
Adminstrator-ess
 
wannadiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Holland, PA
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Modifications are often called "bombs" on diesel sites. It's an acronym for "Better Off Modified, Baby". I think it's a West coast thing.
Old 06-04-2005, 06:56 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
ChrisLib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boerne, TX
Posts: 1,517
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally posted by wannadiesel
Modifications are often called "bombs" on diesel sites. It's an acronym for "Better Off Modified, Baby". I think it's a West coast thing.
bombs,mods,hacks,tweaks....whatever, IT`S FUN
Old 06-05-2005, 07:48 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Stomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eureka,CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah the bug bit me pretty hard and believe me it’s a long slippery slope. I started with some pump mods and then went to a 16 housing. Now look at my sig. We all have to start somewhere. Some of us just don’t have the will power to stop and I don’t think I will ever will. I hope someday I get my priorities right and stop spending all of my money on my pickup. Well you only live once right. You have been warned!!!!!!!!!!!

Stomp
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TORQUE BEAST
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
17
03-11-2008 07:25 AM
1882
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
3
08-26-2006 11:50 PM
Graphite600
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
13
01-28-2005 10:08 AM
DanTana
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
2
09-13-2004 09:27 PM
Sarge1124
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
12
11-13-2002 01:40 PM



Quick Reply: Which housing would be better...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.