1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

4:10's to 3:55's Would my truck be quicker.,..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2009 | 04:40 PM
  #1  
DarrinGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
4:10's to 3:55's Would my truck be quicker.,..?

I am swapping the 4:10's and going to 3:55's. My thinking is that the acceleration may actually be quicker because it will let the Cummins motor stay in the lower rpm range longer getting better use of the torque before letting the higher rpm HP take over.

Does this make sense or am I just dreaming,..?
Old 03-18-2009 | 04:45 PM
  #2  
DNRCustoms's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 1
From: Richmond, MI
Well, depends on your transmission, if your running the 518 non lock up, then it should definatly pull the gears farther which would make it quicker for say.. I think it has to do with a lot of variables.. Tire size, the way your trans shifts, trans model.. But you will most likely pick up some top speed and pull each gear a little farther and pick up some mpg on the highway.. Good Luck!
Old 03-18-2009 | 05:30 PM
  #3  
DarrinGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Thanks, I have a Ford C6 Automatic that is built, shift kit, and low stall towing RV converter and a Gearvendors Overdrive. I usually shift it manually with a B&M Shifter and it grabs the gears pretty hard. I am definitely doing it for the lower highway rpms but to also bring them down to a better power range while towing my 5th wheel.
Old 03-18-2009 | 09:34 PM
  #4  
RollinCoalSmoke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: H'ville Tx.
It "the 3:55s" will let you pull longer in each gear but i'm not sure about the towing part. I have both 3:54s w/5sp. & 4:10s w/gearvenders and an automatic. On flat ground the auto w/4:10s will outpull the other. But after getting up to speed "70+" the ole 5sp w/3:54s will walk away. Fuel economy suffers w/4:10s 13.84 mpg but i'd argue all day it has more to do with the auto trans than the 4:10s. Hope this didn't confuse you it was meant for a comparison only. Maybe it shed a lil light on what your trying to accomplish.
Old 03-18-2009 | 10:16 PM
  #5  
peobryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Goshen, Ky
4.10's are "better" for towing, but 90% of people that tow, don't tow heavy enough to "need" 4.10's. The switch to 3.54's will get you better fuel mileage, due to lower RPM at highway speeds, and they will be fine for towing.
Old 03-18-2009 | 11:38 PM
  #6  
Thunderhog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 550
Likes: 1
From: San Jose Ca.
Quicker, no. Faster, yes.
Old 03-18-2009 | 11:59 PM
  #7  
92roughstock's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Southeast MO
You will likely lose some speed off the line, but accelerating from say, 30mph, to highway speeds most likely will be close to the same. If you dont like your power with the 3.54s, turn some screws on the pump to take up the slack.

I've towed in the mid 20K range with 3.54s. I dont think 4.10s are necessary under 95% of towing conditions.
Old 03-19-2009 | 02:33 AM
  #8  
The_Head's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Wyo
^^ You towed 25,000 lbs or was the total weight of the truck and trailer 25,000 lbs?
Old 03-19-2009 | 03:06 AM
  #9  
RollinCoalSmoke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: H'ville Tx.
I don't know about him but i've scaled 49,700 with a 24v 6sp w/3:54s. My nephew came down to help out and ran the hotshot rig over to load what he thought was pipe but it was drill collars that instead of weighing 22lbs/ft it weighed 250lbs/ft. Nobody can say the Dodges won't pull with 3:54s, it pulled that load about 100 miles, couldn't stop in a country mile tho. Never ran hot, egts about 900, fuel mileage @ app. 12.5mpg. Total drivetrain workout lol.
Old 03-19-2009 | 09:21 AM
  #10  
92roughstock's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Southeast MO
The Head- it was a Gross Combined of ~24-25K on a regular basis. Average MPG was in the 13-14 range unless I hit a bad head wind.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wcbcruzer
General Diesel Discussion
11
04-17-2008 10:19 PM
wcbcruzer
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
5
03-25-2008 11:55 AM
barracuda
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
9
07-22-2005 12:29 AM
Cumm Again?
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
10
09-15-2004 06:13 PM
7mmrum
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
12
08-28-2004 02:03 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.